Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade

P. Stiffel, Stuart R Hameroff, C. D. Blitt, R. C. Cork

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study of 15 patients shows that, using the train-of-four technique, assessment of neuromuscular blockade with d-tubocurarine and succinylcholine varies depending on the site and type of twitch-monitoring electrodes. Compared with standard ulnar needle electrodes, ulnar surface electrodes tend to overestimate, and periorbital surface electrodes to underestimate, the neuromuscular block. Knowledge of the relative sensitivities of these three methods may foster accurate monitoring of neuromuscular blockade, regardless of the method employed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-437
Number of pages2
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume52
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Neuromuscular Blockade
Electrodes
Neuromuscular Monitoring
Tubocurarine
Succinylcholine
Needles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Stiffel, P., Hameroff, S. R., Blitt, C. D., & Cork, R. C. (1980). Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology, 52(5), 436-437.

Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade. / Stiffel, P.; Hameroff, Stuart R; Blitt, C. D.; Cork, R. C.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 52, No. 5, 1980, p. 436-437.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stiffel, P, Hameroff, SR, Blitt, CD & Cork, RC 1980, 'Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade', Anesthesiology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 436-437.
Stiffel P, Hameroff SR, Blitt CD, Cork RC. Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 1980;52(5):436-437.
Stiffel, P. ; Hameroff, Stuart R ; Blitt, C. D. ; Cork, R. C. / Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade. In: Anesthesiology. 1980 ; Vol. 52, No. 5. pp. 436-437.
@article{70b5bf2230b34ca88437c3be2a10869c,
title = "Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade",
abstract = "This study of 15 patients shows that, using the train-of-four technique, assessment of neuromuscular blockade with d-tubocurarine and succinylcholine varies depending on the site and type of twitch-monitoring electrodes. Compared with standard ulnar needle electrodes, ulnar surface electrodes tend to overestimate, and periorbital surface electrodes to underestimate, the neuromuscular block. Knowledge of the relative sensitivities of these three methods may foster accurate monitoring of neuromuscular blockade, regardless of the method employed.",
author = "P. Stiffel and Hameroff, {Stuart R} and Blitt, {C. D.} and Cork, {R. C.}",
year = "1980",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "436--437",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability in assessment of neuromuscular blockade

AU - Stiffel, P.

AU - Hameroff, Stuart R

AU - Blitt, C. D.

AU - Cork, R. C.

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - This study of 15 patients shows that, using the train-of-four technique, assessment of neuromuscular blockade with d-tubocurarine and succinylcholine varies depending on the site and type of twitch-monitoring electrodes. Compared with standard ulnar needle electrodes, ulnar surface electrodes tend to overestimate, and periorbital surface electrodes to underestimate, the neuromuscular block. Knowledge of the relative sensitivities of these three methods may foster accurate monitoring of neuromuscular blockade, regardless of the method employed.

AB - This study of 15 patients shows that, using the train-of-four technique, assessment of neuromuscular blockade with d-tubocurarine and succinylcholine varies depending on the site and type of twitch-monitoring electrodes. Compared with standard ulnar needle electrodes, ulnar surface electrodes tend to overestimate, and periorbital surface electrodes to underestimate, the neuromuscular block. Knowledge of the relative sensitivities of these three methods may foster accurate monitoring of neuromuscular blockade, regardless of the method employed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018867168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018867168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7377578

AN - SCOPUS:0018867168

VL - 52

SP - 436

EP - 437

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 5

ER -