Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development

Mary Alt, Christina Meyers, Paul M. Alt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The authors explored a novel technique with potential for assessing conceptual development. Participants rated how "normal" to "really weird" an image was in order to determine whether (a) participants would rate images by amount of variation (slight/significant) from the standard image, (b) participants would treat variation related to different concepts equally, or (c) there would be developmental differences in these ratings. Then, authors asked whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) would demonstrate weaker conceptual skills based on their ratings. Method: Adults and school-age children (with and without SLI) used a 9-point equal-appearing interval scale to rate photographic images of animals. These included standard images and images that altered the animals' shape, pattern, color, and facial morphometry. Results: Significant differences in ratings were obtained for adults compared with typically developing children and children with SLI compared with their age-matched peers. This is in line with the expectation that adults have stronger representations than children, as do typical children compared with those with SLI. Participants differentially rated images that varied from the standard image (slight/significant) for all parameters except shape. Conclusion: Probing conceptual representations without the need for verbal response has the potential for exploring conceptual deficits in SLI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1650-1661
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume56
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

rating
Language
language
animal
Rating
Conceptual Development
Color
deficit
Specific Language Impairment
school
Animals

Keywords

  • Conceptual
  • Ratings
  • Semantic
  • Specific language impairment
  • Typicality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development. / Alt, Mary; Meyers, Christina; Alt, Paul M.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 56, No. 5, 01.10.2013, p. 1650-1661.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alt, Mary ; Meyers, Christina ; Alt, Paul M. / Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development. In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2013 ; Vol. 56, No. 5. pp. 1650-1661.
@article{5a2e1ca55ee64df3b7b572bd3d2bda58,
title = "Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development",
abstract = "Purpose: The authors explored a novel technique with potential for assessing conceptual development. Participants rated how {"}normal{"} to {"}really weird{"} an image was in order to determine whether (a) participants would rate images by amount of variation (slight/significant) from the standard image, (b) participants would treat variation related to different concepts equally, or (c) there would be developmental differences in these ratings. Then, authors asked whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) would demonstrate weaker conceptual skills based on their ratings. Method: Adults and school-age children (with and without SLI) used a 9-point equal-appearing interval scale to rate photographic images of animals. These included standard images and images that altered the animals' shape, pattern, color, and facial morphometry. Results: Significant differences in ratings were obtained for adults compared with typically developing children and children with SLI compared with their age-matched peers. This is in line with the expectation that adults have stronger representations than children, as do typical children compared with those with SLI. Participants differentially rated images that varied from the standard image (slight/significant) for all parameters except shape. Conclusion: Probing conceptual representations without the need for verbal response has the potential for exploring conceptual deficits in SLI.",
keywords = "Conceptual, Ratings, Semantic, Specific language impairment, Typicality",
author = "Mary Alt and Christina Meyers and Alt, {Paul M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/1092-4388(2013/11-0317)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "1650--1661",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development

AU - Alt, Mary

AU - Meyers, Christina

AU - Alt, Paul M.

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - Purpose: The authors explored a novel technique with potential for assessing conceptual development. Participants rated how "normal" to "really weird" an image was in order to determine whether (a) participants would rate images by amount of variation (slight/significant) from the standard image, (b) participants would treat variation related to different concepts equally, or (c) there would be developmental differences in these ratings. Then, authors asked whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) would demonstrate weaker conceptual skills based on their ratings. Method: Adults and school-age children (with and without SLI) used a 9-point equal-appearing interval scale to rate photographic images of animals. These included standard images and images that altered the animals' shape, pattern, color, and facial morphometry. Results: Significant differences in ratings were obtained for adults compared with typically developing children and children with SLI compared with their age-matched peers. This is in line with the expectation that adults have stronger representations than children, as do typical children compared with those with SLI. Participants differentially rated images that varied from the standard image (slight/significant) for all parameters except shape. Conclusion: Probing conceptual representations without the need for verbal response has the potential for exploring conceptual deficits in SLI.

AB - Purpose: The authors explored a novel technique with potential for assessing conceptual development. Participants rated how "normal" to "really weird" an image was in order to determine whether (a) participants would rate images by amount of variation (slight/significant) from the standard image, (b) participants would treat variation related to different concepts equally, or (c) there would be developmental differences in these ratings. Then, authors asked whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) would demonstrate weaker conceptual skills based on their ratings. Method: Adults and school-age children (with and without SLI) used a 9-point equal-appearing interval scale to rate photographic images of animals. These included standard images and images that altered the animals' shape, pattern, color, and facial morphometry. Results: Significant differences in ratings were obtained for adults compared with typically developing children and children with SLI compared with their age-matched peers. This is in line with the expectation that adults have stronger representations than children, as do typical children compared with those with SLI. Participants differentially rated images that varied from the standard image (slight/significant) for all parameters except shape. Conclusion: Probing conceptual representations without the need for verbal response has the potential for exploring conceptual deficits in SLI.

KW - Conceptual

KW - Ratings

KW - Semantic

KW - Specific language impairment

KW - Typicality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886652893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886652893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/11-0317)

DO - 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/11-0317)

M3 - Article

C2 - 23838987

AN - SCOPUS:84886652893

VL - 56

SP - 1650

EP - 1661

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 5

ER -