Understanding risk-taking behavior of groups

A "decision analysis" perspective

Joseph S Valacich, Saonee Sarker, Jamie Pratt, Mike Groomer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Past research has extensively investigated the effect of media, especially focusing on how anonymity increases risk-related behaviors of groups when using computer-mediated communication (CMC). This study extends prior research by examining the differences in group risk-taking behaviors between face-to-face groups and completely non-anonymous CMC groups (i.e., groups working in a fully identified, synchronous CMC environment similar to popular instant messaging systems utilized widely within organizations). Drawing on the "decision analysis" perspective, a key framework for understanding organizational decision-making, the study also examines the effects of the firm's risk preferences as well as the type of information distribution among group members (i.e., full information known to all group members versus partial information know by only some of the members) on the groups' risk-taking behaviors. Results from a laboratory experiment using student subjects found no differences in risk-taking behaviors between CMC and face-to-face groups; additionally, no differences were found related to how information was distributed among group members. A significant effect was found, however, for the risk preference of the firm, showing that risk-neutral firms influenced groups to make riskier decisions than groups from risk-averse firms. Finally, groups within risk-neutral firms receiving partial information made riskier decisions than groups receiving full information. The implications of these results for future research and practice are examined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)902-912
Number of pages11
JournalDecision Support Systems
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Decision theory
Risk-Taking
Communication
Organizational Decision Making
Information Dissemination
Research
Computer-mediated communication
Risk-taking behavior
Decision analysis
Risk Taking
Students
Decision making
Risk preferences
Partial information
Risky decisions
Computer-mediated Communication

Keywords

  • Computer-mediated groups
  • Decision analysis
  • Firm risk preference
  • Group risk-taking behavior
  • Hidden profile tasks
  • Types of anonymity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Understanding risk-taking behavior of groups : A "decision analysis" perspective. / Valacich, Joseph S; Sarker, Saonee; Pratt, Jamie; Groomer, Mike.

In: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 46, No. 4, 03.2009, p. 902-912.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valacich, Joseph S ; Sarker, Saonee ; Pratt, Jamie ; Groomer, Mike. / Understanding risk-taking behavior of groups : A "decision analysis" perspective. In: Decision Support Systems. 2009 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 902-912.
@article{fe8ef9a7e09b4119af7c04ad7d7550c3,
title = "Understanding risk-taking behavior of groups: A {"}decision analysis{"} perspective",
abstract = "Past research has extensively investigated the effect of media, especially focusing on how anonymity increases risk-related behaviors of groups when using computer-mediated communication (CMC). This study extends prior research by examining the differences in group risk-taking behaviors between face-to-face groups and completely non-anonymous CMC groups (i.e., groups working in a fully identified, synchronous CMC environment similar to popular instant messaging systems utilized widely within organizations). Drawing on the {"}decision analysis{"} perspective, a key framework for understanding organizational decision-making, the study also examines the effects of the firm's risk preferences as well as the type of information distribution among group members (i.e., full information known to all group members versus partial information know by only some of the members) on the groups' risk-taking behaviors. Results from a laboratory experiment using student subjects found no differences in risk-taking behaviors between CMC and face-to-face groups; additionally, no differences were found related to how information was distributed among group members. A significant effect was found, however, for the risk preference of the firm, showing that risk-neutral firms influenced groups to make riskier decisions than groups from risk-averse firms. Finally, groups within risk-neutral firms receiving partial information made riskier decisions than groups receiving full information. The implications of these results for future research and practice are examined.",
keywords = "Computer-mediated groups, Decision analysis, Firm risk preference, Group risk-taking behavior, Hidden profile tasks, Types of anonymity",
author = "Valacich, {Joseph S} and Saonee Sarker and Jamie Pratt and Mike Groomer",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.dss.2008.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "902--912",
journal = "Decision Support Systems",
issn = "0167-9236",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding risk-taking behavior of groups

T2 - A "decision analysis" perspective

AU - Valacich, Joseph S

AU - Sarker, Saonee

AU - Pratt, Jamie

AU - Groomer, Mike

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Past research has extensively investigated the effect of media, especially focusing on how anonymity increases risk-related behaviors of groups when using computer-mediated communication (CMC). This study extends prior research by examining the differences in group risk-taking behaviors between face-to-face groups and completely non-anonymous CMC groups (i.e., groups working in a fully identified, synchronous CMC environment similar to popular instant messaging systems utilized widely within organizations). Drawing on the "decision analysis" perspective, a key framework for understanding organizational decision-making, the study also examines the effects of the firm's risk preferences as well as the type of information distribution among group members (i.e., full information known to all group members versus partial information know by only some of the members) on the groups' risk-taking behaviors. Results from a laboratory experiment using student subjects found no differences in risk-taking behaviors between CMC and face-to-face groups; additionally, no differences were found related to how information was distributed among group members. A significant effect was found, however, for the risk preference of the firm, showing that risk-neutral firms influenced groups to make riskier decisions than groups from risk-averse firms. Finally, groups within risk-neutral firms receiving partial information made riskier decisions than groups receiving full information. The implications of these results for future research and practice are examined.

AB - Past research has extensively investigated the effect of media, especially focusing on how anonymity increases risk-related behaviors of groups when using computer-mediated communication (CMC). This study extends prior research by examining the differences in group risk-taking behaviors between face-to-face groups and completely non-anonymous CMC groups (i.e., groups working in a fully identified, synchronous CMC environment similar to popular instant messaging systems utilized widely within organizations). Drawing on the "decision analysis" perspective, a key framework for understanding organizational decision-making, the study also examines the effects of the firm's risk preferences as well as the type of information distribution among group members (i.e., full information known to all group members versus partial information know by only some of the members) on the groups' risk-taking behaviors. Results from a laboratory experiment using student subjects found no differences in risk-taking behaviors between CMC and face-to-face groups; additionally, no differences were found related to how information was distributed among group members. A significant effect was found, however, for the risk preference of the firm, showing that risk-neutral firms influenced groups to make riskier decisions than groups from risk-averse firms. Finally, groups within risk-neutral firms receiving partial information made riskier decisions than groups receiving full information. The implications of these results for future research and practice are examined.

KW - Computer-mediated groups

KW - Decision analysis

KW - Firm risk preference

KW - Group risk-taking behavior

KW - Hidden profile tasks

KW - Types of anonymity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61349121969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61349121969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dss.2008.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.dss.2008.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 902

EP - 912

JO - Decision Support Systems

JF - Decision Support Systems

SN - 0167-9236

IS - 4

ER -