Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates

Isaac C. Ramos, Rosane Correa, Frederico P. Guerra, William Trattler, Michael W Belin, Stephen D. Klyce, Bruno M. Fontes, Paulo Schor, Michael K. Smolek, Daniel G. Dawson, Maria Regina Chalita, Jorge O. Cazal, Milton Ruiz, J. Bradley Randleman, Renato Ambrósio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the variability of subjective corneal topography map classification between different experienced examiners and the impact of changing from an absolute to a normative scale on the classifications. METHODS: Preoperative axial curvature maps using Scheimpflug imaging obtained with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) and clinical parameters were sent to 11 corneal topography specialists for subjective classification according to the Ectasia Risk Scoring System. The study population included two groups: 11 eyes that developed ectasia after LASIK and 14 eyes that had successful and stable LASIK outcomes. Each case was first reviewed using the absolute scale masked to the patient group. After 3 months, the same cases were represented using a normative scale and reviewed again by the same examiners for new classifications masked to the patient group. RESULTS: Using the absolute scale, 17 of 25 (68%) cases had variations on the classifications from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 60%. Using the normative scale, the classifications from 11 of 25 (44%) cases varied from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 61%. Eight examiners (73%) reported statistically higher scores (P < .05) when using the normative scale. Considering all 550 topographic analyses (25 cases, 11 examiners, and two scales), the same classification from the two scales was reported for 121 case pairs (44%). CONCLUSION: There was significant inter-observer variability in the subjective classifications using the same scale, and significant intra-observer variability between scales. Changing from an absolute to a normative scale increased the scores on the classifications by the same examiner, but significant inter-observer variability in the subjective interpretation of the maps still persisted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)770-775
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Refractive Surgery
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Corneal Topography
Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Observer Variation
Pathologic Dilatations
Germany

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates. / Ramos, Isaac C.; Correa, Rosane; Guerra, Frederico P.; Trattler, William; Belin, Michael W; Klyce, Stephen D.; Fontes, Bruno M.; Schor, Paulo; Smolek, Michael K.; Dawson, Daniel G.; Chalita, Maria Regina; Cazal, Jorge O.; Ruiz, Milton; Randleman, J. Bradley; Ambrósio, Renato.

In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 11, 2013, p. 770-775.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramos, IC, Correa, R, Guerra, FP, Trattler, W, Belin, MW, Klyce, SD, Fontes, BM, Schor, P, Smolek, MK, Dawson, DG, Chalita, MR, Cazal, JO, Ruiz, M, Randleman, JB & Ambrósio, R 2013, 'Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates', Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 770-775. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130823-01
Ramos, Isaac C. ; Correa, Rosane ; Guerra, Frederico P. ; Trattler, William ; Belin, Michael W ; Klyce, Stephen D. ; Fontes, Bruno M. ; Schor, Paulo ; Smolek, Michael K. ; Dawson, Daniel G. ; Chalita, Maria Regina ; Cazal, Jorge O. ; Ruiz, Milton ; Randleman, J. Bradley ; Ambrósio, Renato. / Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 11. pp. 770-775.
@article{4b772a8fb46c46b0bff8e66456230fcb,
title = "Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate the variability of subjective corneal topography map classification between different experienced examiners and the impact of changing from an absolute to a normative scale on the classifications. METHODS: Preoperative axial curvature maps using Scheimpflug imaging obtained with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikger{\"a}te, Wetzlar, Germany) and clinical parameters were sent to 11 corneal topography specialists for subjective classification according to the Ectasia Risk Scoring System. The study population included two groups: 11 eyes that developed ectasia after LASIK and 14 eyes that had successful and stable LASIK outcomes. Each case was first reviewed using the absolute scale masked to the patient group. After 3 months, the same cases were represented using a normative scale and reviewed again by the same examiners for new classifications masked to the patient group. RESULTS: Using the absolute scale, 17 of 25 (68{\%}) cases had variations on the classifications from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 60{\%}. Using the normative scale, the classifications from 11 of 25 (44{\%}) cases varied from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 61{\%}. Eight examiners (73{\%}) reported statistically higher scores (P < .05) when using the normative scale. Considering all 550 topographic analyses (25 cases, 11 examiners, and two scales), the same classification from the two scales was reported for 121 case pairs (44{\%}). CONCLUSION: There was significant inter-observer variability in the subjective classifications using the same scale, and significant intra-observer variability between scales. Changing from an absolute to a normative scale increased the scores on the classifications by the same examiner, but significant inter-observer variability in the subjective interpretation of the maps still persisted.",
author = "Ramos, {Isaac C.} and Rosane Correa and Guerra, {Frederico P.} and William Trattler and Belin, {Michael W} and Klyce, {Stephen D.} and Fontes, {Bruno M.} and Paulo Schor and Smolek, {Michael K.} and Dawson, {Daniel G.} and Chalita, {Maria Regina} and Cazal, {Jorge O.} and Milton Ruiz and Randleman, {J. Bradley} and Renato Ambr{\'o}sio",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3928/1081597X-20130823-01",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "770--775",
journal = "Journal of Refractive Surgery",
issn = "1081-597X",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability of subjective classifications of corneal topography maps from LASIK candidates

AU - Ramos, Isaac C.

AU - Correa, Rosane

AU - Guerra, Frederico P.

AU - Trattler, William

AU - Belin, Michael W

AU - Klyce, Stephen D.

AU - Fontes, Bruno M.

AU - Schor, Paulo

AU - Smolek, Michael K.

AU - Dawson, Daniel G.

AU - Chalita, Maria Regina

AU - Cazal, Jorge O.

AU - Ruiz, Milton

AU - Randleman, J. Bradley

AU - Ambrósio, Renato

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the variability of subjective corneal topography map classification between different experienced examiners and the impact of changing from an absolute to a normative scale on the classifications. METHODS: Preoperative axial curvature maps using Scheimpflug imaging obtained with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) and clinical parameters were sent to 11 corneal topography specialists for subjective classification according to the Ectasia Risk Scoring System. The study population included two groups: 11 eyes that developed ectasia after LASIK and 14 eyes that had successful and stable LASIK outcomes. Each case was first reviewed using the absolute scale masked to the patient group. After 3 months, the same cases were represented using a normative scale and reviewed again by the same examiners for new classifications masked to the patient group. RESULTS: Using the absolute scale, 17 of 25 (68%) cases had variations on the classifications from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 60%. Using the normative scale, the classifications from 11 of 25 (44%) cases varied from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 61%. Eight examiners (73%) reported statistically higher scores (P < .05) when using the normative scale. Considering all 550 topographic analyses (25 cases, 11 examiners, and two scales), the same classification from the two scales was reported for 121 case pairs (44%). CONCLUSION: There was significant inter-observer variability in the subjective classifications using the same scale, and significant intra-observer variability between scales. Changing from an absolute to a normative scale increased the scores on the classifications by the same examiner, but significant inter-observer variability in the subjective interpretation of the maps still persisted.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the variability of subjective corneal topography map classification between different experienced examiners and the impact of changing from an absolute to a normative scale on the classifications. METHODS: Preoperative axial curvature maps using Scheimpflug imaging obtained with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) and clinical parameters were sent to 11 corneal topography specialists for subjective classification according to the Ectasia Risk Scoring System. The study population included two groups: 11 eyes that developed ectasia after LASIK and 14 eyes that had successful and stable LASIK outcomes. Each case was first reviewed using the absolute scale masked to the patient group. After 3 months, the same cases were represented using a normative scale and reviewed again by the same examiners for new classifications masked to the patient group. RESULTS: Using the absolute scale, 17 of 25 (68%) cases had variations on the classifications from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 60%. Using the normative scale, the classifications from 11 of 25 (44%) cases varied from 0 to 4 for the same eye across examiners, and the overall agreement with the mode was 61%. Eight examiners (73%) reported statistically higher scores (P < .05) when using the normative scale. Considering all 550 topographic analyses (25 cases, 11 examiners, and two scales), the same classification from the two scales was reported for 121 case pairs (44%). CONCLUSION: There was significant inter-observer variability in the subjective classifications using the same scale, and significant intra-observer variability between scales. Changing from an absolute to a normative scale increased the scores on the classifications by the same examiner, but significant inter-observer variability in the subjective interpretation of the maps still persisted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888609424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888609424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20130823-01

DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20130823-01

M3 - Article

C2 - 23980708

AN - SCOPUS:84888609424

VL - 29

SP - 770

EP - 775

JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery

SN - 1081-597X

IS - 11

ER -