Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era: Metadata and Standards

Liam J. Caffery, David Clunie, Clara N Curiel, Josep Malvehy, H. Peter Soyer, Allan C. Halpern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Imaging is increasingly being used in dermatology for documentation, diagnosis, and management of cutaneous disease. The lack of standards for dermatologic imaging is an impediment to clinical uptake. Standardization can occur in image acquisition, terminology, interoperability, and metadata. This paper presents the International Skin Imaging Collaboration position on standardization of metadata for dermatologic imaging. Metadata is essential to ensure that dermatologic images are properly managed and interpreted. There are two standards-based approaches to recording and storing metadata in dermatologic imaging. The first uses standard consumer image file formats, and the second is the file format and metadata model developed for the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard. DICOM would appear to provide an advantage over using consumer image file formats for metadata as it includes all the patient, study, and technical metadata necessary to use images clinically. Whereas, consumer image file formats only include technical metadata and need to be used in conjunction with another actor—for example, an electronic medical record—to supply the patient and study metadata. The use of DICOM may have some ancillary benefits in dermatologic imaging including leveraging DICOM network and workflow services, interoperability of images and metadata, leveraging existing enterprise imaging infrastructure, greater patient safety, and better compliance to legislative requirements for image retention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 17 2018

Fingerprint

Metadata
Imaging techniques
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)
Communication
Medicine
Interoperability
Standardization
Medical Electronics
Dermatology
Biomedical equipment
Workflow
Image acquisition
Patient Safety
Terminology
Skin Diseases
Documentation
Skin

Keywords

  • Dermatology
  • DICOM
  • Enterprise imaging
  • Metadata
  • Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era : Metadata and Standards. / Caffery, Liam J.; Clunie, David; Curiel, Clara N; Malvehy, Josep; Soyer, H. Peter; Halpern, Allan C.

In: Journal of Digital Imaging, 17.01.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caffery, Liam J. ; Clunie, David ; Curiel, Clara N ; Malvehy, Josep ; Soyer, H. Peter ; Halpern, Allan C. / Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era : Metadata and Standards. In: Journal of Digital Imaging. 2018 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{ecd1dae451d948789d601d4dcac59fa3,
title = "Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era: Metadata and Standards",
abstract = "Imaging is increasingly being used in dermatology for documentation, diagnosis, and management of cutaneous disease. The lack of standards for dermatologic imaging is an impediment to clinical uptake. Standardization can occur in image acquisition, terminology, interoperability, and metadata. This paper presents the International Skin Imaging Collaboration position on standardization of metadata for dermatologic imaging. Metadata is essential to ensure that dermatologic images are properly managed and interpreted. There are two standards-based approaches to recording and storing metadata in dermatologic imaging. The first uses standard consumer image file formats, and the second is the file format and metadata model developed for the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard. DICOM would appear to provide an advantage over using consumer image file formats for metadata as it includes all the patient, study, and technical metadata necessary to use images clinically. Whereas, consumer image file formats only include technical metadata and need to be used in conjunction with another actor—for example, an electronic medical record—to supply the patient and study metadata. The use of DICOM may have some ancillary benefits in dermatologic imaging including leveraging DICOM network and workflow services, interoperability of images and metadata, leveraging existing enterprise imaging infrastructure, greater patient safety, and better compliance to legislative requirements for image retention.",
keywords = "Dermatology, DICOM, Enterprise imaging, Metadata, Standards",
author = "Caffery, {Liam J.} and David Clunie and Curiel, {Clara N} and Josep Malvehy and Soyer, {H. Peter} and Halpern, {Allan C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s10278-017-0045-8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",
issn = "0897-1889",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transforming Dermatologic Imaging for the Digital Era

T2 - Metadata and Standards

AU - Caffery, Liam J.

AU - Clunie, David

AU - Curiel, Clara N

AU - Malvehy, Josep

AU - Soyer, H. Peter

AU - Halpern, Allan C.

PY - 2018/1/17

Y1 - 2018/1/17

N2 - Imaging is increasingly being used in dermatology for documentation, diagnosis, and management of cutaneous disease. The lack of standards for dermatologic imaging is an impediment to clinical uptake. Standardization can occur in image acquisition, terminology, interoperability, and metadata. This paper presents the International Skin Imaging Collaboration position on standardization of metadata for dermatologic imaging. Metadata is essential to ensure that dermatologic images are properly managed and interpreted. There are two standards-based approaches to recording and storing metadata in dermatologic imaging. The first uses standard consumer image file formats, and the second is the file format and metadata model developed for the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard. DICOM would appear to provide an advantage over using consumer image file formats for metadata as it includes all the patient, study, and technical metadata necessary to use images clinically. Whereas, consumer image file formats only include technical metadata and need to be used in conjunction with another actor—for example, an electronic medical record—to supply the patient and study metadata. The use of DICOM may have some ancillary benefits in dermatologic imaging including leveraging DICOM network and workflow services, interoperability of images and metadata, leveraging existing enterprise imaging infrastructure, greater patient safety, and better compliance to legislative requirements for image retention.

AB - Imaging is increasingly being used in dermatology for documentation, diagnosis, and management of cutaneous disease. The lack of standards for dermatologic imaging is an impediment to clinical uptake. Standardization can occur in image acquisition, terminology, interoperability, and metadata. This paper presents the International Skin Imaging Collaboration position on standardization of metadata for dermatologic imaging. Metadata is essential to ensure that dermatologic images are properly managed and interpreted. There are two standards-based approaches to recording and storing metadata in dermatologic imaging. The first uses standard consumer image file formats, and the second is the file format and metadata model developed for the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard. DICOM would appear to provide an advantage over using consumer image file formats for metadata as it includes all the patient, study, and technical metadata necessary to use images clinically. Whereas, consumer image file formats only include technical metadata and need to be used in conjunction with another actor—for example, an electronic medical record—to supply the patient and study metadata. The use of DICOM may have some ancillary benefits in dermatologic imaging including leveraging DICOM network and workflow services, interoperability of images and metadata, leveraging existing enterprise imaging infrastructure, greater patient safety, and better compliance to legislative requirements for image retention.

KW - Dermatology

KW - DICOM

KW - Enterprise imaging

KW - Metadata

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040683464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040683464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10278-017-0045-8

DO - 10.1007/s10278-017-0045-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 29344752

AN - SCOPUS:85040683464

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

SN - 0897-1889

ER -