Uncertainties in sea surface turbulent flux algorithms and data sets

Michael A. Brunke, Xubin Zeng, Steven Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An intercomparison of eight bulk sea surface turbulent flux algorithms used in data set generation as well as weather and climate prediction is performed for the tropical Pacific and midlatitude Atlantic. The results show some significant differences in fluxes due to differences in the way the algorithms consider wave spectrum, convective gustiness, and salinity as well as the way the algorithms parameterize roughness lengths and turbulent exchange coefficients. For instance, for sea surface temperature between 27.75°C and 28.25°C, the maximum differences in monthly latent heat flux and wind stress among algorithms over the tropical Pacific are about 23 W m-2 (or 16% relative to the algorithm-averaged flux) and 0.013 N m-2 (or 19% relative to the algorithm-averaged value) respectively. Evaluation of these algorithms using 270 hourly samples of observed turbulent flux data over the midlatitude Pacific shows that algorithms are largely consistent with observations. However, some algorithms show significant deviations from observations under certain conditions (e.g., weak wind conditions). Insights from the above intercomparison are then used to evaluate ocean surface turbulent fluxes from two global data sets, one is derived from satellite remote sensing while the other is a reanalysis. Over two buoy sites in the eastern and western tropical Pacific, the mean heat flux differences between the two data sets are primarily caused by differences in bulk variables (e.g., wind speed) rather than by differences in bulk algorithms. However, bulk algorithm differences could contribute up to 17 W m-2 to the long-term averaged latent heat flux over the tropical Pacific if different algorithms were used. This suggests that both bulk algorithms and the deviation of environmental variables need to be further improved in order to produce ocean surface turbulent fluxes with an accuracy of 10 W m-2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-1
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume107
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 15 2002

Fingerprint

sea surface
Fluxes
Heat flux
heat flux
ocean surface
temperate regions
Latent heat
latent heat
latent heat flux
Uncertainty
Wind stress
deviation
climate prediction
sea surface temperature
wave spectrum
salinity
wind stress
weather
climate
roughness

Keywords

  • Bulk aerodynamic algorithms
  • Global flux data sets
  • Hourly fluxes
  • Monthly fluxes
  • Sea surface turbulent fluxes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geophysics
  • Oceanography
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

Uncertainties in sea surface turbulent flux algorithms and data sets. / Brunke, Michael A.; Zeng, Xubin; Anderson, Steven.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 107, No. 10, 15.10.2002, p. 5-1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{78658a1dc82b4e98b580f8a4e427926f,
title = "Uncertainties in sea surface turbulent flux algorithms and data sets",
abstract = "An intercomparison of eight bulk sea surface turbulent flux algorithms used in data set generation as well as weather and climate prediction is performed for the tropical Pacific and midlatitude Atlantic. The results show some significant differences in fluxes due to differences in the way the algorithms consider wave spectrum, convective gustiness, and salinity as well as the way the algorithms parameterize roughness lengths and turbulent exchange coefficients. For instance, for sea surface temperature between 27.75°C and 28.25°C, the maximum differences in monthly latent heat flux and wind stress among algorithms over the tropical Pacific are about 23 W m-2 (or 16{\%} relative to the algorithm-averaged flux) and 0.013 N m-2 (or 19{\%} relative to the algorithm-averaged value) respectively. Evaluation of these algorithms using 270 hourly samples of observed turbulent flux data over the midlatitude Pacific shows that algorithms are largely consistent with observations. However, some algorithms show significant deviations from observations under certain conditions (e.g., weak wind conditions). Insights from the above intercomparison are then used to evaluate ocean surface turbulent fluxes from two global data sets, one is derived from satellite remote sensing while the other is a reanalysis. Over two buoy sites in the eastern and western tropical Pacific, the mean heat flux differences between the two data sets are primarily caused by differences in bulk variables (e.g., wind speed) rather than by differences in bulk algorithms. However, bulk algorithm differences could contribute up to 17 W m-2 to the long-term averaged latent heat flux over the tropical Pacific if different algorithms were used. This suggests that both bulk algorithms and the deviation of environmental variables need to be further improved in order to produce ocean surface turbulent fluxes with an accuracy of 10 W m-2.",
keywords = "Bulk aerodynamic algorithms, Global flux data sets, Hourly fluxes, Monthly fluxes, Sea surface turbulent fluxes",
author = "Brunke, {Michael A.} and Xubin Zeng and Steven Anderson",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "5--1",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics",
issn = "2169-9380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainties in sea surface turbulent flux algorithms and data sets

AU - Brunke, Michael A.

AU - Zeng, Xubin

AU - Anderson, Steven

PY - 2002/10/15

Y1 - 2002/10/15

N2 - An intercomparison of eight bulk sea surface turbulent flux algorithms used in data set generation as well as weather and climate prediction is performed for the tropical Pacific and midlatitude Atlantic. The results show some significant differences in fluxes due to differences in the way the algorithms consider wave spectrum, convective gustiness, and salinity as well as the way the algorithms parameterize roughness lengths and turbulent exchange coefficients. For instance, for sea surface temperature between 27.75°C and 28.25°C, the maximum differences in monthly latent heat flux and wind stress among algorithms over the tropical Pacific are about 23 W m-2 (or 16% relative to the algorithm-averaged flux) and 0.013 N m-2 (or 19% relative to the algorithm-averaged value) respectively. Evaluation of these algorithms using 270 hourly samples of observed turbulent flux data over the midlatitude Pacific shows that algorithms are largely consistent with observations. However, some algorithms show significant deviations from observations under certain conditions (e.g., weak wind conditions). Insights from the above intercomparison are then used to evaluate ocean surface turbulent fluxes from two global data sets, one is derived from satellite remote sensing while the other is a reanalysis. Over two buoy sites in the eastern and western tropical Pacific, the mean heat flux differences between the two data sets are primarily caused by differences in bulk variables (e.g., wind speed) rather than by differences in bulk algorithms. However, bulk algorithm differences could contribute up to 17 W m-2 to the long-term averaged latent heat flux over the tropical Pacific if different algorithms were used. This suggests that both bulk algorithms and the deviation of environmental variables need to be further improved in order to produce ocean surface turbulent fluxes with an accuracy of 10 W m-2.

AB - An intercomparison of eight bulk sea surface turbulent flux algorithms used in data set generation as well as weather and climate prediction is performed for the tropical Pacific and midlatitude Atlantic. The results show some significant differences in fluxes due to differences in the way the algorithms consider wave spectrum, convective gustiness, and salinity as well as the way the algorithms parameterize roughness lengths and turbulent exchange coefficients. For instance, for sea surface temperature between 27.75°C and 28.25°C, the maximum differences in monthly latent heat flux and wind stress among algorithms over the tropical Pacific are about 23 W m-2 (or 16% relative to the algorithm-averaged flux) and 0.013 N m-2 (or 19% relative to the algorithm-averaged value) respectively. Evaluation of these algorithms using 270 hourly samples of observed turbulent flux data over the midlatitude Pacific shows that algorithms are largely consistent with observations. However, some algorithms show significant deviations from observations under certain conditions (e.g., weak wind conditions). Insights from the above intercomparison are then used to evaluate ocean surface turbulent fluxes from two global data sets, one is derived from satellite remote sensing while the other is a reanalysis. Over two buoy sites in the eastern and western tropical Pacific, the mean heat flux differences between the two data sets are primarily caused by differences in bulk variables (e.g., wind speed) rather than by differences in bulk algorithms. However, bulk algorithm differences could contribute up to 17 W m-2 to the long-term averaged latent heat flux over the tropical Pacific if different algorithms were used. This suggests that both bulk algorithms and the deviation of environmental variables need to be further improved in order to produce ocean surface turbulent fluxes with an accuracy of 10 W m-2.

KW - Bulk aerodynamic algorithms

KW - Global flux data sets

KW - Hourly fluxes

KW - Monthly fluxes

KW - Sea surface turbulent fluxes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037110338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037110338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 5

EP - 1

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

SN - 2169-9380

IS - 10

ER -