Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy

Hoshin Vijai Gupta, Martyn P. Clark, Jasper A. Vrugt, Gab Abramowitz, Ming Ye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

216 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The past decade has seen significant progress in characterizing uncertainty in environmental systems models, through statistical treatment of incomplete knowledge regarding parameters, model structure, and observational data. Attention has now turned to the issue of model structural adequacy (MSA, a term we prefer over model structure "error"). In reviewing philosophical perspectives from the groundwater, unsaturated zone, terrestrial hydrometeorology, and surface water communities about how to model the terrestrial hydrosphere, we identify several areas where different subcommunities can learn from each other. In this paper, we (a) propose a consistent and systematic "unifying conceptual framework" consisting of five formal steps for comprehensive assessment of MSA; (b) discuss the need for a pluralistic definition of adequacy; (c) investigate how MSA has been addressed in the literature; and (d) identify four important issues that require detailed attentionstructured model evaluation, diagnosis of epistemic cause, attention to appropriate model complexity, and a multihypothesis approach to inference. We believe that there exists tremendous scope to collectively improve the scientific fidelity of our models and that the proposed framework can help to overcome barriers to communication. By doing so, we can make better progress toward addressing the question "How can we use data to detect, characterize, and resolve model structural inadequacies?".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberW08301
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume48
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

hydrometeorology
hydrosphere
conceptual framework
vadose zone
communication
surface water
groundwater
parameter
need
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy. / Gupta, Hoshin Vijai; Clark, Martyn P.; Vrugt, Jasper A.; Abramowitz, Gab; Ye, Ming.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, No. 8, W08301, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gupta, Hoshin Vijai ; Clark, Martyn P. ; Vrugt, Jasper A. ; Abramowitz, Gab ; Ye, Ming. / Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy. In: Water Resources Research. 2012 ; Vol. 48, No. 8.
@article{ecb07bdd2126433087427add433773ad,
title = "Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy",
abstract = "The past decade has seen significant progress in characterizing uncertainty in environmental systems models, through statistical treatment of incomplete knowledge regarding parameters, model structure, and observational data. Attention has now turned to the issue of model structural adequacy (MSA, a term we prefer over model structure {"}error{"}). In reviewing philosophical perspectives from the groundwater, unsaturated zone, terrestrial hydrometeorology, and surface water communities about how to model the terrestrial hydrosphere, we identify several areas where different subcommunities can learn from each other. In this paper, we (a) propose a consistent and systematic {"}unifying conceptual framework{"} consisting of five formal steps for comprehensive assessment of MSA; (b) discuss the need for a pluralistic definition of adequacy; (c) investigate how MSA has been addressed in the literature; and (d) identify four important issues that require detailed attentionstructured model evaluation, diagnosis of epistemic cause, attention to appropriate model complexity, and a multihypothesis approach to inference. We believe that there exists tremendous scope to collectively improve the scientific fidelity of our models and that the proposed framework can help to overcome barriers to communication. By doing so, we can make better progress toward addressing the question {"}How can we use data to detect, characterize, and resolve model structural inadequacies?{"}.",
author = "Gupta, {Hoshin Vijai} and Clark, {Martyn P.} and Vrugt, {Jasper A.} and Gab Abramowitz and Ming Ye",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1029/2011WR011044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy

AU - Gupta, Hoshin Vijai

AU - Clark, Martyn P.

AU - Vrugt, Jasper A.

AU - Abramowitz, Gab

AU - Ye, Ming

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The past decade has seen significant progress in characterizing uncertainty in environmental systems models, through statistical treatment of incomplete knowledge regarding parameters, model structure, and observational data. Attention has now turned to the issue of model structural adequacy (MSA, a term we prefer over model structure "error"). In reviewing philosophical perspectives from the groundwater, unsaturated zone, terrestrial hydrometeorology, and surface water communities about how to model the terrestrial hydrosphere, we identify several areas where different subcommunities can learn from each other. In this paper, we (a) propose a consistent and systematic "unifying conceptual framework" consisting of five formal steps for comprehensive assessment of MSA; (b) discuss the need for a pluralistic definition of adequacy; (c) investigate how MSA has been addressed in the literature; and (d) identify four important issues that require detailed attentionstructured model evaluation, diagnosis of epistemic cause, attention to appropriate model complexity, and a multihypothesis approach to inference. We believe that there exists tremendous scope to collectively improve the scientific fidelity of our models and that the proposed framework can help to overcome barriers to communication. By doing so, we can make better progress toward addressing the question "How can we use data to detect, characterize, and resolve model structural inadequacies?".

AB - The past decade has seen significant progress in characterizing uncertainty in environmental systems models, through statistical treatment of incomplete knowledge regarding parameters, model structure, and observational data. Attention has now turned to the issue of model structural adequacy (MSA, a term we prefer over model structure "error"). In reviewing philosophical perspectives from the groundwater, unsaturated zone, terrestrial hydrometeorology, and surface water communities about how to model the terrestrial hydrosphere, we identify several areas where different subcommunities can learn from each other. In this paper, we (a) propose a consistent and systematic "unifying conceptual framework" consisting of five formal steps for comprehensive assessment of MSA; (b) discuss the need for a pluralistic definition of adequacy; (c) investigate how MSA has been addressed in the literature; and (d) identify four important issues that require detailed attentionstructured model evaluation, diagnosis of epistemic cause, attention to appropriate model complexity, and a multihypothesis approach to inference. We believe that there exists tremendous scope to collectively improve the scientific fidelity of our models and that the proposed framework can help to overcome barriers to communication. By doing so, we can make better progress toward addressing the question "How can we use data to detect, characterize, and resolve model structural inadequacies?".

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865728764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865728764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2011WR011044

DO - 10.1029/2011WR011044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84865728764

VL - 48

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 8

M1 - W08301

ER -