Trophic rank and the species-area relationship

Robert D. Holt, John H. Lawton, Gary A. Polis, Neo D Martinez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

315 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The species-area relationship may be the strongest empirical generalization in community ecology. We explore the effect of trophic rank upon the 'strength' of the species-area relationship, as measured by z, the slope of a log(species) vs. log(area) plot. We present a simple model for communities closed to immigration, composed of 'stacked specialist' food chains (where each plant species supports a specialist herbivore, which in turn sustains a specialist carnivore, etc.), that predicts z should increase with trophic rank; the model brings out some of the spatial implications of sequential dependencies among species. We discuss empirical examples in which the z values of taxa differing in trophic rank were reported and lament the shortage of well-documented examples in the ecological literature. Several examples fit the expected pattern, but others do not. We outline several additional reasons why z values might increase with trophic rank, even for generalists. If the qualitative assumptions of the model are relaxed, the predicted effect of trophic rank on z should weaken or even be reversed. Trophic rank may not have a systematic effect on the species-area relationship if (1) there are strong top-down interactions leading to prey extinctions; (2) communities are open, with recurrent immigration, particularly at higher trophic ranks; (3) consumers are facultative generalists, able to exist on a wide range of resource species; or (4) systems are far from equilibrium. Our aim in this thought piece is to stimulate community ecologists to link theoretical and empirical studies of food web structure with analyses of spatial dynamics and landscape ecology, and to encourage empirical studies of the species-area relationship focused on comparisons across taxa varying in trophic rank.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1495-1504
Number of pages10
JournalEcology
Volume80
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jul 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

species-area relationship
immigration
generalist
landscape ecology
community ecology
ecologists
food chain
carnivores
food webs
herbivores
extinction
carnivore
food web
herbivore
resource
effect

Keywords

  • Distribution
  • Generalist
  • Island
  • Patch
  • Specialist
  • Specialist vs. generalist food webs
  • Species-area
  • Trophic rank and species-area relationship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Holt, R. D., Lawton, J. H., Polis, G. A., & Martinez, N. D. (1999). Trophic rank and the species-area relationship. Ecology, 80(5), 1495-1504.

Trophic rank and the species-area relationship. / Holt, Robert D.; Lawton, John H.; Polis, Gary A.; Martinez, Neo D.

In: Ecology, Vol. 80, No. 5, 07.1999, p. 1495-1504.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holt, RD, Lawton, JH, Polis, GA & Martinez, ND 1999, 'Trophic rank and the species-area relationship', Ecology, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1495-1504.
Holt RD, Lawton JH, Polis GA, Martinez ND. Trophic rank and the species-area relationship. Ecology. 1999 Jul;80(5):1495-1504.
Holt, Robert D. ; Lawton, John H. ; Polis, Gary A. ; Martinez, Neo D. / Trophic rank and the species-area relationship. In: Ecology. 1999 ; Vol. 80, No. 5. pp. 1495-1504.
@article{71af63186df54938b6390a3d2ceb35ba,
title = "Trophic rank and the species-area relationship",
abstract = "The species-area relationship may be the strongest empirical generalization in community ecology. We explore the effect of trophic rank upon the 'strength' of the species-area relationship, as measured by z, the slope of a log(species) vs. log(area) plot. We present a simple model for communities closed to immigration, composed of 'stacked specialist' food chains (where each plant species supports a specialist herbivore, which in turn sustains a specialist carnivore, etc.), that predicts z should increase with trophic rank; the model brings out some of the spatial implications of sequential dependencies among species. We discuss empirical examples in which the z values of taxa differing in trophic rank were reported and lament the shortage of well-documented examples in the ecological literature. Several examples fit the expected pattern, but others do not. We outline several additional reasons why z values might increase with trophic rank, even for generalists. If the qualitative assumptions of the model are relaxed, the predicted effect of trophic rank on z should weaken or even be reversed. Trophic rank may not have a systematic effect on the species-area relationship if (1) there are strong top-down interactions leading to prey extinctions; (2) communities are open, with recurrent immigration, particularly at higher trophic ranks; (3) consumers are facultative generalists, able to exist on a wide range of resource species; or (4) systems are far from equilibrium. Our aim in this thought piece is to stimulate community ecologists to link theoretical and empirical studies of food web structure with analyses of spatial dynamics and landscape ecology, and to encourage empirical studies of the species-area relationship focused on comparisons across taxa varying in trophic rank.",
keywords = "Distribution, Generalist, Island, Patch, Specialist, Specialist vs. generalist food webs, Species-area, Trophic rank and species-area relationship",
author = "Holt, {Robert D.} and Lawton, {John H.} and Polis, {Gary A.} and Martinez, {Neo D}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "1495--1504",
journal = "Ecology",
issn = "0012-9658",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trophic rank and the species-area relationship

AU - Holt, Robert D.

AU - Lawton, John H.

AU - Polis, Gary A.

AU - Martinez, Neo D

PY - 1999/7

Y1 - 1999/7

N2 - The species-area relationship may be the strongest empirical generalization in community ecology. We explore the effect of trophic rank upon the 'strength' of the species-area relationship, as measured by z, the slope of a log(species) vs. log(area) plot. We present a simple model for communities closed to immigration, composed of 'stacked specialist' food chains (where each plant species supports a specialist herbivore, which in turn sustains a specialist carnivore, etc.), that predicts z should increase with trophic rank; the model brings out some of the spatial implications of sequential dependencies among species. We discuss empirical examples in which the z values of taxa differing in trophic rank were reported and lament the shortage of well-documented examples in the ecological literature. Several examples fit the expected pattern, but others do not. We outline several additional reasons why z values might increase with trophic rank, even for generalists. If the qualitative assumptions of the model are relaxed, the predicted effect of trophic rank on z should weaken or even be reversed. Trophic rank may not have a systematic effect on the species-area relationship if (1) there are strong top-down interactions leading to prey extinctions; (2) communities are open, with recurrent immigration, particularly at higher trophic ranks; (3) consumers are facultative generalists, able to exist on a wide range of resource species; or (4) systems are far from equilibrium. Our aim in this thought piece is to stimulate community ecologists to link theoretical and empirical studies of food web structure with analyses of spatial dynamics and landscape ecology, and to encourage empirical studies of the species-area relationship focused on comparisons across taxa varying in trophic rank.

AB - The species-area relationship may be the strongest empirical generalization in community ecology. We explore the effect of trophic rank upon the 'strength' of the species-area relationship, as measured by z, the slope of a log(species) vs. log(area) plot. We present a simple model for communities closed to immigration, composed of 'stacked specialist' food chains (where each plant species supports a specialist herbivore, which in turn sustains a specialist carnivore, etc.), that predicts z should increase with trophic rank; the model brings out some of the spatial implications of sequential dependencies among species. We discuss empirical examples in which the z values of taxa differing in trophic rank were reported and lament the shortage of well-documented examples in the ecological literature. Several examples fit the expected pattern, but others do not. We outline several additional reasons why z values might increase with trophic rank, even for generalists. If the qualitative assumptions of the model are relaxed, the predicted effect of trophic rank on z should weaken or even be reversed. Trophic rank may not have a systematic effect on the species-area relationship if (1) there are strong top-down interactions leading to prey extinctions; (2) communities are open, with recurrent immigration, particularly at higher trophic ranks; (3) consumers are facultative generalists, able to exist on a wide range of resource species; or (4) systems are far from equilibrium. Our aim in this thought piece is to stimulate community ecologists to link theoretical and empirical studies of food web structure with analyses of spatial dynamics and landscape ecology, and to encourage empirical studies of the species-area relationship focused on comparisons across taxa varying in trophic rank.

KW - Distribution

KW - Generalist

KW - Island

KW - Patch

KW - Specialist

KW - Specialist vs. generalist food webs

KW - Species-area

KW - Trophic rank and species-area relationship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032818375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032818375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032818375

VL - 80

SP - 1495

EP - 1504

JO - Ecology

JF - Ecology

SN - 0012-9658

IS - 5

ER -