Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks

Timothy M. Kowalewski, Robert Sweet, Thomas S. Lendvay, Ashleigh Menhadji, Timothy Averch, Geoffrey Box, Timothy Brand, Michael Ferrandino, Jihad Kaouk, Bodo Knudsen, Jaime Landman, Benjamin Lee, Bradley F. Schwartz, Elspeth McDougall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose Standardized assessment of laparoscopic skill in urology is lacking. We investigated whether the AUA (American Urological Association) BLUS (Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Skills) skill tasks are valid to address this need. Materials and Methods This institutional review board approved study included 27 medical students, 42 urology residents, 18 fellows and 37 faculty urologists across 8 sites. Using the EDGE (Electronic Data Generation and Evaluation) device (Simulab, Seattle, Washington) 454 recordings were collected on peg transfer, pattern cutting, suturing and clip applying tasks, which together comprise the expert determined BLUS tasks. We collected synchronized video and tool motion data for each trial. For each task errors, time, path length, economy of motion, peak grasp force and EDGE score were collected. An expert panel of 5 faculty members performed GOALS (Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills) evaluations on a representative subset of peg transfer and suturing skill tasks performed by 24 participants (IRR = 0.95). Results Demographically derived skill levels proved unsuitable to evaluate construct validity. Separation of mean scores by grouped skill levels was strongest for the suturing task. Objective motion metrics and errors supported construct validity vis-à-vis correlation with blinded expert video ratings (motion metrics R2 = 0.95, p <0.01). Expert scores appeared to reward errors in suturing but not in block transfer. Conclusions BLUS skill task performance scoring can discriminate among basic laparoscopic technical skill levels. Self-reported demographics are an unreliable source of determining laparoscopic technical skill.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)998-1005
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume195
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • clinical competence
  • education
  • laparoscopy/standards
  • medical
  • urologic surgical procedures/education
  • validation studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kowalewski, T. M., Sweet, R., Lendvay, T. S., Menhadji, A., Averch, T., Box, G., Brand, T., Ferrandino, M., Kaouk, J., Knudsen, B., Landman, J., Lee, B., Schwartz, B. F., & McDougall, E. (2016). Validation of the AUA BLUS Tasks. Journal of Urology, 195(4), 998-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.087