Training to detect deception

An experimental investigation

Joey F. George, Kent Marett, Judee K Burgoon, Janna Crews, Jinwei Cao, Ming Lin, David P. Biros

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and posttests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy. In addition, individuals who received training using specially developed software did as well as individuals who were trained by lecture or by lecture and software in combination, for both knowledge and detection accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
EditorsR.H. Sprague Jr.
Pages347-356
Number of pages10
Volume37
StatePublished - 2004
EventProceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - Big Island, HI., United States
Duration: Jan 5 2004Jan 8 2004

Other

OtherProceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
CountryUnited States
CityBig Island, HI.
Period1/5/041/8/04

Fingerprint

Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

George, J. F., Marett, K., Burgoon, J. K., Crews, J., Cao, J., Lin, M., & Biros, D. P. (2004). Training to detect deception: An experimental investigation. In R. H. Sprague Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 37, pp. 347-356). [CLDDN04]

Training to detect deception : An experimental investigation. / George, Joey F.; Marett, Kent; Burgoon, Judee K; Crews, Janna; Cao, Jinwei; Lin, Ming; Biros, David P.

Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. ed. / R.H. Sprague Jr. Vol. 37 2004. p. 347-356 CLDDN04.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

George, JF, Marett, K, Burgoon, JK, Crews, J, Cao, J, Lin, M & Biros, DP 2004, Training to detect deception: An experimental investigation. in RH Sprague Jr. (ed.), Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. vol. 37, CLDDN04, pp. 347-356, Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI., United States, 1/5/04.
George JF, Marett K, Burgoon JK, Crews J, Cao J, Lin M et al. Training to detect deception: An experimental investigation. In Sprague Jr. RH, editor, Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Vol. 37. 2004. p. 347-356. CLDDN04
George, Joey F. ; Marett, Kent ; Burgoon, Judee K ; Crews, Janna ; Cao, Jinwei ; Lin, Ming ; Biros, David P. / Training to detect deception : An experimental investigation. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. editor / R.H. Sprague Jr. Vol. 37 2004. pp. 347-356
@inproceedings{9e2c98f6896e4af2a23b2824477d89a8,
title = "Training to detect deception: An experimental investigation",
abstract = "Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and posttests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy. In addition, individuals who received training using specially developed software did as well as individuals who were trained by lecture or by lecture and software in combination, for both knowledge and detection accuracy.",
author = "George, {Joey F.} and Kent Marett and Burgoon, {Judee K} and Janna Crews and Jinwei Cao and Ming Lin and Biros, {David P.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "347--356",
editor = "{Sprague Jr.}, R.H.",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Training to detect deception

T2 - An experimental investigation

AU - George, Joey F.

AU - Marett, Kent

AU - Burgoon, Judee K

AU - Crews, Janna

AU - Cao, Jinwei

AU - Lin, Ming

AU - Biros, David P.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and posttests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy. In addition, individuals who received training using specially developed software did as well as individuals who were trained by lecture or by lecture and software in combination, for both knowledge and detection accuracy.

AB - Humans are not very good at detecting deception in normal communication. One possible remedy for improving detection accuracy is to educate people about various indicators of deception and then train them to spot these indicators when they are used in normal communication. This paper reports on one such training effort involving over 100 military officers. Participants received training on deception detection generally, on specific indicators, and on heuristics. They completed pre- and posttests on their knowledge in these areas and on their ability to detect deception. Detection accuracy was measured by asking participants to judge if behavior in a video, on an audiotape, or in a text passage was deceptive or honest. Trained individuals outperformed those who did not receive training on the knowledge tests, but there were no differences between the groups in detection accuracy. In addition, individuals who received training using specially developed software did as well as individuals who were trained by lecture or by lecture and software in combination, for both knowledge and detection accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12344313157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12344313157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 37

SP - 347

EP - 356

BT - Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

A2 - Sprague Jr., R.H.

ER -