Timeliness and accuracy of reporting preliminary blood culture results: A college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of 65 institutions

Ronald B Schifman, Frederick A. Meier, Rhona J. Souers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context. - The speed and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports impacts patient management and outcomes. Objective. - To evaluate the accuracy and timeliness of preliminary blood culture results among multiple laboratories. Design. - Q-Probes participants collected turnaround time (TAT) data on preliminary Gram stains, compared accuracy of up to 100 preliminary to final culture Gram stain results, and described blood culture laboratory practices. Results. - Sixty-four laboratories and 5031 blood cultures were evaluated. All participants used continuously monitoring blood culture systems. Median TAT from initial growth detection to notification of results was 45 minutes, with the longest component being preparation of Gram stains (median time = 25 minutes). Participants (N = 40) reporting a continuous schedule for processing blood cultures had significantly lower overall TAT (median = 37 minutes) compared with 15 participants with intermittent processing schedules (median = 124 minutes), P =.003. Time to complete Gram stain processing was lower (median time = 21 minutes) for 39 participants using continuous processing schedule compared with 14 others (median time = 67 minutes), P =.03. Goals for total TAT were used by 27 of 56 participants (48.2%). Having goals did not significantly affect TAT. A total of 4962 of 5021 Gram stain results (98.8%) agreed with final culture results. The highest discrepancy rates occurred among gram-positive bacilli (20 of 335; 6.0%) and mixed cultures (22 of 106; 20.8%). Conclusions. - This study provides benchmarks for assessing blood culture quality performance. Timeliness and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports were excellent. However, nearly one-third of laboratories did not process blood cultures continuously. This significantly prolonged reporting results, which could affect patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-626
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume139
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Appointments and Schedules
Blood Culture
Pathologists
Benchmarking
Bacillus
Gram's stain
Growth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Timeliness and accuracy of reporting preliminary blood culture results : A college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of 65 institutions. / Schifman, Ronald B; Meier, Frederick A.; Souers, Rhona J.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 139, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 621-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{05b0ba306a244ea885e3017aef92a532,
title = "Timeliness and accuracy of reporting preliminary blood culture results: A college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of 65 institutions",
abstract = "Context. - The speed and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports impacts patient management and outcomes. Objective. - To evaluate the accuracy and timeliness of preliminary blood culture results among multiple laboratories. Design. - Q-Probes participants collected turnaround time (TAT) data on preliminary Gram stains, compared accuracy of up to 100 preliminary to final culture Gram stain results, and described blood culture laboratory practices. Results. - Sixty-four laboratories and 5031 blood cultures were evaluated. All participants used continuously monitoring blood culture systems. Median TAT from initial growth detection to notification of results was 45 minutes, with the longest component being preparation of Gram stains (median time = 25 minutes). Participants (N = 40) reporting a continuous schedule for processing blood cultures had significantly lower overall TAT (median = 37 minutes) compared with 15 participants with intermittent processing schedules (median = 124 minutes), P =.003. Time to complete Gram stain processing was lower (median time = 21 minutes) for 39 participants using continuous processing schedule compared with 14 others (median time = 67 minutes), P =.03. Goals for total TAT were used by 27 of 56 participants (48.2{\%}). Having goals did not significantly affect TAT. A total of 4962 of 5021 Gram stain results (98.8{\%}) agreed with final culture results. The highest discrepancy rates occurred among gram-positive bacilli (20 of 335; 6.0{\%}) and mixed cultures (22 of 106; 20.8{\%}). Conclusions. - This study provides benchmarks for assessing blood culture quality performance. Timeliness and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports were excellent. However, nearly one-third of laboratories did not process blood cultures continuously. This significantly prolonged reporting results, which could affect patient outcomes.",
author = "Schifman, {Ronald B} and Meier, {Frederick A.} and Souers, {Rhona J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5858/arpa.2014-0258-CP",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "621--626",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timeliness and accuracy of reporting preliminary blood culture results

T2 - A college of American pathologists Q-Probes study of 65 institutions

AU - Schifman, Ronald B

AU - Meier, Frederick A.

AU - Souers, Rhona J.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Context. - The speed and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports impacts patient management and outcomes. Objective. - To evaluate the accuracy and timeliness of preliminary blood culture results among multiple laboratories. Design. - Q-Probes participants collected turnaround time (TAT) data on preliminary Gram stains, compared accuracy of up to 100 preliminary to final culture Gram stain results, and described blood culture laboratory practices. Results. - Sixty-four laboratories and 5031 blood cultures were evaluated. All participants used continuously monitoring blood culture systems. Median TAT from initial growth detection to notification of results was 45 minutes, with the longest component being preparation of Gram stains (median time = 25 minutes). Participants (N = 40) reporting a continuous schedule for processing blood cultures had significantly lower overall TAT (median = 37 minutes) compared with 15 participants with intermittent processing schedules (median = 124 minutes), P =.003. Time to complete Gram stain processing was lower (median time = 21 minutes) for 39 participants using continuous processing schedule compared with 14 others (median time = 67 minutes), P =.03. Goals for total TAT were used by 27 of 56 participants (48.2%). Having goals did not significantly affect TAT. A total of 4962 of 5021 Gram stain results (98.8%) agreed with final culture results. The highest discrepancy rates occurred among gram-positive bacilli (20 of 335; 6.0%) and mixed cultures (22 of 106; 20.8%). Conclusions. - This study provides benchmarks for assessing blood culture quality performance. Timeliness and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports were excellent. However, nearly one-third of laboratories did not process blood cultures continuously. This significantly prolonged reporting results, which could affect patient outcomes.

AB - Context. - The speed and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports impacts patient management and outcomes. Objective. - To evaluate the accuracy and timeliness of preliminary blood culture results among multiple laboratories. Design. - Q-Probes participants collected turnaround time (TAT) data on preliminary Gram stains, compared accuracy of up to 100 preliminary to final culture Gram stain results, and described blood culture laboratory practices. Results. - Sixty-four laboratories and 5031 blood cultures were evaluated. All participants used continuously monitoring blood culture systems. Median TAT from initial growth detection to notification of results was 45 minutes, with the longest component being preparation of Gram stains (median time = 25 minutes). Participants (N = 40) reporting a continuous schedule for processing blood cultures had significantly lower overall TAT (median = 37 minutes) compared with 15 participants with intermittent processing schedules (median = 124 minutes), P =.003. Time to complete Gram stain processing was lower (median time = 21 minutes) for 39 participants using continuous processing schedule compared with 14 others (median time = 67 minutes), P =.03. Goals for total TAT were used by 27 of 56 participants (48.2%). Having goals did not significantly affect TAT. A total of 4962 of 5021 Gram stain results (98.8%) agreed with final culture results. The highest discrepancy rates occurred among gram-positive bacilli (20 of 335; 6.0%) and mixed cultures (22 of 106; 20.8%). Conclusions. - This study provides benchmarks for assessing blood culture quality performance. Timeliness and accuracy of preliminary blood culture reports were excellent. However, nearly one-third of laboratories did not process blood cultures continuously. This significantly prolonged reporting results, which could affect patient outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928962837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928962837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5858/arpa.2014-0258-CP

DO - 10.5858/arpa.2014-0258-CP

M3 - Article

C2 - 25927146

AN - SCOPUS:84928962837

VL - 139

SP - 621

EP - 626

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 5

ER -