Unsafe knowledge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ernest Sosa has argued that if someone knows that p, then his belief that p is "safe". and Timothy Williamson has agreed. In this paper I argue that safety, as defined by Sosa, is not a necessary condition on knowledge - that we can have unsafe knowledge. I present Sosa's definition of safety and a counterexample to it as a necessary condition on knowledge. I also argue that Sosa's most recent refinements to the notion of safety don't help him to avoid the counterexample. I consider three replies on behalf of the defender of safety, and find them all wanting. Finally, I offer a tentative diagnosis of my counterexample.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)395-404
Number of pages10
JournalSynthese
Volume146
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Safety
Counterexample
Ernest Sosa
Defenders
Timothy Williamson

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Unsafe knowledge. / Comesana, Juan M.

In: Synthese, Vol. 146, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 395-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Comesana, Juan M. / Unsafe knowledge. In: Synthese. 2005 ; Vol. 146, No. 3. pp. 395-404.
@article{f4cdcc13280a4b68932de1872896602e,
title = "Unsafe knowledge",
abstract = "Ernest Sosa has argued that if someone knows that p, then his belief that p is {"}safe{"}. and Timothy Williamson has agreed. In this paper I argue that safety, as defined by Sosa, is not a necessary condition on knowledge - that we can have unsafe knowledge. I present Sosa's definition of safety and a counterexample to it as a necessary condition on knowledge. I also argue that Sosa's most recent refinements to the notion of safety don't help him to avoid the counterexample. I consider three replies on behalf of the defender of safety, and find them all wanting. Finally, I offer a tentative diagnosis of my counterexample.",
author = "Comesana, {Juan M}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "146",
pages = "395--404",
journal = "Synthese",
issn = "0039-7857",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unsafe knowledge

AU - Comesana, Juan M

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Ernest Sosa has argued that if someone knows that p, then his belief that p is "safe". and Timothy Williamson has agreed. In this paper I argue that safety, as defined by Sosa, is not a necessary condition on knowledge - that we can have unsafe knowledge. I present Sosa's definition of safety and a counterexample to it as a necessary condition on knowledge. I also argue that Sosa's most recent refinements to the notion of safety don't help him to avoid the counterexample. I consider three replies on behalf of the defender of safety, and find them all wanting. Finally, I offer a tentative diagnosis of my counterexample.

AB - Ernest Sosa has argued that if someone knows that p, then his belief that p is "safe". and Timothy Williamson has agreed. In this paper I argue that safety, as defined by Sosa, is not a necessary condition on knowledge - that we can have unsafe knowledge. I present Sosa's definition of safety and a counterexample to it as a necessary condition on knowledge. I also argue that Sosa's most recent refinements to the notion of safety don't help him to avoid the counterexample. I consider three replies on behalf of the defender of safety, and find them all wanting. Finally, I offer a tentative diagnosis of my counterexample.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25444481925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25444481925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7

DO - 10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7

M3 - Article

VL - 146

SP - 395

EP - 404

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

SN - 0039-7857

IS - 3

ER -