Transfer of new learning in memory-impaired patients

M. A. Butters, Elizabeth L Glisky, D. L. Schacter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has produced conflicting evidence concerning transfer of new learning by amnesic patients. The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that different numbers of learning trials account for differences in transfer, such that the greater the number of repetitions of material in identical stimulus contexts the poorer the transfer. Six memory-impaired patients and six control subjects attempted to learn the names of business-related documents in response to descriptive definitions. Learning continued until one of the following criteria was reached: 50% correct, 100% correct, 100% correct plus 10 trials. In a transfer task, subjects were then asked to produce the target responses to altered definitional cues. The results of the experiment demonstrated that, contrary to prediction, transfer improved with numbers of learning trials. Results are consistent with the view that continued study of information allows better integration of new learning with prior knowledge and correspondingly higher levels of transfer. The theoretical implications of the findings are discussed in terms of the declarative/procedural and the episodic/semantic memory distinction. It is suggested that memory-impaired patients are capable of acquiring new semantic information although not at a normal rate. Implications for memory rehabilitation are also outlined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)219-230
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Volume15
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Learning
Semantics
Episodic Memory
Names
Cues
Transfer (Psychology)
Rehabilitation
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Transfer of new learning in memory-impaired patients. / Butters, M. A.; Glisky, Elizabeth L; Schacter, D. L.

In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1993, p. 219-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{49cfc4ee4b63429086718cf580cf8c61,
title = "Transfer of new learning in memory-impaired patients",
abstract = "Previous research has produced conflicting evidence concerning transfer of new learning by amnesic patients. The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that different numbers of learning trials account for differences in transfer, such that the greater the number of repetitions of material in identical stimulus contexts the poorer the transfer. Six memory-impaired patients and six control subjects attempted to learn the names of business-related documents in response to descriptive definitions. Learning continued until one of the following criteria was reached: 50{\%} correct, 100{\%} correct, 100{\%} correct plus 10 trials. In a transfer task, subjects were then asked to produce the target responses to altered definitional cues. The results of the experiment demonstrated that, contrary to prediction, transfer improved with numbers of learning trials. Results are consistent with the view that continued study of information allows better integration of new learning with prior knowledge and correspondingly higher levels of transfer. The theoretical implications of the findings are discussed in terms of the declarative/procedural and the episodic/semantic memory distinction. It is suggested that memory-impaired patients are capable of acquiring new semantic information although not at a normal rate. Implications for memory rehabilitation are also outlined.",
author = "Butters, {M. A.} and Glisky, {Elizabeth L} and Schacter, {D. L.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "219--230",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology",
issn = "0168-8634",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transfer of new learning in memory-impaired patients

AU - Butters, M. A.

AU - Glisky, Elizabeth L

AU - Schacter, D. L.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Previous research has produced conflicting evidence concerning transfer of new learning by amnesic patients. The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that different numbers of learning trials account for differences in transfer, such that the greater the number of repetitions of material in identical stimulus contexts the poorer the transfer. Six memory-impaired patients and six control subjects attempted to learn the names of business-related documents in response to descriptive definitions. Learning continued until one of the following criteria was reached: 50% correct, 100% correct, 100% correct plus 10 trials. In a transfer task, subjects were then asked to produce the target responses to altered definitional cues. The results of the experiment demonstrated that, contrary to prediction, transfer improved with numbers of learning trials. Results are consistent with the view that continued study of information allows better integration of new learning with prior knowledge and correspondingly higher levels of transfer. The theoretical implications of the findings are discussed in terms of the declarative/procedural and the episodic/semantic memory distinction. It is suggested that memory-impaired patients are capable of acquiring new semantic information although not at a normal rate. Implications for memory rehabilitation are also outlined.

AB - Previous research has produced conflicting evidence concerning transfer of new learning by amnesic patients. The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that different numbers of learning trials account for differences in transfer, such that the greater the number of repetitions of material in identical stimulus contexts the poorer the transfer. Six memory-impaired patients and six control subjects attempted to learn the names of business-related documents in response to descriptive definitions. Learning continued until one of the following criteria was reached: 50% correct, 100% correct, 100% correct plus 10 trials. In a transfer task, subjects were then asked to produce the target responses to altered definitional cues. The results of the experiment demonstrated that, contrary to prediction, transfer improved with numbers of learning trials. Results are consistent with the view that continued study of information allows better integration of new learning with prior knowledge and correspondingly higher levels of transfer. The theoretical implications of the findings are discussed in terms of the declarative/procedural and the episodic/semantic memory distinction. It is suggested that memory-impaired patients are capable of acquiring new semantic information although not at a normal rate. Implications for memory rehabilitation are also outlined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027230792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027230792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8491847

AN - SCOPUS:0027230792

VL - 15

SP - 219

EP - 230

JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

SN - 0168-8634

IS - 2

ER -