Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies

William T Mishler, Richard Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

398 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Popular trust in social and political institutions is vital to the consolidation of democracy, but in post-Communist Europe, distrust is the predicted legacy of Communist rule. Contrary to expectations, however, New Democracies Barometer surveys of popular trust in fifteen institutions across nine Eastern and Central European countries indicate that skepticism, rather than distrust, predominates. Although trust varies across institutions and countries, citizens trust holistically, evaluating institutions along a single dimension. Both early life socialization experiences and contemporary performance evaluations influence levels of trust. The legacy of socialization under Communism has mostly indirect effects, whereas the effects of economic and political performance evaluations on trust are larger and more direct. Thus, skepticism reflects trade-offs between public dissatisfaction with current economic performance, optimism about future economic performance, and satisfaction with the political performance of contemporary institutions in providing greater individual liberties than in the Communist past.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)418-451
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume59
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 1997

Fingerprint

post-communist society
political institution
evaluation
performance
socialization
democracy
economics
social institution
communism
optimism
consolidation
citizen
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Trust, distrust and skepticism : Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. / Mishler, William T; Rose, Richard.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 59, No. 2, 05.1997, p. 418-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c6808b88c4cb4543a6410166eb6f539d,
title = "Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies",
abstract = "Popular trust in social and political institutions is vital to the consolidation of democracy, but in post-Communist Europe, distrust is the predicted legacy of Communist rule. Contrary to expectations, however, New Democracies Barometer surveys of popular trust in fifteen institutions across nine Eastern and Central European countries indicate that skepticism, rather than distrust, predominates. Although trust varies across institutions and countries, citizens trust holistically, evaluating institutions along a single dimension. Both early life socialization experiences and contemporary performance evaluations influence levels of trust. The legacy of socialization under Communism has mostly indirect effects, whereas the effects of economic and political performance evaluations on trust are larger and more direct. Thus, skepticism reflects trade-offs between public dissatisfaction with current economic performance, optimism about future economic performance, and satisfaction with the political performance of contemporary institutions in providing greater individual liberties than in the Communist past.",
author = "Mishler, {William T} and Richard Rose",
year = "1997",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "418--451",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust, distrust and skepticism

T2 - Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies

AU - Mishler, William T

AU - Rose, Richard

PY - 1997/5

Y1 - 1997/5

N2 - Popular trust in social and political institutions is vital to the consolidation of democracy, but in post-Communist Europe, distrust is the predicted legacy of Communist rule. Contrary to expectations, however, New Democracies Barometer surveys of popular trust in fifteen institutions across nine Eastern and Central European countries indicate that skepticism, rather than distrust, predominates. Although trust varies across institutions and countries, citizens trust holistically, evaluating institutions along a single dimension. Both early life socialization experiences and contemporary performance evaluations influence levels of trust. The legacy of socialization under Communism has mostly indirect effects, whereas the effects of economic and political performance evaluations on trust are larger and more direct. Thus, skepticism reflects trade-offs between public dissatisfaction with current economic performance, optimism about future economic performance, and satisfaction with the political performance of contemporary institutions in providing greater individual liberties than in the Communist past.

AB - Popular trust in social and political institutions is vital to the consolidation of democracy, but in post-Communist Europe, distrust is the predicted legacy of Communist rule. Contrary to expectations, however, New Democracies Barometer surveys of popular trust in fifteen institutions across nine Eastern and Central European countries indicate that skepticism, rather than distrust, predominates. Although trust varies across institutions and countries, citizens trust holistically, evaluating institutions along a single dimension. Both early life socialization experiences and contemporary performance evaluations influence levels of trust. The legacy of socialization under Communism has mostly indirect effects, whereas the effects of economic and political performance evaluations on trust are larger and more direct. Thus, skepticism reflects trade-offs between public dissatisfaction with current economic performance, optimism about future economic performance, and satisfaction with the political performance of contemporary institutions in providing greater individual liberties than in the Communist past.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031486877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031486877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031486877

VL - 59

SP - 418

EP - 451

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 2

ER -