Translational research in aphasia

From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation

Anastasia M. Raymer, Pelagie M Beeson, Audrey Holland, Diane Kendall, Lynn M. Maher, Nadine Martin, Laura Murray, Miranda Rose, Cynthia K. Thompson, Lyn Turkstra, Lori Altmann, Mary Boyle, Tim Conway, William Hula, Kevin Kearns, Brenda Rapp, Nina Simmons-Mackie, Leslie J. Gonzalez Rothi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In this article, the authors encapsulate discussions of the Language Work Group that took place as part of the Workshop in Plasticity/NeuroRehabilitation Research at the University of Florida in April 2005. Method: In this narrative review, they define neuroplasticity and review studies that demonstrate neural changes associated with aphasia recovery and treatment. The authors then summarize basic science evidence from animals, human cognition, and computational neuroscience that is relevant to aphasia treatment research. They then turn to the aphasia treatment literature in which evidence exists to support several of the neuroscience principles. Conclusion: Despite the extant aphasia treatment literature, many questions remain regarding how neuroscience principles can be manipulated to maximize aphasia recovery and treatment. They propose a framework, incorporating some of these principles, that may serve as a potential roadmap for future investigations of aphasia treatment and recovery. In addition to translational investigations from basic to clinical science, the authors propose several areas in which translation can occur from clinical to basic science to contribute to the fundamental knowledge base of neurorehabilitation. This article is intended to reinvigorate interest in delineating the factors influencing successful recovery from aphasia through basic, translational, and clinical research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

Fingerprint

Translational Medical Research
Aphasia
speech disorder
Neurosciences
neurosciences
Therapeutics
science
Neuronal Plasticity
Knowledge Bases
group work
Neurological Rehabilitation
Neuroscience
Translational Research
Neurorehabilitation
Research
Cognition
evidence
cognition
Language
animal

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • Plasticity
  • Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Translational research in aphasia : From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. / Raymer, Anastasia M.; Beeson, Pelagie M; Holland, Audrey; Kendall, Diane; Maher, Lynn M.; Martin, Nadine; Murray, Laura; Rose, Miranda; Thompson, Cynthia K.; Turkstra, Lyn; Altmann, Lori; Boyle, Mary; Conway, Tim; Hula, William; Kearns, Kevin; Rapp, Brenda; Simmons-Mackie, Nina; Gonzalez Rothi, Leslie J.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 51, No. 1, 01.02.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raymer, AM, Beeson, PM, Holland, A, Kendall, D, Maher, LM, Martin, N, Murray, L, Rose, M, Thompson, CK, Turkstra, L, Altmann, L, Boyle, M, Conway, T, Hula, W, Kearns, K, Rapp, B, Simmons-Mackie, N & Gonzalez Rothi, LJ 2008, 'Translational research in aphasia: From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation', Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 51, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/020)
Raymer, Anastasia M. ; Beeson, Pelagie M ; Holland, Audrey ; Kendall, Diane ; Maher, Lynn M. ; Martin, Nadine ; Murray, Laura ; Rose, Miranda ; Thompson, Cynthia K. ; Turkstra, Lyn ; Altmann, Lori ; Boyle, Mary ; Conway, Tim ; Hula, William ; Kearns, Kevin ; Rapp, Brenda ; Simmons-Mackie, Nina ; Gonzalez Rothi, Leslie J. / Translational research in aphasia : From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2008 ; Vol. 51, No. 1.
@article{f2b28303bf634a499a19b2e8d75765c9,
title = "Translational research in aphasia: From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation",
abstract = "Purpose: In this article, the authors encapsulate discussions of the Language Work Group that took place as part of the Workshop in Plasticity/NeuroRehabilitation Research at the University of Florida in April 2005. Method: In this narrative review, they define neuroplasticity and review studies that demonstrate neural changes associated with aphasia recovery and treatment. The authors then summarize basic science evidence from animals, human cognition, and computational neuroscience that is relevant to aphasia treatment research. They then turn to the aphasia treatment literature in which evidence exists to support several of the neuroscience principles. Conclusion: Despite the extant aphasia treatment literature, many questions remain regarding how neuroscience principles can be manipulated to maximize aphasia recovery and treatment. They propose a framework, incorporating some of these principles, that may serve as a potential roadmap for future investigations of aphasia treatment and recovery. In addition to translational investigations from basic to clinical science, the authors propose several areas in which translation can occur from clinical to basic science to contribute to the fundamental knowledge base of neurorehabilitation. This article is intended to reinvigorate interest in delineating the factors influencing successful recovery from aphasia through basic, translational, and clinical research.",
keywords = "Aphasia, Plasticity, Rehabilitation",
author = "Raymer, {Anastasia M.} and Beeson, {Pelagie M} and Audrey Holland and Diane Kendall and Maher, {Lynn M.} and Nadine Martin and Laura Murray and Miranda Rose and Thompson, {Cynthia K.} and Lyn Turkstra and Lori Altmann and Mary Boyle and Tim Conway and William Hula and Kevin Kearns and Brenda Rapp and Nina Simmons-Mackie and {Gonzalez Rothi}, {Leslie J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/1092-4388(2008/020)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translational research in aphasia

T2 - From neuroscience to neurorehabilitation

AU - Raymer, Anastasia M.

AU - Beeson, Pelagie M

AU - Holland, Audrey

AU - Kendall, Diane

AU - Maher, Lynn M.

AU - Martin, Nadine

AU - Murray, Laura

AU - Rose, Miranda

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K.

AU - Turkstra, Lyn

AU - Altmann, Lori

AU - Boyle, Mary

AU - Conway, Tim

AU - Hula, William

AU - Kearns, Kevin

AU - Rapp, Brenda

AU - Simmons-Mackie, Nina

AU - Gonzalez Rothi, Leslie J.

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - Purpose: In this article, the authors encapsulate discussions of the Language Work Group that took place as part of the Workshop in Plasticity/NeuroRehabilitation Research at the University of Florida in April 2005. Method: In this narrative review, they define neuroplasticity and review studies that demonstrate neural changes associated with aphasia recovery and treatment. The authors then summarize basic science evidence from animals, human cognition, and computational neuroscience that is relevant to aphasia treatment research. They then turn to the aphasia treatment literature in which evidence exists to support several of the neuroscience principles. Conclusion: Despite the extant aphasia treatment literature, many questions remain regarding how neuroscience principles can be manipulated to maximize aphasia recovery and treatment. They propose a framework, incorporating some of these principles, that may serve as a potential roadmap for future investigations of aphasia treatment and recovery. In addition to translational investigations from basic to clinical science, the authors propose several areas in which translation can occur from clinical to basic science to contribute to the fundamental knowledge base of neurorehabilitation. This article is intended to reinvigorate interest in delineating the factors influencing successful recovery from aphasia through basic, translational, and clinical research.

AB - Purpose: In this article, the authors encapsulate discussions of the Language Work Group that took place as part of the Workshop in Plasticity/NeuroRehabilitation Research at the University of Florida in April 2005. Method: In this narrative review, they define neuroplasticity and review studies that demonstrate neural changes associated with aphasia recovery and treatment. The authors then summarize basic science evidence from animals, human cognition, and computational neuroscience that is relevant to aphasia treatment research. They then turn to the aphasia treatment literature in which evidence exists to support several of the neuroscience principles. Conclusion: Despite the extant aphasia treatment literature, many questions remain regarding how neuroscience principles can be manipulated to maximize aphasia recovery and treatment. They propose a framework, incorporating some of these principles, that may serve as a potential roadmap for future investigations of aphasia treatment and recovery. In addition to translational investigations from basic to clinical science, the authors propose several areas in which translation can occur from clinical to basic science to contribute to the fundamental knowledge base of neurorehabilitation. This article is intended to reinvigorate interest in delineating the factors influencing successful recovery from aphasia through basic, translational, and clinical research.

KW - Aphasia

KW - Plasticity

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849103863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849103863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/020)

DO - 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/020)

M3 - Article

VL - 51

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 1

ER -