Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access

A meta-analysis and systematic review

Lori A. Stolz, Uwe Stolz, Carol Howe, Isaac J. Farrell, Srikar R Adhikari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine through a systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis whether success rates, time to cannulation, and number of punctures required for peripheral venous access are improved with ultrasound guidance compared with traditional techniques in patients with difficult peripheral venous access. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials. gov, Cumulative Index to Nursing, and Allied Health Literature. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: patients of any age identified as having difficult peripheral venous access; real-time ultrasound guidance was used for peripheral venous cannulation; and inclusion of at least one of these outcomes (success rates, time to successful cannulation and number of punctures required). Results: Seven studies were selected for final analysis. Ultrasound guidance improved success rates when compared with traditional techniques [pooled odds ratio (OR) 3.96; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.75-8.94]. No significant difference between ultrasound-guided techniques and traditional techniques was detected for time to cannulation or number of punctures required. Conclusions: In patients with difficult peripheral venous access, ultrasound guidance increased success rates of peripheral venous placement when compared with traditional techniques. However, ultrasound guidance had no effect on time to successful cannulation or number of punctures required for successful cannulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-326
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Vascular Access
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Catheterization
Meta-Analysis
Punctures
MEDLINE
Libraries
Nursing
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Health

Keywords

  • Cannulation
  • Peripheral venous access
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Nephrology

Cite this

Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access : A meta-analysis and systematic review. / Stolz, Lori A.; Stolz, Uwe; Howe, Carol; Farrell, Isaac J.; Adhikari, Srikar R.

In: Journal of Vascular Access, Vol. 16, No. 4, 01.07.2015, p. 321-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stolz, Lori A. ; Stolz, Uwe ; Howe, Carol ; Farrell, Isaac J. ; Adhikari, Srikar R. / Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access : A meta-analysis and systematic review. In: Journal of Vascular Access. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 321-326.
@article{f93e9c4ad77740b3a5447b26a31d04b4,
title = "Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: A meta-analysis and systematic review",
abstract = "Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine through a systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis whether success rates, time to cannulation, and number of punctures required for peripheral venous access are improved with ultrasound guidance compared with traditional techniques in patients with difficult peripheral venous access. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials. gov, Cumulative Index to Nursing, and Allied Health Literature. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: patients of any age identified as having difficult peripheral venous access; real-time ultrasound guidance was used for peripheral venous cannulation; and inclusion of at least one of these outcomes (success rates, time to successful cannulation and number of punctures required). Results: Seven studies were selected for final analysis. Ultrasound guidance improved success rates when compared with traditional techniques [pooled odds ratio (OR) 3.96; 95{\%} confidence interval (95{\%} CI) 1.75-8.94]. No significant difference between ultrasound-guided techniques and traditional techniques was detected for time to cannulation or number of punctures required. Conclusions: In patients with difficult peripheral venous access, ultrasound guidance increased success rates of peripheral venous placement when compared with traditional techniques. However, ultrasound guidance had no effect on time to successful cannulation or number of punctures required for successful cannulation.",
keywords = "Cannulation, Peripheral venous access, Ultrasound",
author = "Stolz, {Lori A.} and Uwe Stolz and Carol Howe and Farrell, {Isaac J.} and Adhikari, {Srikar R}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5301/jva.5000346",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "321--326",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Access",
issn = "1129-7298",
publisher = "Wichtig Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access

T2 - A meta-analysis and systematic review

AU - Stolz, Lori A.

AU - Stolz, Uwe

AU - Howe, Carol

AU - Farrell, Isaac J.

AU - Adhikari, Srikar R

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine through a systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis whether success rates, time to cannulation, and number of punctures required for peripheral venous access are improved with ultrasound guidance compared with traditional techniques in patients with difficult peripheral venous access. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials. gov, Cumulative Index to Nursing, and Allied Health Literature. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: patients of any age identified as having difficult peripheral venous access; real-time ultrasound guidance was used for peripheral venous cannulation; and inclusion of at least one of these outcomes (success rates, time to successful cannulation and number of punctures required). Results: Seven studies were selected for final analysis. Ultrasound guidance improved success rates when compared with traditional techniques [pooled odds ratio (OR) 3.96; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.75-8.94]. No significant difference between ultrasound-guided techniques and traditional techniques was detected for time to cannulation or number of punctures required. Conclusions: In patients with difficult peripheral venous access, ultrasound guidance increased success rates of peripheral venous placement when compared with traditional techniques. However, ultrasound guidance had no effect on time to successful cannulation or number of punctures required for successful cannulation.

AB - Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine through a systematic review of the literature and metaanalysis whether success rates, time to cannulation, and number of punctures required for peripheral venous access are improved with ultrasound guidance compared with traditional techniques in patients with difficult peripheral venous access. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials. gov, Cumulative Index to Nursing, and Allied Health Literature. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: patients of any age identified as having difficult peripheral venous access; real-time ultrasound guidance was used for peripheral venous cannulation; and inclusion of at least one of these outcomes (success rates, time to successful cannulation and number of punctures required). Results: Seven studies were selected for final analysis. Ultrasound guidance improved success rates when compared with traditional techniques [pooled odds ratio (OR) 3.96; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.75-8.94]. No significant difference between ultrasound-guided techniques and traditional techniques was detected for time to cannulation or number of punctures required. Conclusions: In patients with difficult peripheral venous access, ultrasound guidance increased success rates of peripheral venous placement when compared with traditional techniques. However, ultrasound guidance had no effect on time to successful cannulation or number of punctures required for successful cannulation.

KW - Cannulation

KW - Peripheral venous access

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941220325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941220325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5301/jva.5000346

DO - 10.5301/jva.5000346

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 321

EP - 326

JO - Journal of Vascular Access

JF - Journal of Vascular Access

SN - 1129-7298

IS - 4

ER -