Ultraviolet/high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy of CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110)

F. Thomas, N. Chen, I. Lee, L. Ford, Paul Blowers, R. I. Masel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently there has been some controversy about how CO and benzene adsorb on platinum. With CO, there is disagreement over whether there is back donation of electrons from the metal to the CO 2 π* orbital. With benzene, there is disagreement, over whether benzene adsorbs in a distorted state. In this article we use a standard high resolution electron energy loss (HREELS) spectrometer with modified electronics to measure the equivalent of a ultraviolet (UV) spectrum for two different systems: CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110). In the case of CO, the UV spectrum shows peaks at 5.6 and 8.2 eV that may shift slightly with coverage. By comparison, gas-phase CO shows peaks at 6.2 and 8.3 eV. The difference between the gas-phase peak positions and those on the surface are indicative of the antibonding orbitais being stabilized, as one would expect from the Blyholder model. With benzene we observe two different spectra: a first monolayer spectrum with a broad peak centered at 4.9 eV, and a multilayer spectrum with peaks at 0.75, 3.82, 4.71, 6.20, and 6.84 eV. The multilayer spectrum matches the spectrum of condensed benzene, while the first monolayer spectrum is quite different and resembles that of a diene. Together, these results show that UV/HREELS spectroscopy provides useful information about adsorbates on surfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2339-2344
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Vacuum Science and Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces and Films
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electron energy loss spectroscopy
Carbon Monoxide
Benzene
energy dissipation
benzene
electron energy
high resolution
spectroscopy
ultraviolet spectra
Monolayers
Multilayers
Gases
vapor phases
Electrons
dienes
Adsorbates
Platinum
Spectrometers
Energy dissipation
platinum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Surfaces and Interfaces
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Cite this

Ultraviolet/high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy of CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110). / Thomas, F.; Chen, N.; Lee, I.; Ford, L.; Blowers, Paul; Masel, R. I.

In: Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces and Films, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1999, p. 2339-2344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{961d6e3a98f946d7ac6f0ec5dbb76922,
title = "Ultraviolet/high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy of CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110)",
abstract = "Recently there has been some controversy about how CO and benzene adsorb on platinum. With CO, there is disagreement over whether there is back donation of electrons from the metal to the CO 2 π* orbital. With benzene, there is disagreement, over whether benzene adsorbs in a distorted state. In this article we use a standard high resolution electron energy loss (HREELS) spectrometer with modified electronics to measure the equivalent of a ultraviolet (UV) spectrum for two different systems: CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110). In the case of CO, the UV spectrum shows peaks at 5.6 and 8.2 eV that may shift slightly with coverage. By comparison, gas-phase CO shows peaks at 6.2 and 8.3 eV. The difference between the gas-phase peak positions and those on the surface are indicative of the antibonding orbitais being stabilized, as one would expect from the Blyholder model. With benzene we observe two different spectra: a first monolayer spectrum with a broad peak centered at 4.9 eV, and a multilayer spectrum with peaks at 0.75, 3.82, 4.71, 6.20, and 6.84 eV. The multilayer spectrum matches the spectrum of condensed benzene, while the first monolayer spectrum is quite different and resembles that of a diene. Together, these results show that UV/HREELS spectroscopy provides useful information about adsorbates on surfaces.",
author = "F. Thomas and N. Chen and I. Lee and L. Ford and Paul Blowers and Masel, {R. I.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1116/1.581770",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "2339--2344",
journal = "Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A",
issn = "0734-2101",
publisher = "AVS Science and Technology Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultraviolet/high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy of CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110)

AU - Thomas, F.

AU - Chen, N.

AU - Lee, I.

AU - Ford, L.

AU - Blowers, Paul

AU - Masel, R. I.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Recently there has been some controversy about how CO and benzene adsorb on platinum. With CO, there is disagreement over whether there is back donation of electrons from the metal to the CO 2 π* orbital. With benzene, there is disagreement, over whether benzene adsorbs in a distorted state. In this article we use a standard high resolution electron energy loss (HREELS) spectrometer with modified electronics to measure the equivalent of a ultraviolet (UV) spectrum for two different systems: CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110). In the case of CO, the UV spectrum shows peaks at 5.6 and 8.2 eV that may shift slightly with coverage. By comparison, gas-phase CO shows peaks at 6.2 and 8.3 eV. The difference between the gas-phase peak positions and those on the surface are indicative of the antibonding orbitais being stabilized, as one would expect from the Blyholder model. With benzene we observe two different spectra: a first monolayer spectrum with a broad peak centered at 4.9 eV, and a multilayer spectrum with peaks at 0.75, 3.82, 4.71, 6.20, and 6.84 eV. The multilayer spectrum matches the spectrum of condensed benzene, while the first monolayer spectrum is quite different and resembles that of a diene. Together, these results show that UV/HREELS spectroscopy provides useful information about adsorbates on surfaces.

AB - Recently there has been some controversy about how CO and benzene adsorb on platinum. With CO, there is disagreement over whether there is back donation of electrons from the metal to the CO 2 π* orbital. With benzene, there is disagreement, over whether benzene adsorbs in a distorted state. In this article we use a standard high resolution electron energy loss (HREELS) spectrometer with modified electronics to measure the equivalent of a ultraviolet (UV) spectrum for two different systems: CO on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110) and benzene on Pt(110). In the case of CO, the UV spectrum shows peaks at 5.6 and 8.2 eV that may shift slightly with coverage. By comparison, gas-phase CO shows peaks at 6.2 and 8.3 eV. The difference between the gas-phase peak positions and those on the surface are indicative of the antibonding orbitais being stabilized, as one would expect from the Blyholder model. With benzene we observe two different spectra: a first monolayer spectrum with a broad peak centered at 4.9 eV, and a multilayer spectrum with peaks at 0.75, 3.82, 4.71, 6.20, and 6.84 eV. The multilayer spectrum matches the spectrum of condensed benzene, while the first monolayer spectrum is quite different and resembles that of a diene. Together, these results show that UV/HREELS spectroscopy provides useful information about adsorbates on surfaces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22644448836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22644448836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1116/1.581770

DO - 10.1116/1.581770

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:22644448836

VL - 17

SP - 2339

EP - 2344

JO - Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A

JF - Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A

SN - 0734-2101

IS - 4

ER -