Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system: Is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept?

Demetrios Demetriades, Brian Kimbrell, Ali Salim, George Velmahos, Peter M Rhee, Christy Preston, Ginger Gruzinski, Linda Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

142 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trimodal distribution of trauma deaths, described more than 20 years ago, is still widely taught in the design of trauma systems. The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability of this trimodal distribution in a modern trauma system. STUDY DESIGN: A study of trauma registry and emergency medical services records of trauma deaths in the County of Los Angeles was conducted over a 3-year period. The times from injury to death were analyzed according to mechanism of injury and body area (head, chest, abdomen, extremities) with severe trauma (abbreviated injury score [AIS] < 4). RESULTS: During the study period there were 4,151 trauma deaths. Penetrating trauma accounted for 50.0% of these deaths. The most commonly injured body area with critical trauma (AIS < 4) was the head (32.0%), followed by chest (20.8%), abdomen (11.5%), and extremities (1.8%). Time from injury to death was available in 2,944 of these trauma deaths. Overall, there were two distinct peaks of deaths: the first peak (50.2% of deaths) occurred within the first hour of injury. The second peak occurred 1 to 6 hours after admission (18.3% of deaths). Only 7.6% of deaths were late (>1 week), during the third peak of the classic trimodal distribution. Temporal distribution of deaths in penetrating trauma was very different from blunt trauma and did not follow the classic trimodal distribution. Other significant independent factors associated with time of death were chest AIS and head AIS. Temporal distribution of deaths as a result of severe head trauma did not follow any pattern and did not resemble classic trimodal distribution at all. CONCLUSIONS: The classic "trimodal" distribution of deaths does not apply in our trauma system. Temporal distribution of deaths is influenced by the mechanism of injury, age of the patient, and body area with severe trauma. Knowledge of the time of distribution of deaths might help in allocating trauma resources and focusing research effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-348
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume201
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Craniocerebral Trauma
Thoracic Injuries
Los Angeles
Emergency Medical Services
Abdomen
Medical Records
Registries
Thorax
Extremities
Head
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system : Is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept? / Demetriades, Demetrios; Kimbrell, Brian; Salim, Ali; Velmahos, George; Rhee, Peter M; Preston, Christy; Gruzinski, Ginger; Chan, Linda.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 201, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 343-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Demetriades, D, Kimbrell, B, Salim, A, Velmahos, G, Rhee, PM, Preston, C, Gruzinski, G & Chan, L 2005, 'Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system: Is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept?', Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 201, no. 3, pp. 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.003
Demetriades, Demetrios ; Kimbrell, Brian ; Salim, Ali ; Velmahos, George ; Rhee, Peter M ; Preston, Christy ; Gruzinski, Ginger ; Chan, Linda. / Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system : Is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept?. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2005 ; Vol. 201, No. 3. pp. 343-348.
@article{aafe07354b1c4da8bc657ea4a3636c51,
title = "Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system: Is {"}trimodal{"} distribution a valid concept?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Trimodal distribution of trauma deaths, described more than 20 years ago, is still widely taught in the design of trauma systems. The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability of this trimodal distribution in a modern trauma system. STUDY DESIGN: A study of trauma registry and emergency medical services records of trauma deaths in the County of Los Angeles was conducted over a 3-year period. The times from injury to death were analyzed according to mechanism of injury and body area (head, chest, abdomen, extremities) with severe trauma (abbreviated injury score [AIS] < 4). RESULTS: During the study period there were 4,151 trauma deaths. Penetrating trauma accounted for 50.0{\%} of these deaths. The most commonly injured body area with critical trauma (AIS < 4) was the head (32.0{\%}), followed by chest (20.8{\%}), abdomen (11.5{\%}), and extremities (1.8{\%}). Time from injury to death was available in 2,944 of these trauma deaths. Overall, there were two distinct peaks of deaths: the first peak (50.2{\%} of deaths) occurred within the first hour of injury. The second peak occurred 1 to 6 hours after admission (18.3{\%} of deaths). Only 7.6{\%} of deaths were late (>1 week), during the third peak of the classic trimodal distribution. Temporal distribution of deaths in penetrating trauma was very different from blunt trauma and did not follow the classic trimodal distribution. Other significant independent factors associated with time of death were chest AIS and head AIS. Temporal distribution of deaths as a result of severe head trauma did not follow any pattern and did not resemble classic trimodal distribution at all. CONCLUSIONS: The classic {"}trimodal{"} distribution of deaths does not apply in our trauma system. Temporal distribution of deaths is influenced by the mechanism of injury, age of the patient, and body area with severe trauma. Knowledge of the time of distribution of deaths might help in allocating trauma resources and focusing research effort.",
author = "Demetrios Demetriades and Brian Kimbrell and Ali Salim and George Velmahos and Rhee, {Peter M} and Christy Preston and Ginger Gruzinski and Linda Chan",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "201",
pages = "343--348",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trauma deaths in a mature urban trauma system

T2 - Is "trimodal" distribution a valid concept?

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

AU - Kimbrell, Brian

AU - Salim, Ali

AU - Velmahos, George

AU - Rhee, Peter M

AU - Preston, Christy

AU - Gruzinski, Ginger

AU - Chan, Linda

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Trimodal distribution of trauma deaths, described more than 20 years ago, is still widely taught in the design of trauma systems. The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability of this trimodal distribution in a modern trauma system. STUDY DESIGN: A study of trauma registry and emergency medical services records of trauma deaths in the County of Los Angeles was conducted over a 3-year period. The times from injury to death were analyzed according to mechanism of injury and body area (head, chest, abdomen, extremities) with severe trauma (abbreviated injury score [AIS] < 4). RESULTS: During the study period there were 4,151 trauma deaths. Penetrating trauma accounted for 50.0% of these deaths. The most commonly injured body area with critical trauma (AIS < 4) was the head (32.0%), followed by chest (20.8%), abdomen (11.5%), and extremities (1.8%). Time from injury to death was available in 2,944 of these trauma deaths. Overall, there were two distinct peaks of deaths: the first peak (50.2% of deaths) occurred within the first hour of injury. The second peak occurred 1 to 6 hours after admission (18.3% of deaths). Only 7.6% of deaths were late (>1 week), during the third peak of the classic trimodal distribution. Temporal distribution of deaths in penetrating trauma was very different from blunt trauma and did not follow the classic trimodal distribution. Other significant independent factors associated with time of death were chest AIS and head AIS. Temporal distribution of deaths as a result of severe head trauma did not follow any pattern and did not resemble classic trimodal distribution at all. CONCLUSIONS: The classic "trimodal" distribution of deaths does not apply in our trauma system. Temporal distribution of deaths is influenced by the mechanism of injury, age of the patient, and body area with severe trauma. Knowledge of the time of distribution of deaths might help in allocating trauma resources and focusing research effort.

AB - BACKGROUND: Trimodal distribution of trauma deaths, described more than 20 years ago, is still widely taught in the design of trauma systems. The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability of this trimodal distribution in a modern trauma system. STUDY DESIGN: A study of trauma registry and emergency medical services records of trauma deaths in the County of Los Angeles was conducted over a 3-year period. The times from injury to death were analyzed according to mechanism of injury and body area (head, chest, abdomen, extremities) with severe trauma (abbreviated injury score [AIS] < 4). RESULTS: During the study period there were 4,151 trauma deaths. Penetrating trauma accounted for 50.0% of these deaths. The most commonly injured body area with critical trauma (AIS < 4) was the head (32.0%), followed by chest (20.8%), abdomen (11.5%), and extremities (1.8%). Time from injury to death was available in 2,944 of these trauma deaths. Overall, there were two distinct peaks of deaths: the first peak (50.2% of deaths) occurred within the first hour of injury. The second peak occurred 1 to 6 hours after admission (18.3% of deaths). Only 7.6% of deaths were late (>1 week), during the third peak of the classic trimodal distribution. Temporal distribution of deaths in penetrating trauma was very different from blunt trauma and did not follow the classic trimodal distribution. Other significant independent factors associated with time of death were chest AIS and head AIS. Temporal distribution of deaths as a result of severe head trauma did not follow any pattern and did not resemble classic trimodal distribution at all. CONCLUSIONS: The classic "trimodal" distribution of deaths does not apply in our trauma system. Temporal distribution of deaths is influenced by the mechanism of injury, age of the patient, and body area with severe trauma. Knowledge of the time of distribution of deaths might help in allocating trauma resources and focusing research effort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23944458586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23944458586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 16125066

AN - SCOPUS:23944458586

VL - 201

SP - 343

EP - 348

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 3

ER -