Tiknohov regularization as a tool for assimilating soil moisture data in distributed hydrological models

E. E. Van Loon, Peter A Troch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Discharge, water table depth, and soil moisture content have been observed at a high spatial and temporal resolution in a 44 ha catchment in Costa Rica over a period of 5 months. On the basis of the observations in the first 3 months (period A), two distinct soil moisture models are identified and calibrated: a linear stochastic time-varying state-space model, and a geo-statistical model. Both models are defined at various spatial and temporal resolutions. For the subsequent period of 2 months (period B), four different ways to predict the soil moisture dynamics in the catchment are compared: (1) the application of the dynamic models in open-loop form; (2) a re-calibration of the dynamic models with soil moisture data in period B, and subsequent prediction in open-loop form; (3) prediction with the geostatistical models, using the soil moisture data in period B; (4) prediction by combining the outcomes of (1) and (3) via generalized cross-validation. The last method, which is a form of data assimilation, compares favourably with the three alternatives. Over a range of resolutions, the predictions by data assimilation have overall uncertainties that are approximately half that of the other prediction methods and have a favourable error structure (i.e. close to Gaussian) over space as well as time. In addition, data assimilation gives optimal predictions at finer resolutions compared with the other methods. Compared with prediction with the models in open-loop form, both re-calibration with soil moisture observations and data assimilation result in enhanced discharge predictions, whereas the prediction of ground water depths is not improved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-556
Number of pages26
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

soil moisture
prediction
data assimilation
catchment
calibration
water table
moisture content
water depth
groundwater
method

Keywords

  • Catchment scale
  • Data assimilation
  • Generalized cross-validation
  • Regularization
  • Soil moisture prediction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Tiknohov regularization as a tool for assimilating soil moisture data in distributed hydrological models. / Van Loon, E. E.; Troch, Peter A.

In: Hydrological Processes, Vol. 16, No. 2, 15.02.2002, p. 531-556.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43926f6a7b164b129069ac8b528dda9b,
title = "Tiknohov regularization as a tool for assimilating soil moisture data in distributed hydrological models",
abstract = "Discharge, water table depth, and soil moisture content have been observed at a high spatial and temporal resolution in a 44 ha catchment in Costa Rica over a period of 5 months. On the basis of the observations in the first 3 months (period A), two distinct soil moisture models are identified and calibrated: a linear stochastic time-varying state-space model, and a geo-statistical model. Both models are defined at various spatial and temporal resolutions. For the subsequent period of 2 months (period B), four different ways to predict the soil moisture dynamics in the catchment are compared: (1) the application of the dynamic models in open-loop form; (2) a re-calibration of the dynamic models with soil moisture data in period B, and subsequent prediction in open-loop form; (3) prediction with the geostatistical models, using the soil moisture data in period B; (4) prediction by combining the outcomes of (1) and (3) via generalized cross-validation. The last method, which is a form of data assimilation, compares favourably with the three alternatives. Over a range of resolutions, the predictions by data assimilation have overall uncertainties that are approximately half that of the other prediction methods and have a favourable error structure (i.e. close to Gaussian) over space as well as time. In addition, data assimilation gives optimal predictions at finer resolutions compared with the other methods. Compared with prediction with the models in open-loop form, both re-calibration with soil moisture observations and data assimilation result in enhanced discharge predictions, whereas the prediction of ground water depths is not improved.",
keywords = "Catchment scale, Data assimilation, Generalized cross-validation, Regularization, Soil moisture prediction",
author = "{Van Loon}, {E. E.} and Troch, {Peter A}",
year = "2002",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.352",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "531--556",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tiknohov regularization as a tool for assimilating soil moisture data in distributed hydrological models

AU - Van Loon, E. E.

AU - Troch, Peter A

PY - 2002/2/15

Y1 - 2002/2/15

N2 - Discharge, water table depth, and soil moisture content have been observed at a high spatial and temporal resolution in a 44 ha catchment in Costa Rica over a period of 5 months. On the basis of the observations in the first 3 months (period A), two distinct soil moisture models are identified and calibrated: a linear stochastic time-varying state-space model, and a geo-statistical model. Both models are defined at various spatial and temporal resolutions. For the subsequent period of 2 months (period B), four different ways to predict the soil moisture dynamics in the catchment are compared: (1) the application of the dynamic models in open-loop form; (2) a re-calibration of the dynamic models with soil moisture data in period B, and subsequent prediction in open-loop form; (3) prediction with the geostatistical models, using the soil moisture data in period B; (4) prediction by combining the outcomes of (1) and (3) via generalized cross-validation. The last method, which is a form of data assimilation, compares favourably with the three alternatives. Over a range of resolutions, the predictions by data assimilation have overall uncertainties that are approximately half that of the other prediction methods and have a favourable error structure (i.e. close to Gaussian) over space as well as time. In addition, data assimilation gives optimal predictions at finer resolutions compared with the other methods. Compared with prediction with the models in open-loop form, both re-calibration with soil moisture observations and data assimilation result in enhanced discharge predictions, whereas the prediction of ground water depths is not improved.

AB - Discharge, water table depth, and soil moisture content have been observed at a high spatial and temporal resolution in a 44 ha catchment in Costa Rica over a period of 5 months. On the basis of the observations in the first 3 months (period A), two distinct soil moisture models are identified and calibrated: a linear stochastic time-varying state-space model, and a geo-statistical model. Both models are defined at various spatial and temporal resolutions. For the subsequent period of 2 months (period B), four different ways to predict the soil moisture dynamics in the catchment are compared: (1) the application of the dynamic models in open-loop form; (2) a re-calibration of the dynamic models with soil moisture data in period B, and subsequent prediction in open-loop form; (3) prediction with the geostatistical models, using the soil moisture data in period B; (4) prediction by combining the outcomes of (1) and (3) via generalized cross-validation. The last method, which is a form of data assimilation, compares favourably with the three alternatives. Over a range of resolutions, the predictions by data assimilation have overall uncertainties that are approximately half that of the other prediction methods and have a favourable error structure (i.e. close to Gaussian) over space as well as time. In addition, data assimilation gives optimal predictions at finer resolutions compared with the other methods. Compared with prediction with the models in open-loop form, both re-calibration with soil moisture observations and data assimilation result in enhanced discharge predictions, whereas the prediction of ground water depths is not improved.

KW - Catchment scale

KW - Data assimilation

KW - Generalized cross-validation

KW - Regularization

KW - Soil moisture prediction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037083499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037083499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.352

DO - 10.1002/hyp.352

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0037083499

VL - 16

SP - 531

EP - 556

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 2

ER -