Underestimation in the "when it gets worse before it gets better" phenomenon in process improvement

Ricardo Valerdi, Braulio Fernandes

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When people make interventions to a system they expect the effects to be nearly instantaneous. Unfortunately, in most of the cases the intervention intended to improve the process actually causes outcomes to get worse before they get better, if they get better at all. The challenge in these types of situations is being able to readjust expectations that there is a delay in the improvement. This is not simply a case of learning curve where people get better by performing repetitive tasks over time. What we are describing is a delay in the improvement and, in some cases, a degradation of performance. In this paper we discuss why humans tend to underestimate such delays in process improvement across a variety of circumstances. To illustrate this, we compare data collected from a survey with three well-documented scenarios of process improvement: the implementation of a preventative maintenance program at DuPont, the modification of Tiger Woods' golf swing, and the implementation of a platform engineering initiative for the embedded software product line at Rolls-Royce. We discuss potential reasons for the chronic underestimation of these types of improvements and recommend mechanisms for making these estimates more realistic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvanced Concurrent Engineering
Pages3-10
Number of pages8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event18th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, CE 2011 - Boston, MA, United States
Duration: Jul 4 2011Jul 8 2011

Other

Other18th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, CE 2011
CountryUnited States
CityBoston, MA
Period7/4/117/8/11

Fingerprint

Embedded software
Wood
Degradation

Keywords

  • Hyperbolic discounting
  • Improvement paradox
  • Planning fallacy
  • Process delays
  • System dynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software

Cite this

Underestimation in the "when it gets worse before it gets better" phenomenon in process improvement. / Valerdi, Ricardo; Fernandes, Braulio.

Advanced Concurrent Engineering. 2011. p. 3-10.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Valerdi, R & Fernandes, B 2011, Underestimation in the "when it gets worse before it gets better" phenomenon in process improvement. in Advanced Concurrent Engineering. pp. 3-10, 18th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, CE 2011, Boston, MA, United States, 7/4/11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_1
@inproceedings{4c2d020c256e422eabb5b568babe2475,
title = "Underestimation in the {"}when it gets worse before it gets better{"} phenomenon in process improvement",
abstract = "When people make interventions to a system they expect the effects to be nearly instantaneous. Unfortunately, in most of the cases the intervention intended to improve the process actually causes outcomes to get worse before they get better, if they get better at all. The challenge in these types of situations is being able to readjust expectations that there is a delay in the improvement. This is not simply a case of learning curve where people get better by performing repetitive tasks over time. What we are describing is a delay in the improvement and, in some cases, a degradation of performance. In this paper we discuss why humans tend to underestimate such delays in process improvement across a variety of circumstances. To illustrate this, we compare data collected from a survey with three well-documented scenarios of process improvement: the implementation of a preventative maintenance program at DuPont, the modification of Tiger Woods' golf swing, and the implementation of a platform engineering initiative for the embedded software product line at Rolls-Royce. We discuss potential reasons for the chronic underestimation of these types of improvements and recommend mechanisms for making these estimates more realistic.",
keywords = "Hyperbolic discounting, Improvement paradox, Planning fallacy, Process delays, System dynamics",
author = "Ricardo Valerdi and Braulio Fernandes",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780857297983",
pages = "3--10",
booktitle = "Advanced Concurrent Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Underestimation in the "when it gets worse before it gets better" phenomenon in process improvement

AU - Valerdi, Ricardo

AU - Fernandes, Braulio

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - When people make interventions to a system they expect the effects to be nearly instantaneous. Unfortunately, in most of the cases the intervention intended to improve the process actually causes outcomes to get worse before they get better, if they get better at all. The challenge in these types of situations is being able to readjust expectations that there is a delay in the improvement. This is not simply a case of learning curve where people get better by performing repetitive tasks over time. What we are describing is a delay in the improvement and, in some cases, a degradation of performance. In this paper we discuss why humans tend to underestimate such delays in process improvement across a variety of circumstances. To illustrate this, we compare data collected from a survey with three well-documented scenarios of process improvement: the implementation of a preventative maintenance program at DuPont, the modification of Tiger Woods' golf swing, and the implementation of a platform engineering initiative for the embedded software product line at Rolls-Royce. We discuss potential reasons for the chronic underestimation of these types of improvements and recommend mechanisms for making these estimates more realistic.

AB - When people make interventions to a system they expect the effects to be nearly instantaneous. Unfortunately, in most of the cases the intervention intended to improve the process actually causes outcomes to get worse before they get better, if they get better at all. The challenge in these types of situations is being able to readjust expectations that there is a delay in the improvement. This is not simply a case of learning curve where people get better by performing repetitive tasks over time. What we are describing is a delay in the improvement and, in some cases, a degradation of performance. In this paper we discuss why humans tend to underestimate such delays in process improvement across a variety of circumstances. To illustrate this, we compare data collected from a survey with three well-documented scenarios of process improvement: the implementation of a preventative maintenance program at DuPont, the modification of Tiger Woods' golf swing, and the implementation of a platform engineering initiative for the embedded software product line at Rolls-Royce. We discuss potential reasons for the chronic underestimation of these types of improvements and recommend mechanisms for making these estimates more realistic.

KW - Hyperbolic discounting

KW - Improvement paradox

KW - Planning fallacy

KW - Process delays

KW - System dynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870193507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870193507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_1

DO - 10.1007/978-0-85729-799-0_1

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84870193507

SN - 9780857297983

SP - 3

EP - 10

BT - Advanced Concurrent Engineering

ER -