Using chimeric immunity proteins to explore the energy landscape for α-helical protein folding

Neil Ferguson, Wei Li, Andrew P Capaldi, Colin Kleanthous, Sheena E. Radford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To address the role of sequence in the folding of homologous proteins, the folding and unfolding kinetics of the all-helical bacterial immunity proteins Im2 and Im9 were characterised, together with six chimeric derivatives of these proteins. We show that both Im2 and Im9 fold rapidly (kUNH2O ≈ 2000 s-1 at pH 7.0, 25°C) in apparent two-state transitions, through rate-limiting transition states that are highly compact (βTS 0.93 and 0.96, respectively). Whilst the folding and unfolding properties of three of the chimeras (Im2 (1-44)Im9, Im2 (1-64)Im9 and Im2 (25-44)Im9) are similar to their parental counterparts, in other chimeric proteins the introduced sequence variation results in altered kinetic behaviour. At low urea concentrations, Im2 (1-29)Im9 and Im2 (56-64)Im9 fold in two-state transitions via transition states that are significantly less compact (βTS ≈ 0.7) than those characterised for the other immunity proteins presented here. At higher urea concentrations, however, the rate-limiting transition state for these two chimeras switches or moves to a more compact species (βTS ≈ 0.9). Surprisingly, Im2 (30-64)Im9 populates a highly collapsed species (βI = 0.87) in the dead-time (2.5 ms) of stopped flow measurements. These data indicate that whilst topology may place significant constraints on the folding process, specific inter-residue interactions, revealed here through multiple sequence changes, can modulate the ruggedness of the folding energy landscape.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-405
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
Volume307
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 16 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Protein Folding
Immunity
Urea
Protein Unfolding
Proteins
Bacterial Proteins

Keywords

  • Chimera
  • Intermediate
  • Sequence
  • Topology
  • Transition state

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Virology

Cite this

Using chimeric immunity proteins to explore the energy landscape for α-helical protein folding. / Ferguson, Neil; Li, Wei; Capaldi, Andrew P; Kleanthous, Colin; Radford, Sheena E.

In: Journal of Molecular Biology, Vol. 307, No. 1, 16.03.2001, p. 393-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferguson, Neil ; Li, Wei ; Capaldi, Andrew P ; Kleanthous, Colin ; Radford, Sheena E. / Using chimeric immunity proteins to explore the energy landscape for α-helical protein folding. In: Journal of Molecular Biology. 2001 ; Vol. 307, No. 1. pp. 393-405.
@article{e363a1d0e06746c18dc01cf33b06f79c,
title = "Using chimeric immunity proteins to explore the energy landscape for α-helical protein folding",
abstract = "To address the role of sequence in the folding of homologous proteins, the folding and unfolding kinetics of the all-helical bacterial immunity proteins Im2 and Im9 were characterised, together with six chimeric derivatives of these proteins. We show that both Im2 and Im9 fold rapidly (kUNH2O ≈ 2000 s-1 at pH 7.0, 25°C) in apparent two-state transitions, through rate-limiting transition states that are highly compact (βTS 0.93 and 0.96, respectively). Whilst the folding and unfolding properties of three of the chimeras (Im2 (1-44)Im9, Im2 (1-64)Im9 and Im2 (25-44)Im9) are similar to their parental counterparts, in other chimeric proteins the introduced sequence variation results in altered kinetic behaviour. At low urea concentrations, Im2 (1-29)Im9 and Im2 (56-64)Im9 fold in two-state transitions via transition states that are significantly less compact (βTS ≈ 0.7) than those characterised for the other immunity proteins presented here. At higher urea concentrations, however, the rate-limiting transition state for these two chimeras switches or moves to a more compact species (βTS ≈ 0.9). Surprisingly, Im2 (30-64)Im9 populates a highly collapsed species (βI = 0.87) in the dead-time (2.5 ms) of stopped flow measurements. These data indicate that whilst topology may place significant constraints on the folding process, specific inter-residue interactions, revealed here through multiple sequence changes, can modulate the ruggedness of the folding energy landscape.",
keywords = "Chimera, Intermediate, Sequence, Topology, Transition state",
author = "Neil Ferguson and Wei Li and Capaldi, {Andrew P} and Colin Kleanthous and Radford, {Sheena E.}",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1006/jmbi.2000.4492",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "307",
pages = "393--405",
journal = "Journal of Molecular Biology",
issn = "0022-2836",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using chimeric immunity proteins to explore the energy landscape for α-helical protein folding

AU - Ferguson, Neil

AU - Li, Wei

AU - Capaldi, Andrew P

AU - Kleanthous, Colin

AU - Radford, Sheena E.

PY - 2001/3/16

Y1 - 2001/3/16

N2 - To address the role of sequence in the folding of homologous proteins, the folding and unfolding kinetics of the all-helical bacterial immunity proteins Im2 and Im9 were characterised, together with six chimeric derivatives of these proteins. We show that both Im2 and Im9 fold rapidly (kUNH2O ≈ 2000 s-1 at pH 7.0, 25°C) in apparent two-state transitions, through rate-limiting transition states that are highly compact (βTS 0.93 and 0.96, respectively). Whilst the folding and unfolding properties of three of the chimeras (Im2 (1-44)Im9, Im2 (1-64)Im9 and Im2 (25-44)Im9) are similar to their parental counterparts, in other chimeric proteins the introduced sequence variation results in altered kinetic behaviour. At low urea concentrations, Im2 (1-29)Im9 and Im2 (56-64)Im9 fold in two-state transitions via transition states that are significantly less compact (βTS ≈ 0.7) than those characterised for the other immunity proteins presented here. At higher urea concentrations, however, the rate-limiting transition state for these two chimeras switches or moves to a more compact species (βTS ≈ 0.9). Surprisingly, Im2 (30-64)Im9 populates a highly collapsed species (βI = 0.87) in the dead-time (2.5 ms) of stopped flow measurements. These data indicate that whilst topology may place significant constraints on the folding process, specific inter-residue interactions, revealed here through multiple sequence changes, can modulate the ruggedness of the folding energy landscape.

AB - To address the role of sequence in the folding of homologous proteins, the folding and unfolding kinetics of the all-helical bacterial immunity proteins Im2 and Im9 were characterised, together with six chimeric derivatives of these proteins. We show that both Im2 and Im9 fold rapidly (kUNH2O ≈ 2000 s-1 at pH 7.0, 25°C) in apparent two-state transitions, through rate-limiting transition states that are highly compact (βTS 0.93 and 0.96, respectively). Whilst the folding and unfolding properties of three of the chimeras (Im2 (1-44)Im9, Im2 (1-64)Im9 and Im2 (25-44)Im9) are similar to their parental counterparts, in other chimeric proteins the introduced sequence variation results in altered kinetic behaviour. At low urea concentrations, Im2 (1-29)Im9 and Im2 (56-64)Im9 fold in two-state transitions via transition states that are significantly less compact (βTS ≈ 0.7) than those characterised for the other immunity proteins presented here. At higher urea concentrations, however, the rate-limiting transition state for these two chimeras switches or moves to a more compact species (βTS ≈ 0.9). Surprisingly, Im2 (30-64)Im9 populates a highly collapsed species (βI = 0.87) in the dead-time (2.5 ms) of stopped flow measurements. These data indicate that whilst topology may place significant constraints on the folding process, specific inter-residue interactions, revealed here through multiple sequence changes, can modulate the ruggedness of the folding energy landscape.

KW - Chimera

KW - Intermediate

KW - Sequence

KW - Topology

KW - Transition state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035896036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035896036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4492

DO - 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4492

M3 - Article

C2 - 11243827

AN - SCOPUS:0035896036

VL - 307

SP - 393

EP - 405

JO - Journal of Molecular Biology

JF - Journal of Molecular Biology

SN - 0022-2836

IS - 1

ER -