Two-year experience of using pigtail catheters to treat traumatic pneumothorax: A changing trend

Narong Kulvatunyou, Aparna Vijayasekaran, Adam Hansen, Julie L. Wynne, Terence S Okeeffe, Randall S Friese, Bellal A Joseph, Andrew - Tang, Peter M Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The traditional treatment of patients with traumatic hemopneumothorax has been an insertion of a chest tube (CT). But CT, because of its large caliber and significant trauma during an insertion, can cause pain, prevent full lung expansion, and worsen pulmonary outcome. Pigtail catheters (PCs) are smaller and less invasive; they have worked well in patients with nontraumatic pneumothorax (PTX). The purpose of this study was to review our early experience of PC use in trauma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients who required CT or PC placement over a 2-year period (January 2008 through December 2009) at a Level I trauma center. The PCs were 14-French (14-F) Cook catheters placed by the trauma team, using a Seldinger technique. We compared outcome for the subgroups that had CT or PC placed for a PTX. For our statistical analysis, we used the unpaired Student t-test, χ test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test; we considered a p value < 0.05 as significant. Results: Of 9,624 trauma patients evaluated, 94 were treated with PC and 386 with CT. Of the PC patients, 89% was inserted for PTX. When comparing patients with PC and CT inserted for PTX, demographics, tube days, need for mechanical ventilation, and insertion-related complications were similar. The tube failure rate, defined by a requirement for an additional tube or by recurrence that needed intervention, was higher in PC (11%) than in CT (4%) (p = 0.06), but the difference was not statistically significant. We observed a trend of increased PC use over time. Conclusion: PC is safe and can be performed at the bedside. It has a comparable efficacy to CT in patients with PTX. A prospective study is needed to determine the precise role of PC placement, including its indication, the associated tube-site pain, and any significant clinical advantages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1104-1107
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma
Volume71
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Pneumothorax
Catheters
Chest Tubes
Wounds and Injuries
Nonparametric Statistics
Hemopneumothorax
Pain
Lung
Trauma Centers
Artificial Respiration
Demography
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Chest tube
  • Chest wall trauma
  • Pigtail catheter.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Two-year experience of using pigtail catheters to treat traumatic pneumothorax : A changing trend. / Kulvatunyou, Narong; Vijayasekaran, Aparna; Hansen, Adam; Wynne, Julie L.; Okeeffe, Terence S; Friese, Randall S; Joseph, Bellal A; Tang, Andrew -; Rhee, Peter M.

In: Journal of Trauma, Vol. 71, No. 5, 11.2011, p. 1104-1107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a56bdf8c9934613a5a76108fef3f5c7,
title = "Two-year experience of using pigtail catheters to treat traumatic pneumothorax: A changing trend",
abstract = "Background: The traditional treatment of patients with traumatic hemopneumothorax has been an insertion of a chest tube (CT). But CT, because of its large caliber and significant trauma during an insertion, can cause pain, prevent full lung expansion, and worsen pulmonary outcome. Pigtail catheters (PCs) are smaller and less invasive; they have worked well in patients with nontraumatic pneumothorax (PTX). The purpose of this study was to review our early experience of PC use in trauma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients who required CT or PC placement over a 2-year period (January 2008 through December 2009) at a Level I trauma center. The PCs were 14-French (14-F) Cook catheters placed by the trauma team, using a Seldinger technique. We compared outcome for the subgroups that had CT or PC placed for a PTX. For our statistical analysis, we used the unpaired Student t-test, χ test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test; we considered a p value < 0.05 as significant. Results: Of 9,624 trauma patients evaluated, 94 were treated with PC and 386 with CT. Of the PC patients, 89{\%} was inserted for PTX. When comparing patients with PC and CT inserted for PTX, demographics, tube days, need for mechanical ventilation, and insertion-related complications were similar. The tube failure rate, defined by a requirement for an additional tube or by recurrence that needed intervention, was higher in PC (11{\%}) than in CT (4{\%}) (p = 0.06), but the difference was not statistically significant. We observed a trend of increased PC use over time. Conclusion: PC is safe and can be performed at the bedside. It has a comparable efficacy to CT in patients with PTX. A prospective study is needed to determine the precise role of PC placement, including its indication, the associated tube-site pain, and any significant clinical advantages.",
keywords = "Chest tube, Chest wall trauma, Pigtail catheter.",
author = "Narong Kulvatunyou and Aparna Vijayasekaran and Adam Hansen and Wynne, {Julie L.} and Okeeffe, {Terence S} and Friese, {Randall S} and Joseph, {Bellal A} and Tang, {Andrew -} and Rhee, {Peter M}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e31822dd130",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "1104--1107",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-year experience of using pigtail catheters to treat traumatic pneumothorax

T2 - A changing trend

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Vijayasekaran, Aparna

AU - Hansen, Adam

AU - Wynne, Julie L.

AU - Okeeffe, Terence S

AU - Friese, Randall S

AU - Joseph, Bellal A

AU - Tang, Andrew -

AU - Rhee, Peter M

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Background: The traditional treatment of patients with traumatic hemopneumothorax has been an insertion of a chest tube (CT). But CT, because of its large caliber and significant trauma during an insertion, can cause pain, prevent full lung expansion, and worsen pulmonary outcome. Pigtail catheters (PCs) are smaller and less invasive; they have worked well in patients with nontraumatic pneumothorax (PTX). The purpose of this study was to review our early experience of PC use in trauma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients who required CT or PC placement over a 2-year period (January 2008 through December 2009) at a Level I trauma center. The PCs were 14-French (14-F) Cook catheters placed by the trauma team, using a Seldinger technique. We compared outcome for the subgroups that had CT or PC placed for a PTX. For our statistical analysis, we used the unpaired Student t-test, χ test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test; we considered a p value < 0.05 as significant. Results: Of 9,624 trauma patients evaluated, 94 were treated with PC and 386 with CT. Of the PC patients, 89% was inserted for PTX. When comparing patients with PC and CT inserted for PTX, demographics, tube days, need for mechanical ventilation, and insertion-related complications were similar. The tube failure rate, defined by a requirement for an additional tube or by recurrence that needed intervention, was higher in PC (11%) than in CT (4%) (p = 0.06), but the difference was not statistically significant. We observed a trend of increased PC use over time. Conclusion: PC is safe and can be performed at the bedside. It has a comparable efficacy to CT in patients with PTX. A prospective study is needed to determine the precise role of PC placement, including its indication, the associated tube-site pain, and any significant clinical advantages.

AB - Background: The traditional treatment of patients with traumatic hemopneumothorax has been an insertion of a chest tube (CT). But CT, because of its large caliber and significant trauma during an insertion, can cause pain, prevent full lung expansion, and worsen pulmonary outcome. Pigtail catheters (PCs) are smaller and less invasive; they have worked well in patients with nontraumatic pneumothorax (PTX). The purpose of this study was to review our early experience of PC use in trauma patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of trauma patients who required CT or PC placement over a 2-year period (January 2008 through December 2009) at a Level I trauma center. The PCs were 14-French (14-F) Cook catheters placed by the trauma team, using a Seldinger technique. We compared outcome for the subgroups that had CT or PC placed for a PTX. For our statistical analysis, we used the unpaired Student t-test, χ test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test; we considered a p value < 0.05 as significant. Results: Of 9,624 trauma patients evaluated, 94 were treated with PC and 386 with CT. Of the PC patients, 89% was inserted for PTX. When comparing patients with PC and CT inserted for PTX, demographics, tube days, need for mechanical ventilation, and insertion-related complications were similar. The tube failure rate, defined by a requirement for an additional tube or by recurrence that needed intervention, was higher in PC (11%) than in CT (4%) (p = 0.06), but the difference was not statistically significant. We observed a trend of increased PC use over time. Conclusion: PC is safe and can be performed at the bedside. It has a comparable efficacy to CT in patients with PTX. A prospective study is needed to determine the precise role of PC placement, including its indication, the associated tube-site pain, and any significant clinical advantages.

KW - Chest tube

KW - Chest wall trauma

KW - Pigtail catheter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81455140964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81455140964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822dd130

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822dd130

M3 - Article

C2 - 22071915

AN - SCOPUS:81455140964

VL - 71

SP - 1104

EP - 1107

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -