Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative

Marian L. Neuhouser, Lesley Tinker, Pamela A. Shaw, Dale Schoeller, Sheila A. Bingham, Linda Van Horn, Shirley A A Beresford, Bette Caan, Cynthia Thomson, Suzanne Satterfield, Lew Kuller, Gerardo Heiss, Ellen Smit, Gloria Sarto, Judith Ockene, Marcia L. Stefanick, Annlouise Assaf, Shirley Runswick, Ross L. Prentice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

204 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Underreporting of energy consumption by self-report is well-recognized, but previous studies using recovery biomarkers have not been sufficiently large to establish whether participant characteristics predict misreporting. In 2004-2005, 544 participants in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial completed a doubly labeled water protocol (energy biomarker), 24-hour urine collection (protein biomarker), and self-reports of diet (assessed by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)), exercise, and lifestyle habits; 111 women repeated all procedures after 6 months. Using linear regression, the authors estimated associations of participant characteristics with misreporting, defined as the extent to which the log ratio (self-reported FFQ/nutritional biomarker) was less than zero. Intervention women in the trial underreported energy intake by 32% (vs. 27% in the comparison arm) and protein intake by 15% (vs. 10%). Younger women had more underreporting of energy (p = 0.02) and protein (p = 0.001), while increasing body mass index predicted increased underreporting of energy and overreporting of percentage of energy derived from protein (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Blacks and Hispanics underreported more than did Caucasians. Correlations of initial measures with repeat measures (n = 111) were 0.72, 0.70, 0.46, and 0.64 for biomarker energy, FFQ energy, biomarker protein, and FFQ protein, respectively. Recovery biomarker data were used in regression equations to calibrate self-reports; the potential application of these equations to disease risk modeling is presented. The authors confirm the existence of systematic bias in dietary self-reports and provide methods of correcting for measurement error.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1247-1259
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume167
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

Women's Health
Self Report
Biomarkers
Food
Proteins
Diet Therapy
Urine Specimen Collection
Energy Intake
Hispanic Americans
Habits
Life Style
Linear Models
Body Mass Index
Exercise
Diet
Surveys and Questionnaires
Water

Keywords

  • Bias (epidemiology)
  • Biological markers
  • Diet
  • Energy intake
  • Epidemiologic methods
  • Measurement error
  • Nutrition assessment
  • Proteins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Neuhouser, M. L., Tinker, L., Shaw, P. A., Schoeller, D., Bingham, S. A., Horn, L. V., ... Prentice, R. L. (2008). Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167(10), 1247-1259. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn026

Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. / Neuhouser, Marian L.; Tinker, Lesley; Shaw, Pamela A.; Schoeller, Dale; Bingham, Sheila A.; Horn, Linda Van; Beresford, Shirley A A; Caan, Bette; Thomson, Cynthia; Satterfield, Suzanne; Kuller, Lew; Heiss, Gerardo; Smit, Ellen; Sarto, Gloria; Ockene, Judith; Stefanick, Marcia L.; Assaf, Annlouise; Runswick, Shirley; Prentice, Ross L.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 167, No. 10, 05.2008, p. 1247-1259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neuhouser, ML, Tinker, L, Shaw, PA, Schoeller, D, Bingham, SA, Horn, LV, Beresford, SAA, Caan, B, Thomson, C, Satterfield, S, Kuller, L, Heiss, G, Smit, E, Sarto, G, Ockene, J, Stefanick, ML, Assaf, A, Runswick, S & Prentice, RL 2008, 'Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 167, no. 10, pp. 1247-1259. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn026
Neuhouser, Marian L. ; Tinker, Lesley ; Shaw, Pamela A. ; Schoeller, Dale ; Bingham, Sheila A. ; Horn, Linda Van ; Beresford, Shirley A A ; Caan, Bette ; Thomson, Cynthia ; Satterfield, Suzanne ; Kuller, Lew ; Heiss, Gerardo ; Smit, Ellen ; Sarto, Gloria ; Ockene, Judith ; Stefanick, Marcia L. ; Assaf, Annlouise ; Runswick, Shirley ; Prentice, Ross L. / Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2008 ; Vol. 167, No. 10. pp. 1247-1259.
@article{773053050b1c4108848819acca4df67e,
title = "Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative",
abstract = "Underreporting of energy consumption by self-report is well-recognized, but previous studies using recovery biomarkers have not been sufficiently large to establish whether participant characteristics predict misreporting. In 2004-2005, 544 participants in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial completed a doubly labeled water protocol (energy biomarker), 24-hour urine collection (protein biomarker), and self-reports of diet (assessed by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)), exercise, and lifestyle habits; 111 women repeated all procedures after 6 months. Using linear regression, the authors estimated associations of participant characteristics with misreporting, defined as the extent to which the log ratio (self-reported FFQ/nutritional biomarker) was less than zero. Intervention women in the trial underreported energy intake by 32{\%} (vs. 27{\%} in the comparison arm) and protein intake by 15{\%} (vs. 10{\%}). Younger women had more underreporting of energy (p = 0.02) and protein (p = 0.001), while increasing body mass index predicted increased underreporting of energy and overreporting of percentage of energy derived from protein (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Blacks and Hispanics underreported more than did Caucasians. Correlations of initial measures with repeat measures (n = 111) were 0.72, 0.70, 0.46, and 0.64 for biomarker energy, FFQ energy, biomarker protein, and FFQ protein, respectively. Recovery biomarker data were used in regression equations to calibrate self-reports; the potential application of these equations to disease risk modeling is presented. The authors confirm the existence of systematic bias in dietary self-reports and provide methods of correcting for measurement error.",
keywords = "Bias (epidemiology), Biological markers, Diet, Energy intake, Epidemiologic methods, Measurement error, Nutrition assessment, Proteins",
author = "Neuhouser, {Marian L.} and Lesley Tinker and Shaw, {Pamela A.} and Dale Schoeller and Bingham, {Sheila A.} and Horn, {Linda Van} and Beresford, {Shirley A A} and Bette Caan and Cynthia Thomson and Suzanne Satterfield and Lew Kuller and Gerardo Heiss and Ellen Smit and Gloria Sarto and Judith Ockene and Stefanick, {Marcia L.} and Annlouise Assaf and Shirley Runswick and Prentice, {Ross L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwn026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "167",
pages = "1247--1259",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative

AU - Neuhouser, Marian L.

AU - Tinker, Lesley

AU - Shaw, Pamela A.

AU - Schoeller, Dale

AU - Bingham, Sheila A.

AU - Horn, Linda Van

AU - Beresford, Shirley A A

AU - Caan, Bette

AU - Thomson, Cynthia

AU - Satterfield, Suzanne

AU - Kuller, Lew

AU - Heiss, Gerardo

AU - Smit, Ellen

AU - Sarto, Gloria

AU - Ockene, Judith

AU - Stefanick, Marcia L.

AU - Assaf, Annlouise

AU - Runswick, Shirley

AU - Prentice, Ross L.

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Underreporting of energy consumption by self-report is well-recognized, but previous studies using recovery biomarkers have not been sufficiently large to establish whether participant characteristics predict misreporting. In 2004-2005, 544 participants in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial completed a doubly labeled water protocol (energy biomarker), 24-hour urine collection (protein biomarker), and self-reports of diet (assessed by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)), exercise, and lifestyle habits; 111 women repeated all procedures after 6 months. Using linear regression, the authors estimated associations of participant characteristics with misreporting, defined as the extent to which the log ratio (self-reported FFQ/nutritional biomarker) was less than zero. Intervention women in the trial underreported energy intake by 32% (vs. 27% in the comparison arm) and protein intake by 15% (vs. 10%). Younger women had more underreporting of energy (p = 0.02) and protein (p = 0.001), while increasing body mass index predicted increased underreporting of energy and overreporting of percentage of energy derived from protein (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Blacks and Hispanics underreported more than did Caucasians. Correlations of initial measures with repeat measures (n = 111) were 0.72, 0.70, 0.46, and 0.64 for biomarker energy, FFQ energy, biomarker protein, and FFQ protein, respectively. Recovery biomarker data were used in regression equations to calibrate self-reports; the potential application of these equations to disease risk modeling is presented. The authors confirm the existence of systematic bias in dietary self-reports and provide methods of correcting for measurement error.

AB - Underreporting of energy consumption by self-report is well-recognized, but previous studies using recovery biomarkers have not been sufficiently large to establish whether participant characteristics predict misreporting. In 2004-2005, 544 participants in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial completed a doubly labeled water protocol (energy biomarker), 24-hour urine collection (protein biomarker), and self-reports of diet (assessed by food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)), exercise, and lifestyle habits; 111 women repeated all procedures after 6 months. Using linear regression, the authors estimated associations of participant characteristics with misreporting, defined as the extent to which the log ratio (self-reported FFQ/nutritional biomarker) was less than zero. Intervention women in the trial underreported energy intake by 32% (vs. 27% in the comparison arm) and protein intake by 15% (vs. 10%). Younger women had more underreporting of energy (p = 0.02) and protein (p = 0.001), while increasing body mass index predicted increased underreporting of energy and overreporting of percentage of energy derived from protein (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Blacks and Hispanics underreported more than did Caucasians. Correlations of initial measures with repeat measures (n = 111) were 0.72, 0.70, 0.46, and 0.64 for biomarker energy, FFQ energy, biomarker protein, and FFQ protein, respectively. Recovery biomarker data were used in regression equations to calibrate self-reports; the potential application of these equations to disease risk modeling is presented. The authors confirm the existence of systematic bias in dietary self-reports and provide methods of correcting for measurement error.

KW - Bias (epidemiology)

KW - Biological markers

KW - Diet

KW - Energy intake

KW - Epidemiologic methods

KW - Measurement error

KW - Nutrition assessment

KW - Proteins

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43249118741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43249118741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwn026

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwn026

M3 - Article

VL - 167

SP - 1247

EP - 1259

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 10

ER -