Abstract
Two studies, one involving 21 normal volunteers and the other involving 13 sexual deviates, were performed in which subjects' penile and verbal response to various sexual cues were measured. Penile responses were measured by the maximum amplitude of the response to each stimulus and the total response to each stimulus (area under response curve). The two methods of quantifying the penile response were compared in terms of predicting a subject's self-report of sexual arousal, both for individual subjects and for the two populations as a whole. These comparisons revealed that both methods yield strong relationships between penile response and self-report of sexual arousal and no consistent advantage was shown for the maximum amplitude or total response method of measuring penile response. Since the maximum amplitude measure is easier and cheaper to obtain, we recommend its use.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 320-328 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Behavior Therapy |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1981 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)
- Clinical Psychology
Cite this
Two methods of measuring penile response. / Abel, Gene G.; Becker, Judith V; Blanchard, Edward B.; Murphy, William D.; Djenderedjian, Armen.
In: Behavior Therapy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1981, p. 320-328.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Two methods of measuring penile response
AU - Abel, Gene G.
AU - Becker, Judith V
AU - Blanchard, Edward B.
AU - Murphy, William D.
AU - Djenderedjian, Armen
PY - 1981
Y1 - 1981
N2 - Two studies, one involving 21 normal volunteers and the other involving 13 sexual deviates, were performed in which subjects' penile and verbal response to various sexual cues were measured. Penile responses were measured by the maximum amplitude of the response to each stimulus and the total response to each stimulus (area under response curve). The two methods of quantifying the penile response were compared in terms of predicting a subject's self-report of sexual arousal, both for individual subjects and for the two populations as a whole. These comparisons revealed that both methods yield strong relationships between penile response and self-report of sexual arousal and no consistent advantage was shown for the maximum amplitude or total response method of measuring penile response. Since the maximum amplitude measure is easier and cheaper to obtain, we recommend its use.
AB - Two studies, one involving 21 normal volunteers and the other involving 13 sexual deviates, were performed in which subjects' penile and verbal response to various sexual cues were measured. Penile responses were measured by the maximum amplitude of the response to each stimulus and the total response to each stimulus (area under response curve). The two methods of quantifying the penile response were compared in terms of predicting a subject's self-report of sexual arousal, both for individual subjects and for the two populations as a whole. These comparisons revealed that both methods yield strong relationships between penile response and self-report of sexual arousal and no consistent advantage was shown for the maximum amplitude or total response method of measuring penile response. Since the maximum amplitude measure is easier and cheaper to obtain, we recommend its use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019423630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019423630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80121-9
DO - 10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80121-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0019423630
VL - 12
SP - 320
EP - 328
JO - Behavior Therapy
JF - Behavior Therapy
SN - 0005-7894
IS - 3
ER -