Urologic diseases in America project: Urolithiasis

Margaret S. Pearle, Elizabeth Calhoun, Gary C. Curhan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

532 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We quantified the burden of urolithiasis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. Materials and Methods: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously. Results: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of urolithiasis decreased by 15% and hospital length of stay decreased from 2.6 to 2.2 days between 1994 and 2000. Rates of hospitalization were 2.5 to 3-fold higher for Medicare beneficiaries with little change between 1992 and 1998. Almost 2 million outpatient visits for a primary diagnosis of urolithiasis were recorded in 2000. Hospital outpatient visits increased by 40% between 1994 and 2000 and physician office visits increased by 43% between 1992 and 2000. In the Medicare population hospital outpatient and office visits increased by 29% and 41%, respectively, between 1992 and 1998. The distribution of surgical procedures remained relatively stable through the 1990s. Shock wave lithotripsy was the most commonly performed procedure, followed closely by ureteroscopy. Overall the total estimated annual expenditure for individuals with claims for a diagnosis of urolithiasis was almost $2.1 billion in 2000, representing a 50% increase since 1994. Conclusions: The cost of urolithiasis is estimated at almost $2 billion annually and it appears to be increasing with time despite a shift in inpatient to outpatient treatment and the emergence of minimally invasive treatment modalities, perhaps because the prevalence of stone disease is increasing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)848-857
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume173
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urologic Diseases
Urolithiasis
Outpatients
Office Visits
Medicare
Inpatients
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Ureteroscopy
Physicians' Offices
Lithotripsy
Health Resources
Health Expenditures
Economics
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics
Population

Keywords

  • Cost and cost analysis
  • Hospitalization
  • Prevalence
  • Urinary calculi
  • Urinary tract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Urologic diseases in America project : Urolithiasis. / Pearle, Margaret S.; Calhoun, Elizabeth; Curhan, Gary C.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 173, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 848-857.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pearle, Margaret S. ; Calhoun, Elizabeth ; Curhan, Gary C. / Urologic diseases in America project : Urolithiasis. In: Journal of Urology. 2005 ; Vol. 173, No. 3. pp. 848-857.
@article{4101739c26cb468f9b3e2992e5bfe374,
title = "Urologic diseases in America project: Urolithiasis",
abstract = "Purpose: We quantified the burden of urolithiasis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. Materials and Methods: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously. Results: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of urolithiasis decreased by 15{\%} and hospital length of stay decreased from 2.6 to 2.2 days between 1994 and 2000. Rates of hospitalization were 2.5 to 3-fold higher for Medicare beneficiaries with little change between 1992 and 1998. Almost 2 million outpatient visits for a primary diagnosis of urolithiasis were recorded in 2000. Hospital outpatient visits increased by 40{\%} between 1994 and 2000 and physician office visits increased by 43{\%} between 1992 and 2000. In the Medicare population hospital outpatient and office visits increased by 29{\%} and 41{\%}, respectively, between 1992 and 1998. The distribution of surgical procedures remained relatively stable through the 1990s. Shock wave lithotripsy was the most commonly performed procedure, followed closely by ureteroscopy. Overall the total estimated annual expenditure for individuals with claims for a diagnosis of urolithiasis was almost $2.1 billion in 2000, representing a 50{\%} increase since 1994. Conclusions: The cost of urolithiasis is estimated at almost $2 billion annually and it appears to be increasing with time despite a shift in inpatient to outpatient treatment and the emergence of minimally invasive treatment modalities, perhaps because the prevalence of stone disease is increasing.",
keywords = "Cost and cost analysis, Hospitalization, Prevalence, Urinary calculi, Urinary tract",
author = "Pearle, {Margaret S.} and Elizabeth Calhoun and Curhan, {Gary C.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "173",
pages = "848--857",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urologic diseases in America project

T2 - Urolithiasis

AU - Pearle, Margaret S.

AU - Calhoun, Elizabeth

AU - Curhan, Gary C.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Purpose: We quantified the burden of urolithiasis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. Materials and Methods: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously. Results: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of urolithiasis decreased by 15% and hospital length of stay decreased from 2.6 to 2.2 days between 1994 and 2000. Rates of hospitalization were 2.5 to 3-fold higher for Medicare beneficiaries with little change between 1992 and 1998. Almost 2 million outpatient visits for a primary diagnosis of urolithiasis were recorded in 2000. Hospital outpatient visits increased by 40% between 1994 and 2000 and physician office visits increased by 43% between 1992 and 2000. In the Medicare population hospital outpatient and office visits increased by 29% and 41%, respectively, between 1992 and 1998. The distribution of surgical procedures remained relatively stable through the 1990s. Shock wave lithotripsy was the most commonly performed procedure, followed closely by ureteroscopy. Overall the total estimated annual expenditure for individuals with claims for a diagnosis of urolithiasis was almost $2.1 billion in 2000, representing a 50% increase since 1994. Conclusions: The cost of urolithiasis is estimated at almost $2 billion annually and it appears to be increasing with time despite a shift in inpatient to outpatient treatment and the emergence of minimally invasive treatment modalities, perhaps because the prevalence of stone disease is increasing.

AB - Purpose: We quantified the burden of urolithiasis in the United States by identifying trends in the use of health care resources and estimating the economic impact of the disease. Materials and Methods: The analytical methods used to generate these results have been described previously. Results: The rate of national inpatient hospitalizations for a diagnosis of urolithiasis decreased by 15% and hospital length of stay decreased from 2.6 to 2.2 days between 1994 and 2000. Rates of hospitalization were 2.5 to 3-fold higher for Medicare beneficiaries with little change between 1992 and 1998. Almost 2 million outpatient visits for a primary diagnosis of urolithiasis were recorded in 2000. Hospital outpatient visits increased by 40% between 1994 and 2000 and physician office visits increased by 43% between 1992 and 2000. In the Medicare population hospital outpatient and office visits increased by 29% and 41%, respectively, between 1992 and 1998. The distribution of surgical procedures remained relatively stable through the 1990s. Shock wave lithotripsy was the most commonly performed procedure, followed closely by ureteroscopy. Overall the total estimated annual expenditure for individuals with claims for a diagnosis of urolithiasis was almost $2.1 billion in 2000, representing a 50% increase since 1994. Conclusions: The cost of urolithiasis is estimated at almost $2 billion annually and it appears to be increasing with time despite a shift in inpatient to outpatient treatment and the emergence of minimally invasive treatment modalities, perhaps because the prevalence of stone disease is increasing.

KW - Cost and cost analysis

KW - Hospitalization

KW - Prevalence

KW - Urinary calculi

KW - Urinary tract

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13744257116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13744257116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7

DO - 10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7

M3 - Article

C2 - 15711292

AN - SCOPUS:13744257116

VL - 173

SP - 848

EP - 857

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3

ER -