Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program

Kristin M. Baker, Ron Z. Goetzel, Xiaofei Pei, Audrey J. Weiss, Jennie Bowen, Maryam J. Tabrizi, Craig F. Nelson, R. Douglas Metz, Kenneth R Pelletier, Elizabeth Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Certain modifiable risk factors lead to higher health care costs and reduced worker productivity. A predictive return-on-investment (ROI) model was applied to an obesity management intervention to demonstrate the use of econometric modeling in establishing financial justification for worksite health promotion. METHODS: Self-reported risk factors (n = 890) were analyzed using χ and t test methods. Changes in risk factors, demographics, and financial measures comprised the model inputs that determined medical and productivity savings. RESULTS: Over 1 year, 7 of 10 health risks decreased. Of total projected savings ($311,755), 59% were attributed to reduced health care expenditures ($184,582) and 41% resulted from productivity improvements ($127,173), a $1.17 to $1.00 ROI. CONCLUSIONS: Using an ROI model to project program savings is a practical way to provide financial justification for investment in worksite health promotion when risk reduction data are available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)981-990
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume50
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Health Promotion
Workplace
Obesity
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Expenditures
Health Care Costs
Demography
Delivery of Health Care
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program. / Baker, Kristin M.; Goetzel, Ron Z.; Pei, Xiaofei; Weiss, Audrey J.; Bowen, Jennie; Tabrizi, Maryam J.; Nelson, Craig F.; Metz, R. Douglas; Pelletier, Kenneth R; Thompson, Elizabeth.

In: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 9, 09.2008, p. 981-990.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baker, Kristin M. ; Goetzel, Ron Z. ; Pei, Xiaofei ; Weiss, Audrey J. ; Bowen, Jennie ; Tabrizi, Maryam J. ; Nelson, Craig F. ; Metz, R. Douglas ; Pelletier, Kenneth R ; Thompson, Elizabeth. / Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program. In: Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 50, No. 9. pp. 981-990.
@article{1f662d1f9ff14dbeb71de4050ab8fc36,
title = "Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Certain modifiable risk factors lead to higher health care costs and reduced worker productivity. A predictive return-on-investment (ROI) model was applied to an obesity management intervention to demonstrate the use of econometric modeling in establishing financial justification for worksite health promotion. METHODS: Self-reported risk factors (n = 890) were analyzed using χ and t test methods. Changes in risk factors, demographics, and financial measures comprised the model inputs that determined medical and productivity savings. RESULTS: Over 1 year, 7 of 10 health risks decreased. Of total projected savings ($311,755), 59{\%} were attributed to reduced health care expenditures ($184,582) and 41{\%} resulted from productivity improvements ($127,173), a $1.17 to $1.00 ROI. CONCLUSIONS: Using an ROI model to project program savings is a practical way to provide financial justification for investment in worksite health promotion when risk reduction data are available.",
author = "Baker, {Kristin M.} and Goetzel, {Ron Z.} and Xiaofei Pei and Weiss, {Audrey J.} and Jennie Bowen and Tabrizi, {Maryam J.} and Nelson, {Craig F.} and Metz, {R. Douglas} and Pelletier, {Kenneth R} and Elizabeth Thompson",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/JOM.0b013e318184a489",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "981--990",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a return-on-investment estimation model to evaluate outcomes from an obesity management worksite health promotion program

AU - Baker, Kristin M.

AU - Goetzel, Ron Z.

AU - Pei, Xiaofei

AU - Weiss, Audrey J.

AU - Bowen, Jennie

AU - Tabrizi, Maryam J.

AU - Nelson, Craig F.

AU - Metz, R. Douglas

AU - Pelletier, Kenneth R

AU - Thompson, Elizabeth

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Certain modifiable risk factors lead to higher health care costs and reduced worker productivity. A predictive return-on-investment (ROI) model was applied to an obesity management intervention to demonstrate the use of econometric modeling in establishing financial justification for worksite health promotion. METHODS: Self-reported risk factors (n = 890) were analyzed using χ and t test methods. Changes in risk factors, demographics, and financial measures comprised the model inputs that determined medical and productivity savings. RESULTS: Over 1 year, 7 of 10 health risks decreased. Of total projected savings ($311,755), 59% were attributed to reduced health care expenditures ($184,582) and 41% resulted from productivity improvements ($127,173), a $1.17 to $1.00 ROI. CONCLUSIONS: Using an ROI model to project program savings is a practical way to provide financial justification for investment in worksite health promotion when risk reduction data are available.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Certain modifiable risk factors lead to higher health care costs and reduced worker productivity. A predictive return-on-investment (ROI) model was applied to an obesity management intervention to demonstrate the use of econometric modeling in establishing financial justification for worksite health promotion. METHODS: Self-reported risk factors (n = 890) were analyzed using χ and t test methods. Changes in risk factors, demographics, and financial measures comprised the model inputs that determined medical and productivity savings. RESULTS: Over 1 year, 7 of 10 health risks decreased. Of total projected savings ($311,755), 59% were attributed to reduced health care expenditures ($184,582) and 41% resulted from productivity improvements ($127,173), a $1.17 to $1.00 ROI. CONCLUSIONS: Using an ROI model to project program savings is a practical way to provide financial justification for investment in worksite health promotion when risk reduction data are available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62649140997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62649140997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318184a489

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318184a489

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 981

EP - 990

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 9

ER -