Too counter-intuitive to believe? Pragmatic accounts of mixed quotation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intuitively, an utterance of: (1) Alice said that life is "difficult to understand" would not be true unless Alice uttered the very words "difficult to understand." However, several recent theories of "mixed quotation" contend that the intuition here is a misleading one. According to these theories, the truth conditions of (1) are identical to those of: (2) Alice said that life is difficult to understand. On such accounts, the quotation marks in (1) are of only pragmatic significance. That Alice uttered the quoted words is something the speaker might well convey in uttering (1); it is not something literally expressed by the utterance itself. Whatever its theoretical motivations, these contentions are undeniably counter-intuitive and the pragmaticist owes us an explanation of where they come from. This paper presents and evaluates various strategies that a pragmaticist with respect to mixed quotation might appeal to in an effort to explain the source of the counter-intuitive consequences of his theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-186
Number of pages20
JournalBelgian Journal of Linguistics
Volume17
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

quotation
pragmatics
intuition
appeal
Quotation
Utterance
Truth Conditions
Quotation Marks
Intuition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Too counter-intuitive to believe? Pragmatic accounts of mixed quotation. / Reimer, Margaret -.

In: Belgian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2003, p. 167-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f48282a0db8c44b3a8a930d33b2cba67,
title = "Too counter-intuitive to believe? Pragmatic accounts of mixed quotation",
abstract = "Intuitively, an utterance of: (1) Alice said that life is {"}difficult to understand{"} would not be true unless Alice uttered the very words {"}difficult to understand.{"} However, several recent theories of {"}mixed quotation{"} contend that the intuition here is a misleading one. According to these theories, the truth conditions of (1) are identical to those of: (2) Alice said that life is difficult to understand. On such accounts, the quotation marks in (1) are of only pragmatic significance. That Alice uttered the quoted words is something the speaker might well convey in uttering (1); it is not something literally expressed by the utterance itself. Whatever its theoretical motivations, these contentions are undeniably counter-intuitive and the pragmaticist owes us an explanation of where they come from. This paper presents and evaluates various strategies that a pragmaticist with respect to mixed quotation might appeal to in an effort to explain the source of the counter-intuitive consequences of his theory.",
author = "Reimer, {Margaret -}",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "167--186",
journal = "Belgian Journal of Linguistics",
issn = "0774-5141",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too counter-intuitive to believe? Pragmatic accounts of mixed quotation

AU - Reimer, Margaret -

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Intuitively, an utterance of: (1) Alice said that life is "difficult to understand" would not be true unless Alice uttered the very words "difficult to understand." However, several recent theories of "mixed quotation" contend that the intuition here is a misleading one. According to these theories, the truth conditions of (1) are identical to those of: (2) Alice said that life is difficult to understand. On such accounts, the quotation marks in (1) are of only pragmatic significance. That Alice uttered the quoted words is something the speaker might well convey in uttering (1); it is not something literally expressed by the utterance itself. Whatever its theoretical motivations, these contentions are undeniably counter-intuitive and the pragmaticist owes us an explanation of where they come from. This paper presents and evaluates various strategies that a pragmaticist with respect to mixed quotation might appeal to in an effort to explain the source of the counter-intuitive consequences of his theory.

AB - Intuitively, an utterance of: (1) Alice said that life is "difficult to understand" would not be true unless Alice uttered the very words "difficult to understand." However, several recent theories of "mixed quotation" contend that the intuition here is a misleading one. According to these theories, the truth conditions of (1) are identical to those of: (2) Alice said that life is difficult to understand. On such accounts, the quotation marks in (1) are of only pragmatic significance. That Alice uttered the quoted words is something the speaker might well convey in uttering (1); it is not something literally expressed by the utterance itself. Whatever its theoretical motivations, these contentions are undeniably counter-intuitive and the pragmaticist owes us an explanation of where they come from. This paper presents and evaluates various strategies that a pragmaticist with respect to mixed quotation might appeal to in an effort to explain the source of the counter-intuitive consequences of his theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248692879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248692879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248692879

VL - 17

SP - 167

EP - 186

JO - Belgian Journal of Linguistics

JF - Belgian Journal of Linguistics

SN - 0774-5141

IS - 1

ER -