Time and space in general models of antipredator response: tests with wolves and elk

Scott Creel, John A. Winnie, David A Christianson, Stewart Liley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Considerable research has tested two axioms about antipredator behaviour: prey may respond to temporal variation in risk (the risky times hypothesis) or to spatial variation in risk (the risky places hypothesis). The risk allocation hypothesis extends the risky times hypothesis, noting that the context into which a period of risk or safety is imbedded should affect the level of response, and predicting that vigilance should be greatest during a brief pulse of risk and lowest during a brief pulse of safety. We tested these models using natural variation in true predation risk, by observing elk, Cervus elaphus, in the presence or absence of wolves, Canis lupus, on three sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, over 4 winters. Elk were exposed to wolves frequently in the Northern Range, intermittently in the Gallatin Canyon, and never in the Elkhorn Mountains. We used GLM to control the effects of herd size and composition while testing for responses of vigilance to daily wolf presence (temporal variation) and to site-specific, background levels of risk (spatial variation). The data gave strong support to the risk allocation hypothesis and equivocal support to the risky times hypothesis, and did not support the risky places hypothesis. Contrary to the risky places hypothesis but as predicted by risk allocation, Gallatin elk were more vigilant than Northern Range elk despite lower background risk in the Gallatin Canyon. The contradictory predictions of the risk allocation and risky places hypotheses have important ramifications for research on the ecological consequences of antipredator behaviour.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1139-1146
Number of pages8
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume76
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

elks
wolves
space and time
testing
vigilance
canyons
canyon
temporal variation
spatial variation
test
safety
predation risk
Canis lupus
background level
herd size
Cervus elaphus
environmental impact
mountains
predation
mountain

Keywords

  • Canis lupus
  • Cervus elaphus
  • elk
  • predation
  • risk allocation hypothesis
  • risk effect
  • vigilance
  • wolf
  • Yellowstone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Time and space in general models of antipredator response : tests with wolves and elk. / Creel, Scott; Winnie, John A.; Christianson, David A; Liley, Stewart.

In: Animal Behaviour, Vol. 76, No. 4, 10.2008, p. 1139-1146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Creel, Scott ; Winnie, John A. ; Christianson, David A ; Liley, Stewart. / Time and space in general models of antipredator response : tests with wolves and elk. In: Animal Behaviour. 2008 ; Vol. 76, No. 4. pp. 1139-1146.
@article{743b426e53a940638ab0a0f3aa0b276e,
title = "Time and space in general models of antipredator response: tests with wolves and elk",
abstract = "Considerable research has tested two axioms about antipredator behaviour: prey may respond to temporal variation in risk (the risky times hypothesis) or to spatial variation in risk (the risky places hypothesis). The risk allocation hypothesis extends the risky times hypothesis, noting that the context into which a period of risk or safety is imbedded should affect the level of response, and predicting that vigilance should be greatest during a brief pulse of risk and lowest during a brief pulse of safety. We tested these models using natural variation in true predation risk, by observing elk, Cervus elaphus, in the presence or absence of wolves, Canis lupus, on three sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, over 4 winters. Elk were exposed to wolves frequently in the Northern Range, intermittently in the Gallatin Canyon, and never in the Elkhorn Mountains. We used GLM to control the effects of herd size and composition while testing for responses of vigilance to daily wolf presence (temporal variation) and to site-specific, background levels of risk (spatial variation). The data gave strong support to the risk allocation hypothesis and equivocal support to the risky times hypothesis, and did not support the risky places hypothesis. Contrary to the risky places hypothesis but as predicted by risk allocation, Gallatin elk were more vigilant than Northern Range elk despite lower background risk in the Gallatin Canyon. The contradictory predictions of the risk allocation and risky places hypotheses have important ramifications for research on the ecological consequences of antipredator behaviour.",
keywords = "Canis lupus, Cervus elaphus, elk, predation, risk allocation hypothesis, risk effect, vigilance, wolf, Yellowstone",
author = "Scott Creel and Winnie, {John A.} and Christianson, {David A} and Stewart Liley",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "1139--1146",
journal = "Animal Behaviour",
issn = "0003-3472",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time and space in general models of antipredator response

T2 - tests with wolves and elk

AU - Creel, Scott

AU - Winnie, John A.

AU - Christianson, David A

AU - Liley, Stewart

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Considerable research has tested two axioms about antipredator behaviour: prey may respond to temporal variation in risk (the risky times hypothesis) or to spatial variation in risk (the risky places hypothesis). The risk allocation hypothesis extends the risky times hypothesis, noting that the context into which a period of risk or safety is imbedded should affect the level of response, and predicting that vigilance should be greatest during a brief pulse of risk and lowest during a brief pulse of safety. We tested these models using natural variation in true predation risk, by observing elk, Cervus elaphus, in the presence or absence of wolves, Canis lupus, on three sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, over 4 winters. Elk were exposed to wolves frequently in the Northern Range, intermittently in the Gallatin Canyon, and never in the Elkhorn Mountains. We used GLM to control the effects of herd size and composition while testing for responses of vigilance to daily wolf presence (temporal variation) and to site-specific, background levels of risk (spatial variation). The data gave strong support to the risk allocation hypothesis and equivocal support to the risky times hypothesis, and did not support the risky places hypothesis. Contrary to the risky places hypothesis but as predicted by risk allocation, Gallatin elk were more vigilant than Northern Range elk despite lower background risk in the Gallatin Canyon. The contradictory predictions of the risk allocation and risky places hypotheses have important ramifications for research on the ecological consequences of antipredator behaviour.

AB - Considerable research has tested two axioms about antipredator behaviour: prey may respond to temporal variation in risk (the risky times hypothesis) or to spatial variation in risk (the risky places hypothesis). The risk allocation hypothesis extends the risky times hypothesis, noting that the context into which a period of risk or safety is imbedded should affect the level of response, and predicting that vigilance should be greatest during a brief pulse of risk and lowest during a brief pulse of safety. We tested these models using natural variation in true predation risk, by observing elk, Cervus elaphus, in the presence or absence of wolves, Canis lupus, on three sites in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, over 4 winters. Elk were exposed to wolves frequently in the Northern Range, intermittently in the Gallatin Canyon, and never in the Elkhorn Mountains. We used GLM to control the effects of herd size and composition while testing for responses of vigilance to daily wolf presence (temporal variation) and to site-specific, background levels of risk (spatial variation). The data gave strong support to the risk allocation hypothesis and equivocal support to the risky times hypothesis, and did not support the risky places hypothesis. Contrary to the risky places hypothesis but as predicted by risk allocation, Gallatin elk were more vigilant than Northern Range elk despite lower background risk in the Gallatin Canyon. The contradictory predictions of the risk allocation and risky places hypotheses have important ramifications for research on the ecological consequences of antipredator behaviour.

KW - Canis lupus

KW - Cervus elaphus

KW - elk

KW - predation

KW - risk allocation hypothesis

KW - risk effect

KW - vigilance

KW - wolf

KW - Yellowstone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51549104438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51549104438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:51549104438

VL - 76

SP - 1139

EP - 1146

JO - Animal Behaviour

JF - Animal Behaviour

SN - 0003-3472

IS - 4

ER -