Understanding health literacy measurement through eye tracking

Michael Mackert, Sara E. Champlin, Keryn E. Pasch, Barry D Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study used eye-tracking technology to explore how individuals with different levels of health literacy visualize health-related information. The authors recruited 25 university administrative staff (more likely to have adequate health literacy skills) and 25 adults enrolled in an adult literacy program (more likely to have limited health literacy skills). The authors administered the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment to each participant. The assessment involves having individuals answer questions about a nutrition label while viewing the label. The authors used computerized eye-tracking technology to measure the amount of time each participant spent fixing their view at nutrition label information that was relevant to the questions being asked and the amount of time they spent viewing nonrelevant information. Results showed that lower NVS scores were significantly associated with more time spent on information not relevant for answering the NVS items. This finding suggests that efforts to improve health literacy measurement should include the ability to differentiate not just between individuals who have difficulty interpreting and using health information, but also between those who have difficulty finding relevant information. In addition, this finding suggests that health education material should minimize the inclusion of nonrelevant information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-196
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume18
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 4 2013

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
literacy
Health
Vital Signs
health
Labels
nutrition
Technology
Nutrition
Health Education
Health Status
health information
health promotion
Education
inclusion
staff
university
ability
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Communication
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Understanding health literacy measurement through eye tracking. / Mackert, Michael; Champlin, Sara E.; Pasch, Keryn E.; Weiss, Barry D.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 18, No. SUPPL. 1, 04.12.2013, p. 185-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mackert, Michael ; Champlin, Sara E. ; Pasch, Keryn E. ; Weiss, Barry D. / Understanding health literacy measurement through eye tracking. In: Journal of Health Communication. 2013 ; Vol. 18, No. SUPPL. 1. pp. 185-196.
@article{f37067eb54f9430d9028a470b76f18bc,
title = "Understanding health literacy measurement through eye tracking",
abstract = "This study used eye-tracking technology to explore how individuals with different levels of health literacy visualize health-related information. The authors recruited 25 university administrative staff (more likely to have adequate health literacy skills) and 25 adults enrolled in an adult literacy program (more likely to have limited health literacy skills). The authors administered the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment to each participant. The assessment involves having individuals answer questions about a nutrition label while viewing the label. The authors used computerized eye-tracking technology to measure the amount of time each participant spent fixing their view at nutrition label information that was relevant to the questions being asked and the amount of time they spent viewing nonrelevant information. Results showed that lower NVS scores were significantly associated with more time spent on information not relevant for answering the NVS items. This finding suggests that efforts to improve health literacy measurement should include the ability to differentiate not just between individuals who have difficulty interpreting and using health information, but also between those who have difficulty finding relevant information. In addition, this finding suggests that health education material should minimize the inclusion of nonrelevant information.",
author = "Michael Mackert and Champlin, {Sara E.} and Pasch, {Keryn E.} and Weiss, {Barry D}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2013.825666",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "185--196",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding health literacy measurement through eye tracking

AU - Mackert, Michael

AU - Champlin, Sara E.

AU - Pasch, Keryn E.

AU - Weiss, Barry D

PY - 2013/12/4

Y1 - 2013/12/4

N2 - This study used eye-tracking technology to explore how individuals with different levels of health literacy visualize health-related information. The authors recruited 25 university administrative staff (more likely to have adequate health literacy skills) and 25 adults enrolled in an adult literacy program (more likely to have limited health literacy skills). The authors administered the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment to each participant. The assessment involves having individuals answer questions about a nutrition label while viewing the label. The authors used computerized eye-tracking technology to measure the amount of time each participant spent fixing their view at nutrition label information that was relevant to the questions being asked and the amount of time they spent viewing nonrelevant information. Results showed that lower NVS scores were significantly associated with more time spent on information not relevant for answering the NVS items. This finding suggests that efforts to improve health literacy measurement should include the ability to differentiate not just between individuals who have difficulty interpreting and using health information, but also between those who have difficulty finding relevant information. In addition, this finding suggests that health education material should minimize the inclusion of nonrelevant information.

AB - This study used eye-tracking technology to explore how individuals with different levels of health literacy visualize health-related information. The authors recruited 25 university administrative staff (more likely to have adequate health literacy skills) and 25 adults enrolled in an adult literacy program (more likely to have limited health literacy skills). The authors administered the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment to each participant. The assessment involves having individuals answer questions about a nutrition label while viewing the label. The authors used computerized eye-tracking technology to measure the amount of time each participant spent fixing their view at nutrition label information that was relevant to the questions being asked and the amount of time they spent viewing nonrelevant information. Results showed that lower NVS scores were significantly associated with more time spent on information not relevant for answering the NVS items. This finding suggests that efforts to improve health literacy measurement should include the ability to differentiate not just between individuals who have difficulty interpreting and using health information, but also between those who have difficulty finding relevant information. In addition, this finding suggests that health education material should minimize the inclusion of nonrelevant information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885642392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885642392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2013.825666

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2013.825666

M3 - Article

C2 - 24093355

AN - SCOPUS:84885642392

VL - 18

SP - 185

EP - 196

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -