Transformation of atrazine, carbamazepine, diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole by low and medium pressure UV and UV/H2O2 treatment

Karin Lekkerkerker-Teunissen, Mark J. Benotti, Shane A Snyder, Hans C. Van Dijk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Differences in the degradation and transformation of atrazine (ATZ), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in deionized water during UV and UV/H2O2 treatment using lowpressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) UV lamps, were assessed using a collimated beam apparatus. UV doses ranged from 300700 mJ/cm2 and H2O2 doses ranged from 010 mg/L. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to measure concentrations of the parent compounds and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QToF-MS) was used to screen for transformation products following treatment. In general, there was little difference in compound degradation and transformation between LP and MP UV lamps in both UV and UV/H2O2 treatments. Removal of ATZ, SMX and DCF was largely attributed to direct photodegradation whereas CBZ was not appreciably removed by UV or UV/H2O2 treatment. All four compounds yielded transformation products following UV or UV/H2O2 treatment with LP and MP lamps. Transformation pathways were determined using accurate mass estimation to determine elemental composition, and relative abundance was determined using ion counts. For ATZ and CBZ, the transformation pathway was non-sequential, whereas for DCF and SMX, the transformation pathway was sequential. The approach outlined in this paper can be used to assess unknown transformation products formed during oxidation of organic micropollutants during water treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-43
Number of pages11
JournalSeparation and Purification Technology
Volume96
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 21 2012

Fingerprint

Atrazine
Sulfamethoxazole
Diclofenac
Herbicides
Carbamazepine
Ultraviolet lamps
Mass spectrometry
Degradation
Deionized water
Liquid chromatography
Photodegradation
Water treatment
Electric lamps
Dosimetry
Ions
Oxidation
Chemical analysis

Keywords

  • Advanced oxidation
  • By-product formation
  • Degradation pathway
  • Intensity counts
  • Organic micropollutants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Transformation of atrazine, carbamazepine, diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole by low and medium pressure UV and UV/H2O2 treatment. / Lekkerkerker-Teunissen, Karin; Benotti, Mark J.; Snyder, Shane A; Van Dijk, Hans C.

In: Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 96, 21.08.2012, p. 33-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4c0caf7c0e904b9bb49830959e039e7d,
title = "Transformation of atrazine, carbamazepine, diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole by low and medium pressure UV and UV/H2O2 treatment",
abstract = "Differences in the degradation and transformation of atrazine (ATZ), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in deionized water during UV and UV/H2O2 treatment using lowpressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) UV lamps, were assessed using a collimated beam apparatus. UV doses ranged from 300700 mJ/cm2 and H2O2 doses ranged from 010 mg/L. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to measure concentrations of the parent compounds and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QToF-MS) was used to screen for transformation products following treatment. In general, there was little difference in compound degradation and transformation between LP and MP UV lamps in both UV and UV/H2O2 treatments. Removal of ATZ, SMX and DCF was largely attributed to direct photodegradation whereas CBZ was not appreciably removed by UV or UV/H2O2 treatment. All four compounds yielded transformation products following UV or UV/H2O2 treatment with LP and MP lamps. Transformation pathways were determined using accurate mass estimation to determine elemental composition, and relative abundance was determined using ion counts. For ATZ and CBZ, the transformation pathway was non-sequential, whereas for DCF and SMX, the transformation pathway was sequential. The approach outlined in this paper can be used to assess unknown transformation products formed during oxidation of organic micropollutants during water treatment.",
keywords = "Advanced oxidation, By-product formation, Degradation pathway, Intensity counts, Organic micropollutants",
author = "Karin Lekkerkerker-Teunissen and Benotti, {Mark J.} and Snyder, {Shane A} and {Van Dijk}, {Hans C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "33--43",
journal = "Separation and Purification Technology",
issn = "1383-5866",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transformation of atrazine, carbamazepine, diclofenac and sulfamethoxazole by low and medium pressure UV and UV/H2O2 treatment

AU - Lekkerkerker-Teunissen, Karin

AU - Benotti, Mark J.

AU - Snyder, Shane A

AU - Van Dijk, Hans C.

PY - 2012/8/21

Y1 - 2012/8/21

N2 - Differences in the degradation and transformation of atrazine (ATZ), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in deionized water during UV and UV/H2O2 treatment using lowpressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) UV lamps, were assessed using a collimated beam apparatus. UV doses ranged from 300700 mJ/cm2 and H2O2 doses ranged from 010 mg/L. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to measure concentrations of the parent compounds and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QToF-MS) was used to screen for transformation products following treatment. In general, there was little difference in compound degradation and transformation between LP and MP UV lamps in both UV and UV/H2O2 treatments. Removal of ATZ, SMX and DCF was largely attributed to direct photodegradation whereas CBZ was not appreciably removed by UV or UV/H2O2 treatment. All four compounds yielded transformation products following UV or UV/H2O2 treatment with LP and MP lamps. Transformation pathways were determined using accurate mass estimation to determine elemental composition, and relative abundance was determined using ion counts. For ATZ and CBZ, the transformation pathway was non-sequential, whereas for DCF and SMX, the transformation pathway was sequential. The approach outlined in this paper can be used to assess unknown transformation products formed during oxidation of organic micropollutants during water treatment.

AB - Differences in the degradation and transformation of atrazine (ATZ), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in deionized water during UV and UV/H2O2 treatment using lowpressure (LP) and medium pressure (MP) UV lamps, were assessed using a collimated beam apparatus. UV doses ranged from 300700 mJ/cm2 and H2O2 doses ranged from 010 mg/L. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to measure concentrations of the parent compounds and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QToF-MS) was used to screen for transformation products following treatment. In general, there was little difference in compound degradation and transformation between LP and MP UV lamps in both UV and UV/H2O2 treatments. Removal of ATZ, SMX and DCF was largely attributed to direct photodegradation whereas CBZ was not appreciably removed by UV or UV/H2O2 treatment. All four compounds yielded transformation products following UV or UV/H2O2 treatment with LP and MP lamps. Transformation pathways were determined using accurate mass estimation to determine elemental composition, and relative abundance was determined using ion counts. For ATZ and CBZ, the transformation pathway was non-sequential, whereas for DCF and SMX, the transformation pathway was sequential. The approach outlined in this paper can be used to assess unknown transformation products formed during oxidation of organic micropollutants during water treatment.

KW - Advanced oxidation

KW - By-product formation

KW - Degradation pathway

KW - Intensity counts

KW - Organic micropollutants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027931172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027931172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.05.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027931172

VL - 96

SP - 33

EP - 43

JO - Separation and Purification Technology

JF - Separation and Purification Technology

SN - 1383-5866

ER -