Universal consent practice in academic intensive care units (ICUs)

Lance Stuke, Andrew Jennings, Mark Gunst, Tracy Tyner, Randall S Friese, Terence S Okeeffe, Heidi Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine national practice for obtaining consent in academic adult intensive care units (ICUs) for routine bedside procedures and to define universal consent rates by patient demographics within our own institutionĝ™s ICUs. Methods: A 10-question survey was sent to the program directors for all U.S. surgical and pulmonary critical care directors regarding consent practices. Further, the adoption of a universal consent protocol in an academic county hospital was studied. Results: Cross-sectional study: Thirty-seven percent of program directors completed the survey. Consent rates varied from 35% to 97% by procedure, with only 14% using a universal consent document. Providers in Medical ICUs obtained consent more often than in Surgical ICUs for both central line and pulmonary artery catheter placement (82.8% and 93.1% vs. 52.6% and 52.6%, respectively). Prospective cohort study: At our institution, 90% of 363 patients or their proxies signed universal consent for procedures, 4.4% consent with exemptions, while 5.2% refused. Insured patients were 2.7 times more likely to sign full universal consent for bedside ICU procedures than uninsured patients. Conclusion: There was a national variation in ICU consent practices with an interest in a wider usage of universal consent protocols. The latter was adopted differentially based on patient demographics. Universal consent was widely accepted at our institution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-52
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Intensive Care Medicine
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Critical Care
Demography
Consent Forms
County Hospitals
antineoplaston A10
Proxy
Pulmonary Artery
Cohort Studies
Catheters
Cross-Sectional Studies
Prospective Studies
Lung
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Informed consent
  • Intensive care unit
  • Invasive procedures
  • Medical intensive care unit
  • Surgical intensive care unit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Universal consent practice in academic intensive care units (ICUs). / Stuke, Lance; Jennings, Andrew; Gunst, Mark; Tyner, Tracy; Friese, Randall S; Okeeffe, Terence S; Frankel, Heidi.

In: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 46-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stuke, Lance ; Jennings, Andrew ; Gunst, Mark ; Tyner, Tracy ; Friese, Randall S ; Okeeffe, Terence S ; Frankel, Heidi. / Universal consent practice in academic intensive care units (ICUs). In: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 46-52.
@article{167ead2671644536b7aa74f53eeb5709,
title = "Universal consent practice in academic intensive care units (ICUs)",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine national practice for obtaining consent in academic adult intensive care units (ICUs) for routine bedside procedures and to define universal consent rates by patient demographics within our own institutionĝ™s ICUs. Methods: A 10-question survey was sent to the program directors for all U.S. surgical and pulmonary critical care directors regarding consent practices. Further, the adoption of a universal consent protocol in an academic county hospital was studied. Results: Cross-sectional study: Thirty-seven percent of program directors completed the survey. Consent rates varied from 35{\%} to 97{\%} by procedure, with only 14{\%} using a universal consent document. Providers in Medical ICUs obtained consent more often than in Surgical ICUs for both central line and pulmonary artery catheter placement (82.8{\%} and 93.1{\%} vs. 52.6{\%} and 52.6{\%}, respectively). Prospective cohort study: At our institution, 90{\%} of 363 patients or their proxies signed universal consent for procedures, 4.4{\%} consent with exemptions, while 5.2{\%} refused. Insured patients were 2.7 times more likely to sign full universal consent for bedside ICU procedures than uninsured patients. Conclusion: There was a national variation in ICU consent practices with an interest in a wider usage of universal consent protocols. The latter was adopted differentially based on patient demographics. Universal consent was widely accepted at our institution.",
keywords = "Informed consent, Intensive care unit, Invasive procedures, Medical intensive care unit, Surgical intensive care unit",
author = "Lance Stuke and Andrew Jennings and Mark Gunst and Tracy Tyner and Friese, {Randall S} and Okeeffe, {Terence S} and Heidi Frankel",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0885066609350982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "46--52",
journal = "Journal of Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0885-0666",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Universal consent practice in academic intensive care units (ICUs)

AU - Stuke, Lance

AU - Jennings, Andrew

AU - Gunst, Mark

AU - Tyner, Tracy

AU - Friese, Randall S

AU - Okeeffe, Terence S

AU - Frankel, Heidi

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine national practice for obtaining consent in academic adult intensive care units (ICUs) for routine bedside procedures and to define universal consent rates by patient demographics within our own institutionĝ™s ICUs. Methods: A 10-question survey was sent to the program directors for all U.S. surgical and pulmonary critical care directors regarding consent practices. Further, the adoption of a universal consent protocol in an academic county hospital was studied. Results: Cross-sectional study: Thirty-seven percent of program directors completed the survey. Consent rates varied from 35% to 97% by procedure, with only 14% using a universal consent document. Providers in Medical ICUs obtained consent more often than in Surgical ICUs for both central line and pulmonary artery catheter placement (82.8% and 93.1% vs. 52.6% and 52.6%, respectively). Prospective cohort study: At our institution, 90% of 363 patients or their proxies signed universal consent for procedures, 4.4% consent with exemptions, while 5.2% refused. Insured patients were 2.7 times more likely to sign full universal consent for bedside ICU procedures than uninsured patients. Conclusion: There was a national variation in ICU consent practices with an interest in a wider usage of universal consent protocols. The latter was adopted differentially based on patient demographics. Universal consent was widely accepted at our institution.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine national practice for obtaining consent in academic adult intensive care units (ICUs) for routine bedside procedures and to define universal consent rates by patient demographics within our own institutionĝ™s ICUs. Methods: A 10-question survey was sent to the program directors for all U.S. surgical and pulmonary critical care directors regarding consent practices. Further, the adoption of a universal consent protocol in an academic county hospital was studied. Results: Cross-sectional study: Thirty-seven percent of program directors completed the survey. Consent rates varied from 35% to 97% by procedure, with only 14% using a universal consent document. Providers in Medical ICUs obtained consent more often than in Surgical ICUs for both central line and pulmonary artery catheter placement (82.8% and 93.1% vs. 52.6% and 52.6%, respectively). Prospective cohort study: At our institution, 90% of 363 patients or their proxies signed universal consent for procedures, 4.4% consent with exemptions, while 5.2% refused. Insured patients were 2.7 times more likely to sign full universal consent for bedside ICU procedures than uninsured patients. Conclusion: There was a national variation in ICU consent practices with an interest in a wider usage of universal consent protocols. The latter was adopted differentially based on patient demographics. Universal consent was widely accepted at our institution.

KW - Informed consent

KW - Intensive care unit

KW - Invasive procedures

KW - Medical intensive care unit

KW - Surgical intensive care unit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76149107899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76149107899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0885066609350982

DO - 10.1177/0885066609350982

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 46

EP - 52

JO - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

JF - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0885-0666

IS - 1

ER -