Two wrongs do not make a right: Responsibility and overdetermination

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper I critically examine Michael Moore's views about responsibility in overdetermination cases. Moore argues for an asymmetrical view concerning actions and omissions: whereas our actions can make us responsible in overdetermination cases, our omissions cannot. Moore argues for this view on the basis of a causal claim: actions can be causes but omissions cannot. I suggest that we should reject Moore's views about responsibility and overdetermination. I argue, in particular, that our omissions (just like our actions) can make us responsible in overdetermination cases. I go on to provide an account of how this may be possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)473-490
Number of pages18
JournalLegal Theory
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

rights and responsibilities
responsibility
cause
Overdetermination
Responsibility
Omission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Two wrongs do not make a right : Responsibility and overdetermination. / Sartorio, Ana C.

In: Legal Theory, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2012, p. 473-490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{52bf91d55dfb44899dd93507af93e908,
title = "Two wrongs do not make a right: Responsibility and overdetermination",
abstract = "In this paper I critically examine Michael Moore's views about responsibility in overdetermination cases. Moore argues for an asymmetrical view concerning actions and omissions: whereas our actions can make us responsible in overdetermination cases, our omissions cannot. Moore argues for this view on the basis of a causal claim: actions can be causes but omissions cannot. I suggest that we should reject Moore's views about responsibility and overdetermination. I argue, in particular, that our omissions (just like our actions) can make us responsible in overdetermination cases. I go on to provide an account of how this may be possible.",
author = "Sartorio, {Ana C}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1017/S1352325212000122",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "473--490",
journal = "Legal Theory",
issn = "1352-3252",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two wrongs do not make a right

T2 - Responsibility and overdetermination

AU - Sartorio, Ana C

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In this paper I critically examine Michael Moore's views about responsibility in overdetermination cases. Moore argues for an asymmetrical view concerning actions and omissions: whereas our actions can make us responsible in overdetermination cases, our omissions cannot. Moore argues for this view on the basis of a causal claim: actions can be causes but omissions cannot. I suggest that we should reject Moore's views about responsibility and overdetermination. I argue, in particular, that our omissions (just like our actions) can make us responsible in overdetermination cases. I go on to provide an account of how this may be possible.

AB - In this paper I critically examine Michael Moore's views about responsibility in overdetermination cases. Moore argues for an asymmetrical view concerning actions and omissions: whereas our actions can make us responsible in overdetermination cases, our omissions cannot. Moore argues for this view on the basis of a causal claim: actions can be causes but omissions cannot. I suggest that we should reject Moore's views about responsibility and overdetermination. I argue, in particular, that our omissions (just like our actions) can make us responsible in overdetermination cases. I go on to provide an account of how this may be possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876994596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876994596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1352325212000122

DO - 10.1017/S1352325212000122

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876994596

VL - 18

SP - 473

EP - 490

JO - Legal Theory

JF - Legal Theory

SN - 1352-3252

IS - 4

ER -