Tropes and truth

Keith Lehrer, Joseph T Tolliver

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The advantages of trope theory for metaphysics and ontology have been brilliantly articulated by Kevin Mulligan. Rejecting the existence of properties, following a tradition of Hume and Reid, leads to parsimony. We wish to add a caveat. Using tropes referentially to refer to a plurality of individuals by exhibiting what they are like has an epistemological advantage for securing truth. When the individual trope is used as an exemplar or sample to represent a plurality of objects directly, then, it refers to itself as an exhibit of the individuals in the plurality. The exemplar used in this way, in exemplar representation, represents and is true of itself as one of the individuals it represents in a reflexive loop. The direct reflexive representation is a secure truth loop. We argue that the security of the truth connection is lost if properties or even predicates are brought into the connection. Tropes used in exemplar representation can provide the secure truth connection only if properties do not function in a mode of presentation of the facts that sensory particulars represent. Goodman is a source of the notion of exemplar representation, which he called exemplification, but he brought in properties as what was exemplified, and lost, thereby, the security of the self-representational truth loop of the exemplar reflexively back onto itself. Using the exemplar itself as directly referential as a mode of presentation of facts about itself without connecting it with properties or predicates, what Lehrer has called exemplarization, is required to secure a truth connection between representation and experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages109-116
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9783319041995, 9783319041988
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Tropes
Plurality
Mode of Presentation
Epistemological
Metaphysics
Wishes
Parsimony
Ontology
Exemplification
Referential

Keywords

  • Exemplarization
  • Properties
  • Self-knowledge
  • Tropes
  • Truth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Lehrer, K., & Tolliver, J. T. (2014). Tropes and truth. In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1 (pp. 109-116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_8

Tropes and truth. / Lehrer, Keith; Tolliver, Joseph T.

Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1. Springer International Publishing, 2014. p. 109-116.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lehrer, K & Tolliver, JT 2014, Tropes and truth. in Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1. Springer International Publishing, pp. 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_8
Lehrer K, Tolliver JT. Tropes and truth. In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1. Springer International Publishing. 2014. p. 109-116 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_8
Lehrer, Keith ; Tolliver, Joseph T. / Tropes and truth. Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1. Springer International Publishing, 2014. pp. 109-116
@inbook{0336683b5b99483da850d0696a8da4fa,
title = "Tropes and truth",
abstract = "The advantages of trope theory for metaphysics and ontology have been brilliantly articulated by Kevin Mulligan. Rejecting the existence of properties, following a tradition of Hume and Reid, leads to parsimony. We wish to add a caveat. Using tropes referentially to refer to a plurality of individuals by exhibiting what they are like has an epistemological advantage for securing truth. When the individual trope is used as an exemplar or sample to represent a plurality of objects directly, then, it refers to itself as an exhibit of the individuals in the plurality. The exemplar used in this way, in exemplar representation, represents and is true of itself as one of the individuals it represents in a reflexive loop. The direct reflexive representation is a secure truth loop. We argue that the security of the truth connection is lost if properties or even predicates are brought into the connection. Tropes used in exemplar representation can provide the secure truth connection only if properties do not function in a mode of presentation of the facts that sensory particulars represent. Goodman is a source of the notion of exemplar representation, which he called exemplification, but he brought in properties as what was exemplified, and lost, thereby, the security of the self-representational truth loop of the exemplar reflexively back onto itself. Using the exemplar itself as directly referential as a mode of presentation of facts about itself without connecting it with properties or predicates, what Lehrer has called exemplarization, is required to secure a truth connection between representation and experience.",
keywords = "Exemplarization, Properties, Self-knowledge, Tropes, Truth",
author = "Keith Lehrer and Tolliver, {Joseph T}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_8",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319041995",
pages = "109--116",
booktitle = "Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Tropes and truth

AU - Lehrer, Keith

AU - Tolliver, Joseph T

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The advantages of trope theory for metaphysics and ontology have been brilliantly articulated by Kevin Mulligan. Rejecting the existence of properties, following a tradition of Hume and Reid, leads to parsimony. We wish to add a caveat. Using tropes referentially to refer to a plurality of individuals by exhibiting what they are like has an epistemological advantage for securing truth. When the individual trope is used as an exemplar or sample to represent a plurality of objects directly, then, it refers to itself as an exhibit of the individuals in the plurality. The exemplar used in this way, in exemplar representation, represents and is true of itself as one of the individuals it represents in a reflexive loop. The direct reflexive representation is a secure truth loop. We argue that the security of the truth connection is lost if properties or even predicates are brought into the connection. Tropes used in exemplar representation can provide the secure truth connection only if properties do not function in a mode of presentation of the facts that sensory particulars represent. Goodman is a source of the notion of exemplar representation, which he called exemplification, but he brought in properties as what was exemplified, and lost, thereby, the security of the self-representational truth loop of the exemplar reflexively back onto itself. Using the exemplar itself as directly referential as a mode of presentation of facts about itself without connecting it with properties or predicates, what Lehrer has called exemplarization, is required to secure a truth connection between representation and experience.

AB - The advantages of trope theory for metaphysics and ontology have been brilliantly articulated by Kevin Mulligan. Rejecting the existence of properties, following a tradition of Hume and Reid, leads to parsimony. We wish to add a caveat. Using tropes referentially to refer to a plurality of individuals by exhibiting what they are like has an epistemological advantage for securing truth. When the individual trope is used as an exemplar or sample to represent a plurality of objects directly, then, it refers to itself as an exhibit of the individuals in the plurality. The exemplar used in this way, in exemplar representation, represents and is true of itself as one of the individuals it represents in a reflexive loop. The direct reflexive representation is a secure truth loop. We argue that the security of the truth connection is lost if properties or even predicates are brought into the connection. Tropes used in exemplar representation can provide the secure truth connection only if properties do not function in a mode of presentation of the facts that sensory particulars represent. Goodman is a source of the notion of exemplar representation, which he called exemplification, but he brought in properties as what was exemplified, and lost, thereby, the security of the self-representational truth loop of the exemplar reflexively back onto itself. Using the exemplar itself as directly referential as a mode of presentation of facts about itself without connecting it with properties or predicates, what Lehrer has called exemplarization, is required to secure a truth connection between representation and experience.

KW - Exemplarization

KW - Properties

KW - Self-knowledge

KW - Tropes

KW - Truth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948133317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948133317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-04199-5_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319041995

SN - 9783319041988

SP - 109

EP - 116

BT - Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan-Volume 1

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -