Time to revisit? A predator’s previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches

S. Vijayan, J. K. Lee, J. Balaban-Feld, W. A. Mitchell, B. P. Kotler, Michael L Rosenzweig, T. T. Lotan, Z. Abramsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a heterogeneous environment containing multiple patches that may deplete and renew, a forager should be able to detect the quality of food resources within and among patches and choose to exploit them to best maximize returns. From the predator’s perspective, the behavioral responses of the prey in a patch will be perceived as depletion when they retreat to refuge and renewal when they reemerge. A predator encountering responsive prey should manage predation risk, and thus behavioral resource depression, by optimally timing its return time to the patch based on prey behavior. We evaluated the foraging decisions of a predator that encountered patches differing in size of the refuge and prey density. We used little egrets and goldfish as predators and prey in an environment that contained three patches (pools). We manipulated prey density and refuge size and availability (using covers) and observed predator foraging behavior. When the egret had previously caught a fish it did not discriminate between the pools, and the return time was similar for all cover types. The fish densities also did not affect the egret decisions to return to pools. However, when it failed to catch fish, it returned sooner to the pool containing the small cover than the larger one. Additionally, after failing to catch fish in patches containing the highest prey density, the egrets subsequently preferred to return to such patches sooner. We show experimentally that previous failures influence the foraging decisions of a predator choosing how quickly to return to a previously visited patch.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-397
Number of pages11
JournalOecologia
Volume190
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

prey capture
predator
predators
refuge
foraging
fish
goldfish
predation risk
resource
behavioral response
foraging behavior
food quality
predation
food
decision

Keywords

  • Cover
  • Foraging
  • Goldfish
  • Little egret
  • Patch
  • Predation
  • Prey
  • Return time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Time to revisit? A predator’s previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches. / Vijayan, S.; Lee, J. K.; Balaban-Feld, J.; Mitchell, W. A.; Kotler, B. P.; Rosenzweig, Michael L; Lotan, T. T.; Abramsky, Z.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 190, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 387-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vijayan, S, Lee, JK, Balaban-Feld, J, Mitchell, WA, Kotler, BP, Rosenzweig, ML, Lotan, TT & Abramsky, Z 2019, 'Time to revisit? A predator’s previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches', Oecologia, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04425-w
Vijayan, S. ; Lee, J. K. ; Balaban-Feld, J. ; Mitchell, W. A. ; Kotler, B. P. ; Rosenzweig, Michael L ; Lotan, T. T. ; Abramsky, Z. / Time to revisit? A predator’s previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches. In: Oecologia. 2019 ; Vol. 190, No. 2. pp. 387-397.
@article{e9bb49a640714e139151bed590ed1e86,
title = "Time to revisit? A predator’s previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches",
abstract = "In a heterogeneous environment containing multiple patches that may deplete and renew, a forager should be able to detect the quality of food resources within and among patches and choose to exploit them to best maximize returns. From the predator’s perspective, the behavioral responses of the prey in a patch will be perceived as depletion when they retreat to refuge and renewal when they reemerge. A predator encountering responsive prey should manage predation risk, and thus behavioral resource depression, by optimally timing its return time to the patch based on prey behavior. We evaluated the foraging decisions of a predator that encountered patches differing in size of the refuge and prey density. We used little egrets and goldfish as predators and prey in an environment that contained three patches (pools). We manipulated prey density and refuge size and availability (using covers) and observed predator foraging behavior. When the egret had previously caught a fish it did not discriminate between the pools, and the return time was similar for all cover types. The fish densities also did not affect the egret decisions to return to pools. However, when it failed to catch fish, it returned sooner to the pool containing the small cover than the larger one. Additionally, after failing to catch fish in patches containing the highest prey density, the egrets subsequently preferred to return to such patches sooner. We show experimentally that previous failures influence the foraging decisions of a predator choosing how quickly to return to a previously visited patch.",
keywords = "Cover, Foraging, Goldfish, Little egret, Patch, Predation, Prey, Return time",
author = "S. Vijayan and Lee, {J. K.} and J. Balaban-Feld and Mitchell, {W. A.} and Kotler, {B. P.} and Rosenzweig, {Michael L} and Lotan, {T. T.} and Z. Abramsky",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00442-019-04425-w",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "190",
pages = "387--397",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8549",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to revisit? A predator’s previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches

AU - Vijayan, S.

AU - Lee, J. K.

AU - Balaban-Feld, J.

AU - Mitchell, W. A.

AU - Kotler, B. P.

AU - Rosenzweig, Michael L

AU - Lotan, T. T.

AU - Abramsky, Z.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - In a heterogeneous environment containing multiple patches that may deplete and renew, a forager should be able to detect the quality of food resources within and among patches and choose to exploit them to best maximize returns. From the predator’s perspective, the behavioral responses of the prey in a patch will be perceived as depletion when they retreat to refuge and renewal when they reemerge. A predator encountering responsive prey should manage predation risk, and thus behavioral resource depression, by optimally timing its return time to the patch based on prey behavior. We evaluated the foraging decisions of a predator that encountered patches differing in size of the refuge and prey density. We used little egrets and goldfish as predators and prey in an environment that contained three patches (pools). We manipulated prey density and refuge size and availability (using covers) and observed predator foraging behavior. When the egret had previously caught a fish it did not discriminate between the pools, and the return time was similar for all cover types. The fish densities also did not affect the egret decisions to return to pools. However, when it failed to catch fish, it returned sooner to the pool containing the small cover than the larger one. Additionally, after failing to catch fish in patches containing the highest prey density, the egrets subsequently preferred to return to such patches sooner. We show experimentally that previous failures influence the foraging decisions of a predator choosing how quickly to return to a previously visited patch.

AB - In a heterogeneous environment containing multiple patches that may deplete and renew, a forager should be able to detect the quality of food resources within and among patches and choose to exploit them to best maximize returns. From the predator’s perspective, the behavioral responses of the prey in a patch will be perceived as depletion when they retreat to refuge and renewal when they reemerge. A predator encountering responsive prey should manage predation risk, and thus behavioral resource depression, by optimally timing its return time to the patch based on prey behavior. We evaluated the foraging decisions of a predator that encountered patches differing in size of the refuge and prey density. We used little egrets and goldfish as predators and prey in an environment that contained three patches (pools). We manipulated prey density and refuge size and availability (using covers) and observed predator foraging behavior. When the egret had previously caught a fish it did not discriminate between the pools, and the return time was similar for all cover types. The fish densities also did not affect the egret decisions to return to pools. However, when it failed to catch fish, it returned sooner to the pool containing the small cover than the larger one. Additionally, after failing to catch fish in patches containing the highest prey density, the egrets subsequently preferred to return to such patches sooner. We show experimentally that previous failures influence the foraging decisions of a predator choosing how quickly to return to a previously visited patch.

KW - Cover

KW - Foraging

KW - Goldfish

KW - Little egret

KW - Patch

KW - Predation

KW - Prey

KW - Return time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066623007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066623007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00442-019-04425-w

DO - 10.1007/s00442-019-04425-w

M3 - Article

C2 - 31147778

AN - SCOPUS:85066623007

VL - 190

SP - 387

EP - 397

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8549

IS - 2

ER -