Trade agreements as protection from risk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction How do governments protect themselves from global market risk? The costs and benefits of globalisation cannot be measured solely in terms of predictable changes in trade. Rather, unpredictable changes - or volatility - in trade flows are also associated with high costs. As with any form of risk in the marketplace, volatility significantly dampens economic activity and reduces welfare. The adverse effects are felt at all levels of the market. In the aggregate, volatility destabilises exchange rates, inflates budget deficits and leads to more frequent and more extreme business cycles (Aizenman and Riera-Crichton 2008; Combes and Saadi-Sedik 2006). For individuals, it leads to decreases in wages and reduced job security (Scheve and Slaughter 2004). In general, domestic economies exposed to high levels of risk suffer many of the adverse welfare effects commonly linked to liberalisation (Blattman, Hwang and Williamson 2007). In light of these costs, governments have strong incentives to insulate their markets from global economic risk. Recent research shows that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) provide one form of insurance to states (Mansfield and Reinhardt 2008a). The core insight of this literature is that, by promoting the rule of international trade law, PTAs significantly reduce uncertainty in trade policy, which is a key source of market volatility. In the context of a more stable policy environment, members of trade agreements experience significantly less risk than nonmembers do.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTrade Cooperation
Subtitle of host publicationThe Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages408-432
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781316018453
ISBN (Print)9781107083875
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

market
costs
welfare
trade law
budget deficit
job security
business cycle
trade policy
world trade
international law
insurance
liberalization
economics
wage
incentive
globalization
uncertainty
economy
experience
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Kucik, J. (2015). Trade agreements as protection from risk. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements (pp. 408-432). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316018453.020

Trade agreements as protection from risk. / Kucik, Jeffrey.

Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 408-432.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kucik, J 2015, Trade agreements as protection from risk. in Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge University Press, pp. 408-432. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316018453.020
Kucik J. Trade agreements as protection from risk. In Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 408-432 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316018453.020
Kucik, Jeffrey. / Trade agreements as protection from risk. Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 408-432
@inbook{aaef6ab9aa59410ebe8ab5da67c52f04,
title = "Trade agreements as protection from risk",
abstract = "Introduction How do governments protect themselves from global market risk? The costs and benefits of globalisation cannot be measured solely in terms of predictable changes in trade. Rather, unpredictable changes - or volatility - in trade flows are also associated with high costs. As with any form of risk in the marketplace, volatility significantly dampens economic activity and reduces welfare. The adverse effects are felt at all levels of the market. In the aggregate, volatility destabilises exchange rates, inflates budget deficits and leads to more frequent and more extreme business cycles (Aizenman and Riera-Crichton 2008; Combes and Saadi-Sedik 2006). For individuals, it leads to decreases in wages and reduced job security (Scheve and Slaughter 2004). In general, domestic economies exposed to high levels of risk suffer many of the adverse welfare effects commonly linked to liberalisation (Blattman, Hwang and Williamson 2007). In light of these costs, governments have strong incentives to insulate their markets from global economic risk. Recent research shows that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) provide one form of insurance to states (Mansfield and Reinhardt 2008a). The core insight of this literature is that, by promoting the rule of international trade law, PTAs significantly reduce uncertainty in trade policy, which is a key source of market volatility. In the context of a more stable policy environment, members of trade agreements experience significantly less risk than nonmembers do.",
author = "Jeffrey Kucik",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781316018453.020",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781107083875",
pages = "408--432",
booktitle = "Trade Cooperation",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Trade agreements as protection from risk

AU - Kucik, Jeffrey

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Introduction How do governments protect themselves from global market risk? The costs and benefits of globalisation cannot be measured solely in terms of predictable changes in trade. Rather, unpredictable changes - or volatility - in trade flows are also associated with high costs. As with any form of risk in the marketplace, volatility significantly dampens economic activity and reduces welfare. The adverse effects are felt at all levels of the market. In the aggregate, volatility destabilises exchange rates, inflates budget deficits and leads to more frequent and more extreme business cycles (Aizenman and Riera-Crichton 2008; Combes and Saadi-Sedik 2006). For individuals, it leads to decreases in wages and reduced job security (Scheve and Slaughter 2004). In general, domestic economies exposed to high levels of risk suffer many of the adverse welfare effects commonly linked to liberalisation (Blattman, Hwang and Williamson 2007). In light of these costs, governments have strong incentives to insulate their markets from global economic risk. Recent research shows that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) provide one form of insurance to states (Mansfield and Reinhardt 2008a). The core insight of this literature is that, by promoting the rule of international trade law, PTAs significantly reduce uncertainty in trade policy, which is a key source of market volatility. In the context of a more stable policy environment, members of trade agreements experience significantly less risk than nonmembers do.

AB - Introduction How do governments protect themselves from global market risk? The costs and benefits of globalisation cannot be measured solely in terms of predictable changes in trade. Rather, unpredictable changes - or volatility - in trade flows are also associated with high costs. As with any form of risk in the marketplace, volatility significantly dampens economic activity and reduces welfare. The adverse effects are felt at all levels of the market. In the aggregate, volatility destabilises exchange rates, inflates budget deficits and leads to more frequent and more extreme business cycles (Aizenman and Riera-Crichton 2008; Combes and Saadi-Sedik 2006). For individuals, it leads to decreases in wages and reduced job security (Scheve and Slaughter 2004). In general, domestic economies exposed to high levels of risk suffer many of the adverse welfare effects commonly linked to liberalisation (Blattman, Hwang and Williamson 2007). In light of these costs, governments have strong incentives to insulate their markets from global economic risk. Recent research shows that preferential trade agreements (PTAs) provide one form of insurance to states (Mansfield and Reinhardt 2008a). The core insight of this literature is that, by promoting the rule of international trade law, PTAs significantly reduce uncertainty in trade policy, which is a key source of market volatility. In the context of a more stable policy environment, members of trade agreements experience significantly less risk than nonmembers do.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953792221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953792221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781316018453.020

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781316018453.020

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84953792221

SN - 9781107083875

SP - 408

EP - 432

BT - Trade Cooperation

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -