Transcriptional regulation of mammalian genes in vivo. A tale of two templates

Catharine Smith, G. L. Hager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

207 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study of mammalian gene expression through the use of transient transfection assays has greatly expanded our knowledge of transcriptional mechanisms. However, transfected promotor constructs do not always serve as appropriate 'stand-ins' for endogenous genes, particularly in cases where chromatin remodeling must take place. The examples described above indicate that a level of caution is advised when studying regulation of various promoters and transcription factor function with the use of transient transfection assays. When possible, function of the corresponding endogenous promoters should be tested to assess the validity of regulatory mechanisms defined on transiently transfected, non-replicating templates. Future studies using template comparison as a tool will undoubtedly identify which transcription factors are critical in initiating essential changes in chromatin structure at endogenous target genes and assist in the elucidation of mechanisms involved in chromatin transitions. As in the MyoD experiments (36), these studies will also allow identification of functional domains in these factors, which are necessary for chromatin remodeling. Functional differences between transiently transfected and stable replicating templates need not be considered artifactual but rather can be exploited to identify and characterize regulatory mechanisms that involve chromatin components. Full understanding of gene expression in vivo will not be achieved until these mechanisms are understood in detail.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27493-27496
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Biological Chemistry
Volume272
Issue number44
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chromatin
Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly
Genes
Transfection
Transcription Factors
Gene Expression
Gene expression
Assays
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Transcriptional regulation of mammalian genes in vivo. A tale of two templates. / Smith, Catharine; Hager, G. L.

In: Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 272, No. 44, 1997, p. 27493-27496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{53a3a4d82a254c1cb861b826135d51e9,
title = "Transcriptional regulation of mammalian genes in vivo. A tale of two templates",
abstract = "The study of mammalian gene expression through the use of transient transfection assays has greatly expanded our knowledge of transcriptional mechanisms. However, transfected promotor constructs do not always serve as appropriate 'stand-ins' for endogenous genes, particularly in cases where chromatin remodeling must take place. The examples described above indicate that a level of caution is advised when studying regulation of various promoters and transcription factor function with the use of transient transfection assays. When possible, function of the corresponding endogenous promoters should be tested to assess the validity of regulatory mechanisms defined on transiently transfected, non-replicating templates. Future studies using template comparison as a tool will undoubtedly identify which transcription factors are critical in initiating essential changes in chromatin structure at endogenous target genes and assist in the elucidation of mechanisms involved in chromatin transitions. As in the MyoD experiments (36), these studies will also allow identification of functional domains in these factors, which are necessary for chromatin remodeling. Functional differences between transiently transfected and stable replicating templates need not be considered artifactual but rather can be exploited to identify and characterize regulatory mechanisms that involve chromatin components. Full understanding of gene expression in vivo will not be achieved until these mechanisms are understood in detail.",
author = "Catharine Smith and Hager, {G. L.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1074/jbc.272.44.27493",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "272",
pages = "27493--27496",
journal = "Journal of Biological Chemistry",
issn = "0021-9258",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.",
number = "44",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transcriptional regulation of mammalian genes in vivo. A tale of two templates

AU - Smith, Catharine

AU - Hager, G. L.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The study of mammalian gene expression through the use of transient transfection assays has greatly expanded our knowledge of transcriptional mechanisms. However, transfected promotor constructs do not always serve as appropriate 'stand-ins' for endogenous genes, particularly in cases where chromatin remodeling must take place. The examples described above indicate that a level of caution is advised when studying regulation of various promoters and transcription factor function with the use of transient transfection assays. When possible, function of the corresponding endogenous promoters should be tested to assess the validity of regulatory mechanisms defined on transiently transfected, non-replicating templates. Future studies using template comparison as a tool will undoubtedly identify which transcription factors are critical in initiating essential changes in chromatin structure at endogenous target genes and assist in the elucidation of mechanisms involved in chromatin transitions. As in the MyoD experiments (36), these studies will also allow identification of functional domains in these factors, which are necessary for chromatin remodeling. Functional differences between transiently transfected and stable replicating templates need not be considered artifactual but rather can be exploited to identify and characterize regulatory mechanisms that involve chromatin components. Full understanding of gene expression in vivo will not be achieved until these mechanisms are understood in detail.

AB - The study of mammalian gene expression through the use of transient transfection assays has greatly expanded our knowledge of transcriptional mechanisms. However, transfected promotor constructs do not always serve as appropriate 'stand-ins' for endogenous genes, particularly in cases where chromatin remodeling must take place. The examples described above indicate that a level of caution is advised when studying regulation of various promoters and transcription factor function with the use of transient transfection assays. When possible, function of the corresponding endogenous promoters should be tested to assess the validity of regulatory mechanisms defined on transiently transfected, non-replicating templates. Future studies using template comparison as a tool will undoubtedly identify which transcription factors are critical in initiating essential changes in chromatin structure at endogenous target genes and assist in the elucidation of mechanisms involved in chromatin transitions. As in the MyoD experiments (36), these studies will also allow identification of functional domains in these factors, which are necessary for chromatin remodeling. Functional differences between transiently transfected and stable replicating templates need not be considered artifactual but rather can be exploited to identify and characterize regulatory mechanisms that involve chromatin components. Full understanding of gene expression in vivo will not be achieved until these mechanisms are understood in detail.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030836229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030836229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27493

DO - 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27493

M3 - Article

C2 - 9346875

AN - SCOPUS:0030836229

VL - 272

SP - 27493

EP - 27496

JO - Journal of Biological Chemistry

JF - Journal of Biological Chemistry

SN - 0021-9258

IS - 44

ER -