Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments

James B. Callegary, Paul A Ferre, R. W. Groom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

97 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vertical spatial sensitivity and effective depth of exploration (d e) of low-induction-number (LIN) instruments over a layered soil were evaluated using a complete numerical solution to Maxwell's equations. Previous studies using approximate mathematical solutions predicted a vertical spatial sensitivity for instruments operating under LIN conditions that, for a given transmitter-receiver coil separation (s), coil orientation, and transmitter frequency, should depend solely on depth below the land surface. When not operating under LIN conditions, vertical spatial sensitivity and de also depend on apparent soil electrical conductivity (σa) and therefore the induction number (β). In this new evaluation, we determined the range of σa and β values for which the LIN conditions hold and how de changes when they do not. Two-layer soil models were simulated with both horizontal (HCP) and vertical (VCP) coplanar coil orientations. Soil layers were given electrical conductivity values ranging from 0.1 to 200 mS m-1. As expected, de decreased as σa increased. Only the least electrically conductive soil produced the de expected when operating under LIN conditions. For the VCP orientation, this was 1.6s, decreasing to 0.8s in the most electrically conductive soil. For the HCP orientation, de decreased from 0.76s to 0.51s. Differences between this and previous studies are attributed to inadequate representation of skin-depth effect and scattering at interfaces between layers. When using LIN instruments to identify depth to water tables, interfaces between soil layers, and variations in salt or moisture content, it is important to consider the dependence of de on σa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-167
Number of pages10
JournalVadose Zone Journal
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

electrical conductivity
soil
layered soils
water table
land surface
skin
moisture content
salt content
scattering
water content
soil layer
effect
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science

Cite this

Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments. / Callegary, James B.; Ferre, Paul A; Groom, R. W.

In: Vadose Zone Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, 02.2007, p. 158-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fdfd9c232e2493badf3675b4d8149f2,
title = "Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments",
abstract = "Vertical spatial sensitivity and effective depth of exploration (d e) of low-induction-number (LIN) instruments over a layered soil were evaluated using a complete numerical solution to Maxwell's equations. Previous studies using approximate mathematical solutions predicted a vertical spatial sensitivity for instruments operating under LIN conditions that, for a given transmitter-receiver coil separation (s), coil orientation, and transmitter frequency, should depend solely on depth below the land surface. When not operating under LIN conditions, vertical spatial sensitivity and de also depend on apparent soil electrical conductivity (σa) and therefore the induction number (β). In this new evaluation, we determined the range of σa and β values for which the LIN conditions hold and how de changes when they do not. Two-layer soil models were simulated with both horizontal (HCP) and vertical (VCP) coplanar coil orientations. Soil layers were given electrical conductivity values ranging from 0.1 to 200 mS m-1. As expected, de decreased as σa increased. Only the least electrically conductive soil produced the de expected when operating under LIN conditions. For the VCP orientation, this was 1.6s, decreasing to 0.8s in the most electrically conductive soil. For the HCP orientation, de decreased from 0.76s to 0.51s. Differences between this and previous studies are attributed to inadequate representation of skin-depth effect and scattering at interfaces between layers. When using LIN instruments to identify depth to water tables, interfaces between soil layers, and variations in salt or moisture content, it is important to consider the dependence of de on σa.",
author = "Callegary, {James B.} and Ferre, {Paul A} and Groom, {R. W.}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2136/vzj2006.0120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "158--167",
journal = "Vadose Zone Journal",
issn = "1539-1663",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vertical spatial sensitivity and exploration depth of low-induction-number electromagnetic-induction instruments

AU - Callegary, James B.

AU - Ferre, Paul A

AU - Groom, R. W.

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Vertical spatial sensitivity and effective depth of exploration (d e) of low-induction-number (LIN) instruments over a layered soil were evaluated using a complete numerical solution to Maxwell's equations. Previous studies using approximate mathematical solutions predicted a vertical spatial sensitivity for instruments operating under LIN conditions that, for a given transmitter-receiver coil separation (s), coil orientation, and transmitter frequency, should depend solely on depth below the land surface. When not operating under LIN conditions, vertical spatial sensitivity and de also depend on apparent soil electrical conductivity (σa) and therefore the induction number (β). In this new evaluation, we determined the range of σa and β values for which the LIN conditions hold and how de changes when they do not. Two-layer soil models were simulated with both horizontal (HCP) and vertical (VCP) coplanar coil orientations. Soil layers were given electrical conductivity values ranging from 0.1 to 200 mS m-1. As expected, de decreased as σa increased. Only the least electrically conductive soil produced the de expected when operating under LIN conditions. For the VCP orientation, this was 1.6s, decreasing to 0.8s in the most electrically conductive soil. For the HCP orientation, de decreased from 0.76s to 0.51s. Differences between this and previous studies are attributed to inadequate representation of skin-depth effect and scattering at interfaces between layers. When using LIN instruments to identify depth to water tables, interfaces between soil layers, and variations in salt or moisture content, it is important to consider the dependence of de on σa.

AB - Vertical spatial sensitivity and effective depth of exploration (d e) of low-induction-number (LIN) instruments over a layered soil were evaluated using a complete numerical solution to Maxwell's equations. Previous studies using approximate mathematical solutions predicted a vertical spatial sensitivity for instruments operating under LIN conditions that, for a given transmitter-receiver coil separation (s), coil orientation, and transmitter frequency, should depend solely on depth below the land surface. When not operating under LIN conditions, vertical spatial sensitivity and de also depend on apparent soil electrical conductivity (σa) and therefore the induction number (β). In this new evaluation, we determined the range of σa and β values for which the LIN conditions hold and how de changes when they do not. Two-layer soil models were simulated with both horizontal (HCP) and vertical (VCP) coplanar coil orientations. Soil layers were given electrical conductivity values ranging from 0.1 to 200 mS m-1. As expected, de decreased as σa increased. Only the least electrically conductive soil produced the de expected when operating under LIN conditions. For the VCP orientation, this was 1.6s, decreasing to 0.8s in the most electrically conductive soil. For the HCP orientation, de decreased from 0.76s to 0.51s. Differences between this and previous studies are attributed to inadequate representation of skin-depth effect and scattering at interfaces between layers. When using LIN instruments to identify depth to water tables, interfaces between soil layers, and variations in salt or moisture content, it is important to consider the dependence of de on σa.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547872328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547872328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2136/vzj2006.0120

DO - 10.2136/vzj2006.0120

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34547872328

VL - 6

SP - 158

EP - 167

JO - Vadose Zone Journal

JF - Vadose Zone Journal

SN - 1539-1663

IS - 1

ER -