Towards a theory of the American rural residential land market

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the late 1960s there has been a notable acceleration in America in the demand for rural residential land within commuting range of urban and suburban employment and service opportunities. American rural residential households do not seem to purchase acreage tracts primarily for their 'productive', or resource value, however. Instead, they purchase rural land for its 'consumptive' or residential value, as its value is primarily derived from the bundle of residential attributes associated with it. Over time, rural land within commuting range of metropolitan areas becomes underproductive and idled - a situation which precedes urban sprawl. Rural residential development has thus become a focus of debate on the effects and inefficiencies associated with urban sprawl. Yet, not enough is known about the nature of the rural residential land market. It is argued that American rural residential households are different from their suburban and urban counterparts for at least three reasons. First, they are distinguishable for their pursuit of self-sufficiency, self-expression, and the cultural status that a rural residential lifestyle offers. Second, they seek low cost rural jurisdictions in order to afford more housing and land than they could afford in higher cost urban and suburban locations. Third, they value distance from the city center colinearly with externalities such as pollution, crime, overcrowding, and noise associated with central city areas. In the latter sense, American rural residential households value land more highly the farther away it is from the city center, but discount land value the farther away it is from the boundary of urban development. In light of these considerations, this paper (a) reviews the literature describing the motivations of American rural residential households, (b) poses a theory of the American rural residential land market, (c) applies the theory to a case study, and (d) offers implications of the theory to planning efforts aimed at preserving resource land and containing urban sprawl.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-319
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

land market
residential areas
households
urbanization
markets
land values
market
urban sprawl
commuting
land value
crime
land resources
urban development
city center
overcrowding
purchase
Values
residential development
self sufficiency
lifestyle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Development
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Towards a theory of the American rural residential land market. / Nelson, Arthur Christian.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1986, p. 309-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47d5808baf8b4386b2b8567c0f8282ba,
title = "Towards a theory of the American rural residential land market",
abstract = "Since the late 1960s there has been a notable acceleration in America in the demand for rural residential land within commuting range of urban and suburban employment and service opportunities. American rural residential households do not seem to purchase acreage tracts primarily for their 'productive', or resource value, however. Instead, they purchase rural land for its 'consumptive' or residential value, as its value is primarily derived from the bundle of residential attributes associated with it. Over time, rural land within commuting range of metropolitan areas becomes underproductive and idled - a situation which precedes urban sprawl. Rural residential development has thus become a focus of debate on the effects and inefficiencies associated with urban sprawl. Yet, not enough is known about the nature of the rural residential land market. It is argued that American rural residential households are different from their suburban and urban counterparts for at least three reasons. First, they are distinguishable for their pursuit of self-sufficiency, self-expression, and the cultural status that a rural residential lifestyle offers. Second, they seek low cost rural jurisdictions in order to afford more housing and land than they could afford in higher cost urban and suburban locations. Third, they value distance from the city center colinearly with externalities such as pollution, crime, overcrowding, and noise associated with central city areas. In the latter sense, American rural residential households value land more highly the farther away it is from the city center, but discount land value the farther away it is from the boundary of urban development. In light of these considerations, this paper (a) reviews the literature describing the motivations of American rural residential households, (b) poses a theory of the American rural residential land market, (c) applies the theory to a case study, and (d) offers implications of the theory to planning efforts aimed at preserving resource land and containing urban sprawl.",
author = "Nelson, {Arthur Christian}",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1016/0743-0167(86)90029-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "309--319",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a theory of the American rural residential land market

AU - Nelson, Arthur Christian

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - Since the late 1960s there has been a notable acceleration in America in the demand for rural residential land within commuting range of urban and suburban employment and service opportunities. American rural residential households do not seem to purchase acreage tracts primarily for their 'productive', or resource value, however. Instead, they purchase rural land for its 'consumptive' or residential value, as its value is primarily derived from the bundle of residential attributes associated with it. Over time, rural land within commuting range of metropolitan areas becomes underproductive and idled - a situation which precedes urban sprawl. Rural residential development has thus become a focus of debate on the effects and inefficiencies associated with urban sprawl. Yet, not enough is known about the nature of the rural residential land market. It is argued that American rural residential households are different from their suburban and urban counterparts for at least three reasons. First, they are distinguishable for their pursuit of self-sufficiency, self-expression, and the cultural status that a rural residential lifestyle offers. Second, they seek low cost rural jurisdictions in order to afford more housing and land than they could afford in higher cost urban and suburban locations. Third, they value distance from the city center colinearly with externalities such as pollution, crime, overcrowding, and noise associated with central city areas. In the latter sense, American rural residential households value land more highly the farther away it is from the city center, but discount land value the farther away it is from the boundary of urban development. In light of these considerations, this paper (a) reviews the literature describing the motivations of American rural residential households, (b) poses a theory of the American rural residential land market, (c) applies the theory to a case study, and (d) offers implications of the theory to planning efforts aimed at preserving resource land and containing urban sprawl.

AB - Since the late 1960s there has been a notable acceleration in America in the demand for rural residential land within commuting range of urban and suburban employment and service opportunities. American rural residential households do not seem to purchase acreage tracts primarily for their 'productive', or resource value, however. Instead, they purchase rural land for its 'consumptive' or residential value, as its value is primarily derived from the bundle of residential attributes associated with it. Over time, rural land within commuting range of metropolitan areas becomes underproductive and idled - a situation which precedes urban sprawl. Rural residential development has thus become a focus of debate on the effects and inefficiencies associated with urban sprawl. Yet, not enough is known about the nature of the rural residential land market. It is argued that American rural residential households are different from their suburban and urban counterparts for at least three reasons. First, they are distinguishable for their pursuit of self-sufficiency, self-expression, and the cultural status that a rural residential lifestyle offers. Second, they seek low cost rural jurisdictions in order to afford more housing and land than they could afford in higher cost urban and suburban locations. Third, they value distance from the city center colinearly with externalities such as pollution, crime, overcrowding, and noise associated with central city areas. In the latter sense, American rural residential households value land more highly the farther away it is from the city center, but discount land value the farther away it is from the boundary of urban development. In light of these considerations, this paper (a) reviews the literature describing the motivations of American rural residential households, (b) poses a theory of the American rural residential land market, (c) applies the theory to a case study, and (d) offers implications of the theory to planning efforts aimed at preserving resource land and containing urban sprawl.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022887420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022887420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0743-0167(86)90029-X

DO - 10.1016/0743-0167(86)90029-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022887420

VL - 2

SP - 309

EP - 319

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

IS - 4

ER -