Using Cross-Modal Lexical Decision Tasks to Investigate Sentence Processing

Janet L Nicol, Janet Dean Fodor, David Swinney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent investigations of sentence processing have used the cross-modal lexical decision task to show that the antecedent of a phonologically empty noun phrase (specifically, WH-trace) is reactivated at the trace position. G. McKoon, R. Ratcliff, and G. Ward (1994) claimed that (a) a design feature concerning the choice of related and unrelated targets is a possible confound in this work and (b) the conclusions drawn from this previous research are therefore called into question. These claims are considered in light of both McKoon et al.'s experimental findings and results of our own experiments in which we test their linguistic materials. We argue that their results may be due to the nature of their materials. Additionally, we argue that a follow-up experiment reported by G. McKoon and R. Ratcliff (1994) used a technique that is not comparable to the cross-modal lexical decision task. It is concluded that current evidence supports the claim that structural information is used during on-line sentence processing and that the cross-modal technique is sensitive to this.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1229-1238
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume20
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1994

Fingerprint

Linguistics
experiment
Research
linguistics
evidence
Sentence Processing
Lexical Decision Task
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Using Cross-Modal Lexical Decision Tasks to Investigate Sentence Processing. / Nicol, Janet L; Fodor, Janet Dean; Swinney, David.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 5, 09.1994, p. 1229-1238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8fa0b66c511845c6bc850a3b05d7d4f1,
title = "Using Cross-Modal Lexical Decision Tasks to Investigate Sentence Processing",
abstract = "Recent investigations of sentence processing have used the cross-modal lexical decision task to show that the antecedent of a phonologically empty noun phrase (specifically, WH-trace) is reactivated at the trace position. G. McKoon, R. Ratcliff, and G. Ward (1994) claimed that (a) a design feature concerning the choice of related and unrelated targets is a possible confound in this work and (b) the conclusions drawn from this previous research are therefore called into question. These claims are considered in light of both McKoon et al.'s experimental findings and results of our own experiments in which we test their linguistic materials. We argue that their results may be due to the nature of their materials. Additionally, we argue that a follow-up experiment reported by G. McKoon and R. Ratcliff (1994) used a technique that is not comparable to the cross-modal lexical decision task. It is concluded that current evidence supports the claim that structural information is used during on-line sentence processing and that the cross-modal technique is sensitive to this.",
author = "Nicol, {Janet L} and Fodor, {Janet Dean} and David Swinney",
year = "1994",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1229--1238",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Cross-Modal Lexical Decision Tasks to Investigate Sentence Processing

AU - Nicol, Janet L

AU - Fodor, Janet Dean

AU - Swinney, David

PY - 1994/9

Y1 - 1994/9

N2 - Recent investigations of sentence processing have used the cross-modal lexical decision task to show that the antecedent of a phonologically empty noun phrase (specifically, WH-trace) is reactivated at the trace position. G. McKoon, R. Ratcliff, and G. Ward (1994) claimed that (a) a design feature concerning the choice of related and unrelated targets is a possible confound in this work and (b) the conclusions drawn from this previous research are therefore called into question. These claims are considered in light of both McKoon et al.'s experimental findings and results of our own experiments in which we test their linguistic materials. We argue that their results may be due to the nature of their materials. Additionally, we argue that a follow-up experiment reported by G. McKoon and R. Ratcliff (1994) used a technique that is not comparable to the cross-modal lexical decision task. It is concluded that current evidence supports the claim that structural information is used during on-line sentence processing and that the cross-modal technique is sensitive to this.

AB - Recent investigations of sentence processing have used the cross-modal lexical decision task to show that the antecedent of a phonologically empty noun phrase (specifically, WH-trace) is reactivated at the trace position. G. McKoon, R. Ratcliff, and G. Ward (1994) claimed that (a) a design feature concerning the choice of related and unrelated targets is a possible confound in this work and (b) the conclusions drawn from this previous research are therefore called into question. These claims are considered in light of both McKoon et al.'s experimental findings and results of our own experiments in which we test their linguistic materials. We argue that their results may be due to the nature of their materials. Additionally, we argue that a follow-up experiment reported by G. McKoon and R. Ratcliff (1994) used a technique that is not comparable to the cross-modal lexical decision task. It is concluded that current evidence supports the claim that structural information is used during on-line sentence processing and that the cross-modal technique is sensitive to this.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028504624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028504624&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1229

EP - 1238

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 5

ER -