Tradeoffs in carbon commodification: A political ecology of common property forest governance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Carbon markets have gained traction worldwide as an ostensibly win-win solution to climate change, providing low-cost emission reductions in the Global North and sustainable development in the Global South. However, sustainable development and livelihood co-benefits have largely failed to materialize in a range of carbon offset projects, particularly those in forest communities. While some scholars explain this failure as an outcome of fundamental tradeoffs between market efficiency and sustainable development, others argue that institutions of common property land tenure can resolve tradeoffs and generate important co-benefits for local communities. Using a political ecology approach, integrating insights of Karl Polanyi and Noel Castree on the commodification of nature and evidence from a carbon forestry project in Chiapas, Mexico, this article grapples with the ways in which carbon market requirements shape forest governance within common property tenure arrangements. I argue that the centralization of forest governance and decision making into the hands of project implementers and brokers, the necessity for legible land rights and boundaries, and the technical requirements for measurement, calculation, and monitoring of carbon have reshaped forest governance in ways that have undermined the social and ecological benefits often associated with common property management schemes. This research therefore demonstrates that so-called tradeoffs between market efficiency and equitable sustainable development goals may not be inherent to carbon forestry and calls into question the reliance on disembedding market mechanisms for climate change mitigation in forest ecosystems. As such, this work has important implications for REDD+.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-77
Number of pages14
JournalGeoforum
Volume67
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

common property
environmental policy
governance
sustainable development
market
forestry
climate change
efficiency
market mechanism
centralization
livelihood
Mexico
monitoring
decision making
costs
management
community
evidence

Keywords

  • Carbon market
  • Carbon offsets
  • Commodification of nature
  • Forest governance
  • Mexico
  • Political ecology
  • REDD+

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Tradeoffs in carbon commodification : A political ecology of common property forest governance. / Osborne, Tracey.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 67, 01.12.2015, p. 64-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f1571a18273478cb6dd710c7ed7b012,
title = "Tradeoffs in carbon commodification: A political ecology of common property forest governance",
abstract = "Carbon markets have gained traction worldwide as an ostensibly win-win solution to climate change, providing low-cost emission reductions in the Global North and sustainable development in the Global South. However, sustainable development and livelihood co-benefits have largely failed to materialize in a range of carbon offset projects, particularly those in forest communities. While some scholars explain this failure as an outcome of fundamental tradeoffs between market efficiency and sustainable development, others argue that institutions of common property land tenure can resolve tradeoffs and generate important co-benefits for local communities. Using a political ecology approach, integrating insights of Karl Polanyi and Noel Castree on the commodification of nature and evidence from a carbon forestry project in Chiapas, Mexico, this article grapples with the ways in which carbon market requirements shape forest governance within common property tenure arrangements. I argue that the centralization of forest governance and decision making into the hands of project implementers and brokers, the necessity for legible land rights and boundaries, and the technical requirements for measurement, calculation, and monitoring of carbon have reshaped forest governance in ways that have undermined the social and ecological benefits often associated with common property management schemes. This research therefore demonstrates that so-called tradeoffs between market efficiency and equitable sustainable development goals may not be inherent to carbon forestry and calls into question the reliance on disembedding market mechanisms for climate change mitigation in forest ecosystems. As such, this work has important implications for REDD+.",
keywords = "Carbon market, Carbon offsets, Commodification of nature, Forest governance, Mexico, Political ecology, REDD+",
author = "Tracey Osborne",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "64--77",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tradeoffs in carbon commodification

T2 - A political ecology of common property forest governance

AU - Osborne, Tracey

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Carbon markets have gained traction worldwide as an ostensibly win-win solution to climate change, providing low-cost emission reductions in the Global North and sustainable development in the Global South. However, sustainable development and livelihood co-benefits have largely failed to materialize in a range of carbon offset projects, particularly those in forest communities. While some scholars explain this failure as an outcome of fundamental tradeoffs between market efficiency and sustainable development, others argue that institutions of common property land tenure can resolve tradeoffs and generate important co-benefits for local communities. Using a political ecology approach, integrating insights of Karl Polanyi and Noel Castree on the commodification of nature and evidence from a carbon forestry project in Chiapas, Mexico, this article grapples with the ways in which carbon market requirements shape forest governance within common property tenure arrangements. I argue that the centralization of forest governance and decision making into the hands of project implementers and brokers, the necessity for legible land rights and boundaries, and the technical requirements for measurement, calculation, and monitoring of carbon have reshaped forest governance in ways that have undermined the social and ecological benefits often associated with common property management schemes. This research therefore demonstrates that so-called tradeoffs between market efficiency and equitable sustainable development goals may not be inherent to carbon forestry and calls into question the reliance on disembedding market mechanisms for climate change mitigation in forest ecosystems. As such, this work has important implications for REDD+.

AB - Carbon markets have gained traction worldwide as an ostensibly win-win solution to climate change, providing low-cost emission reductions in the Global North and sustainable development in the Global South. However, sustainable development and livelihood co-benefits have largely failed to materialize in a range of carbon offset projects, particularly those in forest communities. While some scholars explain this failure as an outcome of fundamental tradeoffs between market efficiency and sustainable development, others argue that institutions of common property land tenure can resolve tradeoffs and generate important co-benefits for local communities. Using a political ecology approach, integrating insights of Karl Polanyi and Noel Castree on the commodification of nature and evidence from a carbon forestry project in Chiapas, Mexico, this article grapples with the ways in which carbon market requirements shape forest governance within common property tenure arrangements. I argue that the centralization of forest governance and decision making into the hands of project implementers and brokers, the necessity for legible land rights and boundaries, and the technical requirements for measurement, calculation, and monitoring of carbon have reshaped forest governance in ways that have undermined the social and ecological benefits often associated with common property management schemes. This research therefore demonstrates that so-called tradeoffs between market efficiency and equitable sustainable development goals may not be inherent to carbon forestry and calls into question the reliance on disembedding market mechanisms for climate change mitigation in forest ecosystems. As such, this work has important implications for REDD+.

KW - Carbon market

KW - Carbon offsets

KW - Commodification of nature

KW - Forest governance

KW - Mexico

KW - Political ecology

KW - REDD+

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945561340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945561340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945561340

VL - 67

SP - 64

EP - 77

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -