Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)874-877
Number of pages4
JournalChest
Volume88
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Respiratory Function Tests
Health Surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests. / Harber, Philip I.

In: Chest, Vol. 88, No. 6, 1985, p. 874-877.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4a737c0b5b4f468fa1f857ad73c3a030,
title = "Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests",
abstract = "Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.",
author = "Harber, {Philip I}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "874--877",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests

AU - Harber, Philip I

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.

AB - Two contrasting errors in spirometric interpretation are the inappropriate conclusion of 'normality' (type I) and of 'abnormality' (type II). A survey of 67 health professionals showed major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion about the optimal relative proportions of type I and type II errors. This suggests the need for caution in the commonly employed practice of interpretation based on a 5 percent false positive rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022414433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022414433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 874

EP - 877

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -