Training professionals to detect deception

Joey F. George, David P. Biros, Judee K Burgoon, Jay F Nunamaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and post-tests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)366-370
Number of pages5
JournalLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume2665
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Deception
Communication
Tape Recording
Pre-test
Aptitude
Military
Heuristics
Training
Knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Theoretical Computer Science

Cite this

@article{fa65edb6030f4b5d99eeeaec30658464,
title = "Training professionals to detect deception",
abstract = "Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and post-tests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy.",
author = "George, {Joey F.} and Biros, {David P.} and Burgoon, {Judee K} and Nunamaker, {Jay F}",
year = "2003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2665",
pages = "366--370",
journal = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
issn = "0302-9743",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training professionals to detect deception

AU - George, Joey F.

AU - Biros, David P.

AU - Burgoon, Judee K

AU - Nunamaker, Jay F

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and post-tests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy.

AB - Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and post-tests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35048829443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35048829443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2665

SP - 366

EP - 370

JO - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

JF - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

SN - 0302-9743

ER -