Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations

Evert Gummesson, Robert F Lusch, Stephen L. Vargo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on actions and obstacles in the conceptual transition from mainstream service management (19702000s) to a new approach synthesized in servicedominant (SD) logic (2000s). Design/methodology/approach – The paper takes the form of a review of approaches to service in the literature, education, and practice in management disciplines and economics. Findings – SD logic has triggered considerable interest in the global academic community. Its ten foundational premises (FPs) hold that service(s) and the roles of suppliers/customers be reconceptualized on a higher level of relevance and generalization. The new logic is not final but – to use its own terminology – is a value proposition that opens up for cocreated theory improvements. Research limitations/implications – To transition from a goods/services divide to a goods/service union, the platform for future service research requires the superordination of mainstream service management by a new language and lexicon and the generation of new theory; testing of the new theory by comparing its robustness with that of extant theory; conduct of empirical studies through hypothesestesting and real world, indepth research and the application of complexity theory, network, and systems theory; cocreation by and between researchers; focus on validity and relevance by using the full range of SD logic compatible methods and metrics; and investigation at both micro and macro levels. Practical implications – Business, marketing, governments, and politicians should focus on service and value and abandon the goods/services and producer/customer divides. Textbooks and educators should transition from outdated concepts and models. Improved education is strongly supported by IBM's service science programme. Originality/value – The paper suggests that several developments in mainstream service management that once brought attention to service now provide obstacles both in research, education, and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-22
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Quality and Service Sciences
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 23 2010

Fingerprint

Service management
Service-dominant logic
Logic
Education
Testing
Robustness
Value proposition
Complexity theory
Politicians
Network theory
Systems theory
Suppliers
Economics
Empirical study
Government
Co-creation
Service science
Business marketing
Language
Design methodology

Keywords

  • Complexity theory
  • Customer service management
  • Education
  • Systems theory
  • Transition management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic : Observations and recommendations. / Gummesson, Evert; Lusch, Robert F; Vargo, Stephen L.

In: International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 1, 23.03.2010, p. 8-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb6587ad64444f409d14b787a5d3c637,
title = "Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic: Observations and recommendations",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on actions and obstacles in the conceptual transition from mainstream service management (19702000s) to a new approach synthesized in servicedominant (SD) logic (2000s). Design/methodology/approach – The paper takes the form of a review of approaches to service in the literature, education, and practice in management disciplines and economics. Findings – SD logic has triggered considerable interest in the global academic community. Its ten foundational premises (FPs) hold that service(s) and the roles of suppliers/customers be reconceptualized on a higher level of relevance and generalization. The new logic is not final but – to use its own terminology – is a value proposition that opens up for cocreated theory improvements. Research limitations/implications – To transition from a goods/services divide to a goods/service union, the platform for future service research requires the superordination of mainstream service management by a new language and lexicon and the generation of new theory; testing of the new theory by comparing its robustness with that of extant theory; conduct of empirical studies through hypothesestesting and real world, indepth research and the application of complexity theory, network, and systems theory; cocreation by and between researchers; focus on validity and relevance by using the full range of SD logic compatible methods and metrics; and investigation at both micro and macro levels. Practical implications – Business, marketing, governments, and politicians should focus on service and value and abandon the goods/services and producer/customer divides. Textbooks and educators should transition from outdated concepts and models. Improved education is strongly supported by IBM's service science programme. Originality/value – The paper suggests that several developments in mainstream service management that once brought attention to service now provide obstacles both in research, education, and practice.",
keywords = "Complexity theory, Customer service management, Education, Systems theory, Transition management",
author = "Evert Gummesson and Lusch, {Robert F} and Vargo, {Stephen L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1108/17566691011026577",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "8--22",
journal = "International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences",
issn = "1756-669X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transitioning from service management to service-dominant logic

T2 - Observations and recommendations

AU - Gummesson, Evert

AU - Lusch, Robert F

AU - Vargo, Stephen L.

PY - 2010/3/23

Y1 - 2010/3/23

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on actions and obstacles in the conceptual transition from mainstream service management (19702000s) to a new approach synthesized in servicedominant (SD) logic (2000s). Design/methodology/approach – The paper takes the form of a review of approaches to service in the literature, education, and practice in management disciplines and economics. Findings – SD logic has triggered considerable interest in the global academic community. Its ten foundational premises (FPs) hold that service(s) and the roles of suppliers/customers be reconceptualized on a higher level of relevance and generalization. The new logic is not final but – to use its own terminology – is a value proposition that opens up for cocreated theory improvements. Research limitations/implications – To transition from a goods/services divide to a goods/service union, the platform for future service research requires the superordination of mainstream service management by a new language and lexicon and the generation of new theory; testing of the new theory by comparing its robustness with that of extant theory; conduct of empirical studies through hypothesestesting and real world, indepth research and the application of complexity theory, network, and systems theory; cocreation by and between researchers; focus on validity and relevance by using the full range of SD logic compatible methods and metrics; and investigation at both micro and macro levels. Practical implications – Business, marketing, governments, and politicians should focus on service and value and abandon the goods/services and producer/customer divides. Textbooks and educators should transition from outdated concepts and models. Improved education is strongly supported by IBM's service science programme. Originality/value – The paper suggests that several developments in mainstream service management that once brought attention to service now provide obstacles both in research, education, and practice.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on actions and obstacles in the conceptual transition from mainstream service management (19702000s) to a new approach synthesized in servicedominant (SD) logic (2000s). Design/methodology/approach – The paper takes the form of a review of approaches to service in the literature, education, and practice in management disciplines and economics. Findings – SD logic has triggered considerable interest in the global academic community. Its ten foundational premises (FPs) hold that service(s) and the roles of suppliers/customers be reconceptualized on a higher level of relevance and generalization. The new logic is not final but – to use its own terminology – is a value proposition that opens up for cocreated theory improvements. Research limitations/implications – To transition from a goods/services divide to a goods/service union, the platform for future service research requires the superordination of mainstream service management by a new language and lexicon and the generation of new theory; testing of the new theory by comparing its robustness with that of extant theory; conduct of empirical studies through hypothesestesting and real world, indepth research and the application of complexity theory, network, and systems theory; cocreation by and between researchers; focus on validity and relevance by using the full range of SD logic compatible methods and metrics; and investigation at both micro and macro levels. Practical implications – Business, marketing, governments, and politicians should focus on service and value and abandon the goods/services and producer/customer divides. Textbooks and educators should transition from outdated concepts and models. Improved education is strongly supported by IBM's service science programme. Originality/value – The paper suggests that several developments in mainstream service management that once brought attention to service now provide obstacles both in research, education, and practice.

KW - Complexity theory

KW - Customer service management

KW - Education

KW - Systems theory

KW - Transition management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986165679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986165679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/17566691011026577

DO - 10.1108/17566691011026577

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986165679

VL - 2

SP - 8

EP - 22

JO - International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences

JF - International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences

SN - 1756-669X

IS - 1

ER -