Tidal evolution of close-in extrasolar planets

Brian Jackson, Richard J. Greenberg, Rory Barnes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

192 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The distribution of eccentricities e of extrasolar planets with semimajor axes a > 0.2 AU is very uniform, and values for e are relatively large, averaging 0.3 and broadly distributed up to near 1. For a < 0.2 AU, eccentricities are much smaller (most e < 0.2), a characteristic widely attributed to damping by tides after the planets formed and the protoplanetary gas disk dissipated. Most previous estimates of the tidal damping considered the tides raised on the planets, but ignored the tides raised on the stars. Most also assumed specific values for the planets' poorly constrained tidal dissipation parameter Qp. Perhaps most important, in many studies the strongly coupled evolution between e and a was ignored. We have now integrated the coupled tidal evolution equations for e and a over the estimated age of each planet, and confirmed that the distribution of initial e values of close-in planets matches that of the general population for reasonable Q values, with the best fits for stellar and planetary Q being ∼105.5 and ∼106.5, respectively. The accompanying evolution of a values shows most close-in planets had significantly larger a at the start of tidal migration. The earlier gas disk migration did not bring all planets to their current orbits. The current small values of a were only reached gradually due to tides over the lifetimes of the planets. These results may have important implications for planet formation models, atmospheric models of "hot Jupiters," and the success of transit surveys.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1396-1406
Number of pages11
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume678
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 10 2008

Fingerprint

extrasolar planets
planets
planet
tides
tide
eccentricity
damping
atmospheric models
transit
Jupiter (planet)
gases
gas
Jupiter
dissipation
orbits
stars
life (durability)
estimates

Keywords

  • Celestial mechanics
  • Planetary systems: formation
  • Planetary systems: protoplanetary disks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Tidal evolution of close-in extrasolar planets. / Jackson, Brian; Greenberg, Richard J.; Barnes, Rory.

In: Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 678, No. 2, 10.05.2008, p. 1396-1406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, Brian ; Greenberg, Richard J. ; Barnes, Rory. / Tidal evolution of close-in extrasolar planets. In: Astrophysical Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 678, No. 2. pp. 1396-1406.
@article{052975d33e294ca1875e8228d7782067,
title = "Tidal evolution of close-in extrasolar planets",
abstract = "The distribution of eccentricities e of extrasolar planets with semimajor axes a > 0.2 AU is very uniform, and values for e are relatively large, averaging 0.3 and broadly distributed up to near 1. For a < 0.2 AU, eccentricities are much smaller (most e < 0.2), a characteristic widely attributed to damping by tides after the planets formed and the protoplanetary gas disk dissipated. Most previous estimates of the tidal damping considered the tides raised on the planets, but ignored the tides raised on the stars. Most also assumed specific values for the planets' poorly constrained tidal dissipation parameter Qp. Perhaps most important, in many studies the strongly coupled evolution between e and a was ignored. We have now integrated the coupled tidal evolution equations for e and a over the estimated age of each planet, and confirmed that the distribution of initial e values of close-in planets matches that of the general population for reasonable Q values, with the best fits for stellar and planetary Q being ∼105.5 and ∼106.5, respectively. The accompanying evolution of a values shows most close-in planets had significantly larger a at the start of tidal migration. The earlier gas disk migration did not bring all planets to their current orbits. The current small values of a were only reached gradually due to tides over the lifetimes of the planets. These results may have important implications for planet formation models, atmospheric models of {"}hot Jupiters,{"} and the success of transit surveys.",
keywords = "Celestial mechanics, Planetary systems: formation, Planetary systems: protoplanetary disks",
author = "Brian Jackson and Greenberg, {Richard J.} and Rory Barnes",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1086/529187",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "678",
pages = "1396--1406",
journal = "Astrophysical Journal",
issn = "0004-637X",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tidal evolution of close-in extrasolar planets

AU - Jackson, Brian

AU - Greenberg, Richard J.

AU - Barnes, Rory

PY - 2008/5/10

Y1 - 2008/5/10

N2 - The distribution of eccentricities e of extrasolar planets with semimajor axes a > 0.2 AU is very uniform, and values for e are relatively large, averaging 0.3 and broadly distributed up to near 1. For a < 0.2 AU, eccentricities are much smaller (most e < 0.2), a characteristic widely attributed to damping by tides after the planets formed and the protoplanetary gas disk dissipated. Most previous estimates of the tidal damping considered the tides raised on the planets, but ignored the tides raised on the stars. Most also assumed specific values for the planets' poorly constrained tidal dissipation parameter Qp. Perhaps most important, in many studies the strongly coupled evolution between e and a was ignored. We have now integrated the coupled tidal evolution equations for e and a over the estimated age of each planet, and confirmed that the distribution of initial e values of close-in planets matches that of the general population for reasonable Q values, with the best fits for stellar and planetary Q being ∼105.5 and ∼106.5, respectively. The accompanying evolution of a values shows most close-in planets had significantly larger a at the start of tidal migration. The earlier gas disk migration did not bring all planets to their current orbits. The current small values of a were only reached gradually due to tides over the lifetimes of the planets. These results may have important implications for planet formation models, atmospheric models of "hot Jupiters," and the success of transit surveys.

AB - The distribution of eccentricities e of extrasolar planets with semimajor axes a > 0.2 AU is very uniform, and values for e are relatively large, averaging 0.3 and broadly distributed up to near 1. For a < 0.2 AU, eccentricities are much smaller (most e < 0.2), a characteristic widely attributed to damping by tides after the planets formed and the protoplanetary gas disk dissipated. Most previous estimates of the tidal damping considered the tides raised on the planets, but ignored the tides raised on the stars. Most also assumed specific values for the planets' poorly constrained tidal dissipation parameter Qp. Perhaps most important, in many studies the strongly coupled evolution between e and a was ignored. We have now integrated the coupled tidal evolution equations for e and a over the estimated age of each planet, and confirmed that the distribution of initial e values of close-in planets matches that of the general population for reasonable Q values, with the best fits for stellar and planetary Q being ∼105.5 and ∼106.5, respectively. The accompanying evolution of a values shows most close-in planets had significantly larger a at the start of tidal migration. The earlier gas disk migration did not bring all planets to their current orbits. The current small values of a were only reached gradually due to tides over the lifetimes of the planets. These results may have important implications for planet formation models, atmospheric models of "hot Jupiters," and the success of transit surveys.

KW - Celestial mechanics

KW - Planetary systems: formation

KW - Planetary systems: protoplanetary disks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43949133839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43949133839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/529187

DO - 10.1086/529187

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:43949133839

VL - 678

SP - 1396

EP - 1406

JO - Astrophysical Journal

JF - Astrophysical Journal

SN - 0004-637X

IS - 2

ER -