TU‐E‐217BCD‐05: Dedicated Breast CT: Skin Thickness Measurements in a Diagnostic Population

S. Vedantham, L. Shi, A. Karellas, A. O'connell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the mean skin thickness determined using cone‐beam dedicated breast CT varied between breasts with malignant, hyperplasia and benign pathology, and to determine the appropriate skin thickness for Monte Carlo based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Methods: Breast skin thickness was estimated in 137 women scheduled for biopsy (BI‐RADS 4 or 5), who underwent unilateral cone‐beam dedicated CT of the breast to be biopsied, after providing written informed consent and in adherence to an IRB‐approved protocol. Pathology results were available for 132 women and there were 38 malignancies. A previously reported method [Huang et al., Med Phys 35(4): 1199–206, 2008] was applied to coronal (transverse) images reconstructed to 0.273 mm voxel size. The accuracy of the method was determined by imaging two phantoms of differing wall thickness and shape. For each breast, the mean, intra‐breast standard deviation (SD) and the median skin thickness were computed. The mean skin thickness and associated confidence intervals (CI) in our study population were obtained from the mean skin thickness of each breast. Results: The estimated mean wall thicknesses for both phantoms were within +/−1% of the measured thickness. At the 0.05 level (ANOVA), the skin thickness means did not vary significantly with pathology (p=0.61). For each breast, the median, mean and intra‐breast SD, in mm, were in the range [0.87,2.23], [0.87,2.34], and [0.22,0.85], respectively. From all 137 women, the mean +/− inter‐breast SD and 95% CI were 1.44+/−0.25 and [1.40,1.48], respectively. Conclusions: The skin thickness means were not different between breasts with malignant and non‐malignant pathology. Our estimate of mean skin thickness is in agreement with a previous report. Skin thickness of approximately 1.45 mm, rather than the standard 4 mm [Wu et al., Radiology 193:83–9, 1994], is appropriate for Monte Carlo based determination of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 CA128906 and R21 CA134129. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the NIH or NCI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3914-3915
Number of pages2
JournalMedical physics
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast
Skin
Population
Pathology
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Imaging Phantoms
Confidence Intervals
Organized Financing
Informed Consent
Radiology
Hyperplasia
Analysis of Variance
Biopsy
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

TU‐E‐217BCD‐05 : Dedicated Breast CT: Skin Thickness Measurements in a Diagnostic Population. / Vedantham, S.; Shi, L.; Karellas, A.; O'connell, A.

In: Medical physics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 3914-3915.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vedantham, S. ; Shi, L. ; Karellas, A. ; O'connell, A. / TU‐E‐217BCD‐05 : Dedicated Breast CT: Skin Thickness Measurements in a Diagnostic Population. In: Medical physics. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 3914-3915.
@article{3bd38dabe5a54995baeb87b154a58b67,
title = "TU‐E‐217BCD‐05: Dedicated Breast CT: Skin Thickness Measurements in a Diagnostic Population",
abstract = "Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the mean skin thickness determined using cone‐beam dedicated breast CT varied between breasts with malignant, hyperplasia and benign pathology, and to determine the appropriate skin thickness for Monte Carlo based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Methods: Breast skin thickness was estimated in 137 women scheduled for biopsy (BI‐RADS 4 or 5), who underwent unilateral cone‐beam dedicated CT of the breast to be biopsied, after providing written informed consent and in adherence to an IRB‐approved protocol. Pathology results were available for 132 women and there were 38 malignancies. A previously reported method [Huang et al., Med Phys 35(4): 1199–206, 2008] was applied to coronal (transverse) images reconstructed to 0.273 mm voxel size. The accuracy of the method was determined by imaging two phantoms of differing wall thickness and shape. For each breast, the mean, intra‐breast standard deviation (SD) and the median skin thickness were computed. The mean skin thickness and associated confidence intervals (CI) in our study population were obtained from the mean skin thickness of each breast. Results: The estimated mean wall thicknesses for both phantoms were within +/−1{\%} of the measured thickness. At the 0.05 level (ANOVA), the skin thickness means did not vary significantly with pathology (p=0.61). For each breast, the median, mean and intra‐breast SD, in mm, were in the range [0.87,2.23], [0.87,2.34], and [0.22,0.85], respectively. From all 137 women, the mean +/− inter‐breast SD and 95{\%} CI were 1.44+/−0.25 and [1.40,1.48], respectively. Conclusions: The skin thickness means were not different between breasts with malignant and non‐malignant pathology. Our estimate of mean skin thickness is in agreement with a previous report. Skin thickness of approximately 1.45 mm, rather than the standard 4 mm [Wu et al., Radiology 193:83–9, 1994], is appropriate for Monte Carlo based determination of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 CA128906 and R21 CA134129. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the NIH or NCI.",
author = "S. Vedantham and L. Shi and A. Karellas and A. O'connell",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1118/1.4735977",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "3914--3915",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TU‐E‐217BCD‐05

T2 - Dedicated Breast CT: Skin Thickness Measurements in a Diagnostic Population

AU - Vedantham, S.

AU - Shi, L.

AU - Karellas, A.

AU - O'connell, A.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the mean skin thickness determined using cone‐beam dedicated breast CT varied between breasts with malignant, hyperplasia and benign pathology, and to determine the appropriate skin thickness for Monte Carlo based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Methods: Breast skin thickness was estimated in 137 women scheduled for biopsy (BI‐RADS 4 or 5), who underwent unilateral cone‐beam dedicated CT of the breast to be biopsied, after providing written informed consent and in adherence to an IRB‐approved protocol. Pathology results were available for 132 women and there were 38 malignancies. A previously reported method [Huang et al., Med Phys 35(4): 1199–206, 2008] was applied to coronal (transverse) images reconstructed to 0.273 mm voxel size. The accuracy of the method was determined by imaging two phantoms of differing wall thickness and shape. For each breast, the mean, intra‐breast standard deviation (SD) and the median skin thickness were computed. The mean skin thickness and associated confidence intervals (CI) in our study population were obtained from the mean skin thickness of each breast. Results: The estimated mean wall thicknesses for both phantoms were within +/−1% of the measured thickness. At the 0.05 level (ANOVA), the skin thickness means did not vary significantly with pathology (p=0.61). For each breast, the median, mean and intra‐breast SD, in mm, were in the range [0.87,2.23], [0.87,2.34], and [0.22,0.85], respectively. From all 137 women, the mean +/− inter‐breast SD and 95% CI were 1.44+/−0.25 and [1.40,1.48], respectively. Conclusions: The skin thickness means were not different between breasts with malignant and non‐malignant pathology. Our estimate of mean skin thickness is in agreement with a previous report. Skin thickness of approximately 1.45 mm, rather than the standard 4 mm [Wu et al., Radiology 193:83–9, 1994], is appropriate for Monte Carlo based determination of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 CA128906 and R21 CA134129. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the NIH or NCI.

AB - Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the mean skin thickness determined using cone‐beam dedicated breast CT varied between breasts with malignant, hyperplasia and benign pathology, and to determine the appropriate skin thickness for Monte Carlo based estimation of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Methods: Breast skin thickness was estimated in 137 women scheduled for biopsy (BI‐RADS 4 or 5), who underwent unilateral cone‐beam dedicated CT of the breast to be biopsied, after providing written informed consent and in adherence to an IRB‐approved protocol. Pathology results were available for 132 women and there were 38 malignancies. A previously reported method [Huang et al., Med Phys 35(4): 1199–206, 2008] was applied to coronal (transverse) images reconstructed to 0.273 mm voxel size. The accuracy of the method was determined by imaging two phantoms of differing wall thickness and shape. For each breast, the mean, intra‐breast standard deviation (SD) and the median skin thickness were computed. The mean skin thickness and associated confidence intervals (CI) in our study population were obtained from the mean skin thickness of each breast. Results: The estimated mean wall thicknesses for both phantoms were within +/−1% of the measured thickness. At the 0.05 level (ANOVA), the skin thickness means did not vary significantly with pathology (p=0.61). For each breast, the median, mean and intra‐breast SD, in mm, were in the range [0.87,2.23], [0.87,2.34], and [0.22,0.85], respectively. From all 137 women, the mean +/− inter‐breast SD and 95% CI were 1.44+/−0.25 and [1.40,1.48], respectively. Conclusions: The skin thickness means were not different between breasts with malignant and non‐malignant pathology. Our estimate of mean skin thickness is in agreement with a previous report. Skin thickness of approximately 1.45 mm, rather than the standard 4 mm [Wu et al., Radiology 193:83–9, 1994], is appropriate for Monte Carlo based determination of normalized glandular dose coefficients. Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01 CA128906 and R21 CA134129. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the NIH or NCI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991483187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991483187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4735977

DO - 10.1118/1.4735977

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84991483187

VL - 39

SP - 3914

EP - 3915

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -