Two rivers: The politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management

Gro B. Ween, Benedict J Colombi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sámi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with how such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation's natural-resource management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economies, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and American constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' hierarchies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labeled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted while in the Tana, biological sustainability became prioritized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)478-495
Number of pages18
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Natural resources management
natural resources
resource management
politics
natural resource
Rivers
river
Sustainable development
sustainability
management
extinction
post-colonial society
indigenous population
Norway
Coastal zones
rights
threat
Economics
economy
coast

Keywords

  • Cultural and biological sustainability
  • Indigeneity
  • Politics of nature
  • Postcolonial epistemology
  • Salmon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Two rivers : The politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management. / Ween, Gro B.; Colombi, Benedict J.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 5, No. 2, 2013, p. 478-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87de313bc7be4195bdad720ce5190cfa,
title = "Two rivers: The politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management",
abstract = "This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the S{\'a}mi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with how such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation's natural-resource management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economies, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and American constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' hierarchies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labeled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted while in the Tana, biological sustainability became prioritized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.",
keywords = "Cultural and biological sustainability, Indigeneity, Politics of nature, Postcolonial epistemology, Salmon",
author = "Ween, {Gro B.} and Colombi, {Benedict J}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3390/su5020478",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "478--495",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two rivers

T2 - The politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management

AU - Ween, Gro B.

AU - Colombi, Benedict J

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sámi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with how such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation's natural-resource management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economies, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and American constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' hierarchies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labeled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted while in the Tana, biological sustainability became prioritized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.

AB - This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Norway and Columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. Both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sámi and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with how such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation's natural-resource management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economies, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and American constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' hierarchies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labeled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted while in the Tana, biological sustainability became prioritized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.

KW - Cultural and biological sustainability

KW - Indigeneity

KW - Politics of nature

KW - Postcolonial epistemology

KW - Salmon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882686512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882686512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su5020478

DO - 10.3390/su5020478

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84882686512

VL - 5

SP - 478

EP - 495

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 2

ER -