Variation reduction for multistage manufacturing processes: A comparison survey of statistical-process-control vs stream-of-variation methodologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The performance of Multistage Manufacturing Processes (MMPs) can be measured by quality, productivity and cost, which are inversely related to the variation of key product characteristics (KPCs). Therefore, it is crucial to reduce KPCs' variations by not only detecting the changes of process parameters, but also identifying the variation sources and eliminating them with corrective actions. Recent developments in the Stream-of-Variation (SoV) and Statistical-Process-Control (SPC) methodologies significantly improve the variation reduction for MMPs. This paper provides a review on the reported methodologies by comparing these two categories of methodologies in terms of their variation propagation modeling, process monitoring and diagnostic capability. With an illustrative case study, it is concluded that the recent advancements of SoV and SPC methodologies significantly improve the effectiveness of variation reduction. The discussion on the drawbacks of both methodologies also suggests the future research directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-661
Number of pages17
JournalQuality and Reliability Engineering International
Volume26
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Statistical process control
Process monitoring
Productivity
Costs
Manufacturing process
Methodology

Keywords

  • process monitoring
  • state space model
  • variation propagation
  • variation source identification
  • variation sources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

@article{99fec61b49e14e2bb2f2f5ac8ca84b83,
title = "Variation reduction for multistage manufacturing processes: A comparison survey of statistical-process-control vs stream-of-variation methodologies",
abstract = "The performance of Multistage Manufacturing Processes (MMPs) can be measured by quality, productivity and cost, which are inversely related to the variation of key product characteristics (KPCs). Therefore, it is crucial to reduce KPCs' variations by not only detecting the changes of process parameters, but also identifying the variation sources and eliminating them with corrective actions. Recent developments in the Stream-of-Variation (SoV) and Statistical-Process-Control (SPC) methodologies significantly improve the variation reduction for MMPs. This paper provides a review on the reported methodologies by comparing these two categories of methodologies in terms of their variation propagation modeling, process monitoring and diagnostic capability. With an illustrative case study, it is concluded that the recent advancements of SoV and SPC methodologies significantly improve the effectiveness of variation reduction. The discussion on the drawbacks of both methodologies also suggests the future research directions.",
keywords = "process monitoring, state space model, variation propagation, variation source identification, variation sources",
author = "Jian Liu",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/qre.1148",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "645--661",
journal = "Quality and Reliability Engineering International",
issn = "0748-8017",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation reduction for multistage manufacturing processes

T2 - A comparison survey of statistical-process-control vs stream-of-variation methodologies

AU - Liu, Jian

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - The performance of Multistage Manufacturing Processes (MMPs) can be measured by quality, productivity and cost, which are inversely related to the variation of key product characteristics (KPCs). Therefore, it is crucial to reduce KPCs' variations by not only detecting the changes of process parameters, but also identifying the variation sources and eliminating them with corrective actions. Recent developments in the Stream-of-Variation (SoV) and Statistical-Process-Control (SPC) methodologies significantly improve the variation reduction for MMPs. This paper provides a review on the reported methodologies by comparing these two categories of methodologies in terms of their variation propagation modeling, process monitoring and diagnostic capability. With an illustrative case study, it is concluded that the recent advancements of SoV and SPC methodologies significantly improve the effectiveness of variation reduction. The discussion on the drawbacks of both methodologies also suggests the future research directions.

AB - The performance of Multistage Manufacturing Processes (MMPs) can be measured by quality, productivity and cost, which are inversely related to the variation of key product characteristics (KPCs). Therefore, it is crucial to reduce KPCs' variations by not only detecting the changes of process parameters, but also identifying the variation sources and eliminating them with corrective actions. Recent developments in the Stream-of-Variation (SoV) and Statistical-Process-Control (SPC) methodologies significantly improve the variation reduction for MMPs. This paper provides a review on the reported methodologies by comparing these two categories of methodologies in terms of their variation propagation modeling, process monitoring and diagnostic capability. With an illustrative case study, it is concluded that the recent advancements of SoV and SPC methodologies significantly improve the effectiveness of variation reduction. The discussion on the drawbacks of both methodologies also suggests the future research directions.

KW - process monitoring

KW - state space model

KW - variation propagation

KW - variation source identification

KW - variation sources

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78349302283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78349302283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/qre.1148

DO - 10.1002/qre.1148

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78349302283

VL - 26

SP - 645

EP - 661

JO - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

JF - Quality and Reliability Engineering International

SN - 0748-8017

IS - 7

ER -