Utility of bedside sonography to distinguish soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions in the emergency department

Srikar R Adhikari, Michael Blaivas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of bedside sonography to differentiate soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with joint pain, erythema, and swelling who received bedside sonography. The ED sonographic examinations were performed by emergency physician sonologists who were not involved in clinical assessment and management of these patients. The treating physician's opinions regarding the probability of joint effusion and need for aspiration were documented in the sonography log before the sonographic examination was performed. The bedside sonograms of all patients included in this study were also reviewed for accuracy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results. A total of 54 patients (mean age ± SD, 41 ± 18.9 years) were identified over a 1-year period. The symptomatic joints in our study subjects were as follows: knee, 24 of 54 (44%); elbow, 21 of 54 (38%); ankle, 8 of 54 (15%); and metatarsophalangeal joint, 1 of 54 (2%). Twenty-two of 54 patients (40.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.6%-53.8%) were found to have joint effusions on sonography. Sonography altered management in 35 of 54 patients (65%; 95% CI, 52%-77.5%). Joint aspiration was planned in 39 of 54 cases (72.2%; 95% CI, 60.2%-84.1%) before sonography. After sonography, only 20 of these patients (37%; 95% CI, 24.1%-49.9%) underwent joint aspiration. There was a statistically significant difference in treatment plans after the addition of bedside sonographic results (P < .01). Conclusions. Our study suggests that bedside sonography is useful in differentiating joint effusions from soft tissue abnormalities and directing appropriate therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-526
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume29
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Ultrasonography
Joints
Confidence Intervals
Metatarsophalangeal Joint
Physicians
Arthralgia
Erythema
Elbow
Ankle
Knee
Emergencies
Therapeutics
Aspirations (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Emergency sonography
  • Joint cellulitis
  • Joint effusion
  • Joint swelling
  • Musculoskeletal sonography
  • Point-of-care sonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Utility of bedside sonography to distinguish soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions in the emergency department. / Adhikari, Srikar R; Blaivas, Michael.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 519-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1d2d8cf8fc04e44a79ad243e4bb08e1,
title = "Utility of bedside sonography to distinguish soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions in the emergency department",
abstract = "Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of bedside sonography to differentiate soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with joint pain, erythema, and swelling who received bedside sonography. The ED sonographic examinations were performed by emergency physician sonologists who were not involved in clinical assessment and management of these patients. The treating physician's opinions regarding the probability of joint effusion and need for aspiration were documented in the sonography log before the sonographic examination was performed. The bedside sonograms of all patients included in this study were also reviewed for accuracy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results. A total of 54 patients (mean age ± SD, 41 ± 18.9 years) were identified over a 1-year period. The symptomatic joints in our study subjects were as follows: knee, 24 of 54 (44{\%}); elbow, 21 of 54 (38{\%}); ankle, 8 of 54 (15{\%}); and metatarsophalangeal joint, 1 of 54 (2{\%}). Twenty-two of 54 patients (40.7{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 27.6{\%}-53.8{\%}) were found to have joint effusions on sonography. Sonography altered management in 35 of 54 patients (65{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 52{\%}-77.5{\%}). Joint aspiration was planned in 39 of 54 cases (72.2{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 60.2{\%}-84.1{\%}) before sonography. After sonography, only 20 of these patients (37{\%}; 95{\%} CI, 24.1{\%}-49.9{\%}) underwent joint aspiration. There was a statistically significant difference in treatment plans after the addition of bedside sonographic results (P < .01). Conclusions. Our study suggests that bedside sonography is useful in differentiating joint effusions from soft tissue abnormalities and directing appropriate therapy.",
keywords = "Emergency sonography, Joint cellulitis, Joint effusion, Joint swelling, Musculoskeletal sonography, Point-of-care sonography",
author = "Adhikari, {Srikar R} and Michael Blaivas",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "519--526",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of bedside sonography to distinguish soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions in the emergency department

AU - Adhikari, Srikar R

AU - Blaivas, Michael

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of bedside sonography to differentiate soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with joint pain, erythema, and swelling who received bedside sonography. The ED sonographic examinations were performed by emergency physician sonologists who were not involved in clinical assessment and management of these patients. The treating physician's opinions regarding the probability of joint effusion and need for aspiration were documented in the sonography log before the sonographic examination was performed. The bedside sonograms of all patients included in this study were also reviewed for accuracy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results. A total of 54 patients (mean age ± SD, 41 ± 18.9 years) were identified over a 1-year period. The symptomatic joints in our study subjects were as follows: knee, 24 of 54 (44%); elbow, 21 of 54 (38%); ankle, 8 of 54 (15%); and metatarsophalangeal joint, 1 of 54 (2%). Twenty-two of 54 patients (40.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.6%-53.8%) were found to have joint effusions on sonography. Sonography altered management in 35 of 54 patients (65%; 95% CI, 52%-77.5%). Joint aspiration was planned in 39 of 54 cases (72.2%; 95% CI, 60.2%-84.1%) before sonography. After sonography, only 20 of these patients (37%; 95% CI, 24.1%-49.9%) underwent joint aspiration. There was a statistically significant difference in treatment plans after the addition of bedside sonographic results (P < .01). Conclusions. Our study suggests that bedside sonography is useful in differentiating joint effusions from soft tissue abnormalities and directing appropriate therapy.

AB - Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of bedside sonography to differentiate soft tissue abnormalities from joint effusions. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with joint pain, erythema, and swelling who received bedside sonography. The ED sonographic examinations were performed by emergency physician sonologists who were not involved in clinical assessment and management of these patients. The treating physician's opinions regarding the probability of joint effusion and need for aspiration were documented in the sonography log before the sonographic examination was performed. The bedside sonograms of all patients included in this study were also reviewed for accuracy. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results. A total of 54 patients (mean age ± SD, 41 ± 18.9 years) were identified over a 1-year period. The symptomatic joints in our study subjects were as follows: knee, 24 of 54 (44%); elbow, 21 of 54 (38%); ankle, 8 of 54 (15%); and metatarsophalangeal joint, 1 of 54 (2%). Twenty-two of 54 patients (40.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.6%-53.8%) were found to have joint effusions on sonography. Sonography altered management in 35 of 54 patients (65%; 95% CI, 52%-77.5%). Joint aspiration was planned in 39 of 54 cases (72.2%; 95% CI, 60.2%-84.1%) before sonography. After sonography, only 20 of these patients (37%; 95% CI, 24.1%-49.9%) underwent joint aspiration. There was a statistically significant difference in treatment plans after the addition of bedside sonographic results (P < .01). Conclusions. Our study suggests that bedside sonography is useful in differentiating joint effusions from soft tissue abnormalities and directing appropriate therapy.

KW - Emergency sonography

KW - Joint cellulitis

KW - Joint effusion

KW - Joint swelling

KW - Musculoskeletal sonography

KW - Point-of-care sonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951479333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951479333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 519

EP - 526

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 4

ER -