Valuing amenity resources under uncertainty

Does the existence of fair contingent claims markets matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Alternative welfare measures are evaluated as measures of the value of change in access conditions for environmental resources, and it is shown that traditional Hicksian surplus estimates systematically underestimate benefits. It is further argued that the existence of fair contingent claims markets is a peripheral consideration in benefit estimation, that state-dependent payments present no significant collection obstacles not already encountered in state-independent payment schemes, and that risk-neutral social decision making requires state-dependent benefit measures for situations involving individual risk. These findings imply that future research should focus on developing theoretical bounds between the expected value of state-dependent benefit measures and conventional measures, and that contingent valuations techniques need to be extended to measure contingent payment possibilities for changes in uncertain access conditions to environmental resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-155
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

amenity
market
contingent valuation
resource
decision making
Amenities
Uncertainty
Resources
Contingent claims
Payment
surplus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{db8317cc992a490ebd2181eb1c9fa078,
title = "Valuing amenity resources under uncertainty: Does the existence of fair contingent claims markets matter?",
abstract = "Alternative welfare measures are evaluated as measures of the value of change in access conditions for environmental resources, and it is shown that traditional Hicksian surplus estimates systematically underestimate benefits. It is further argued that the existence of fair contingent claims markets is a peripheral consideration in benefit estimation, that state-dependent payments present no significant collection obstacles not already encountered in state-independent payment schemes, and that risk-neutral social decision making requires state-dependent benefit measures for situations involving individual risk. These findings imply that future research should focus on developing theoretical bounds between the expected value of state-dependent benefit measures and conventional measures, and that contingent valuations techniques need to be extended to measure contingent payment possibilities for changes in uncertain access conditions to environmental resources.",
author = "Colby, {Bonnie G} and Cory, {Dennis C}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1016/0095-0696(89)90005-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "149--155",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management",
issn = "0095-0696",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing amenity resources under uncertainty

T2 - Does the existence of fair contingent claims markets matter?

AU - Colby, Bonnie G

AU - Cory, Dennis C

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Alternative welfare measures are evaluated as measures of the value of change in access conditions for environmental resources, and it is shown that traditional Hicksian surplus estimates systematically underestimate benefits. It is further argued that the existence of fair contingent claims markets is a peripheral consideration in benefit estimation, that state-dependent payments present no significant collection obstacles not already encountered in state-independent payment schemes, and that risk-neutral social decision making requires state-dependent benefit measures for situations involving individual risk. These findings imply that future research should focus on developing theoretical bounds between the expected value of state-dependent benefit measures and conventional measures, and that contingent valuations techniques need to be extended to measure contingent payment possibilities for changes in uncertain access conditions to environmental resources.

AB - Alternative welfare measures are evaluated as measures of the value of change in access conditions for environmental resources, and it is shown that traditional Hicksian surplus estimates systematically underestimate benefits. It is further argued that the existence of fair contingent claims markets is a peripheral consideration in benefit estimation, that state-dependent payments present no significant collection obstacles not already encountered in state-independent payment schemes, and that risk-neutral social decision making requires state-dependent benefit measures for situations involving individual risk. These findings imply that future research should focus on developing theoretical bounds between the expected value of state-dependent benefit measures and conventional measures, and that contingent valuations techniques need to be extended to measure contingent payment possibilities for changes in uncertain access conditions to environmental resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249023063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249023063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90005-3

DO - 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90005-3

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 149

EP - 155

JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

SN - 0095-0696

IS - 2

ER -