Vicarious hypocrisy: Bolstering attitudes and taking action after exposure to a hypocritical ingroup member

Elizabeth S. Focella, Jeffrey A Stone, Nicholas C. Fernandez, Joel Cooper, Michael A. Hogg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four studies tested the prediction that when highly identified group members observe another ingroup member behave hypocritically, they experience vicarious hypocrisy, which they reduce by bolstering their support for the ingroup hypocrite's message. Participants in Experiment 1 (N = 161) who witnessed a similar ingroup member act hypocritically about using sunscreen reported more positive attitudes toward using sunscreen than participants exposed to an outgroup hypocrite or to a dissimilar ingroup hypocrite. The effect of vicarious hypocrisy on attitude bolstering was attenuated in Experiment 2 (N = 68) when ingroup identity was affirmed. In Experiment 3 (N = 64), more highly identified participants acquired sunscreen when a fellow ingroup member's hypocrisy was attributed to high compared to low choice. Experiment 4 (N = 68) showed that a misattribution cue attenuated the effect of vicarious hypocrisy on sunscreen acquisition. The discussion focuses on the vicarious dissonance processes that motivate some observers to defend, rather than reject, a hypocritical ingroup member.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-102
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume62
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Sunscreening Agents
experiment
outgroup
group membership
Cues
experience

Keywords

  • Attitudes
  • Cognitive dissonance
  • Hypocrisy
  • Self-affirmation
  • Vicarious

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Vicarious hypocrisy : Bolstering attitudes and taking action after exposure to a hypocritical ingroup member. / Focella, Elizabeth S.; Stone, Jeffrey A; Fernandez, Nicholas C.; Cooper, Joel; Hogg, Michael A.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 62, 01.01.2016, p. 89-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Focella, Elizabeth S. ; Stone, Jeffrey A ; Fernandez, Nicholas C. ; Cooper, Joel ; Hogg, Michael A. / Vicarious hypocrisy : Bolstering attitudes and taking action after exposure to a hypocritical ingroup member. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 62. pp. 89-102.
@article{99e53604f2eb49aaa6c794446348ec42,
title = "Vicarious hypocrisy: Bolstering attitudes and taking action after exposure to a hypocritical ingroup member",
abstract = "Four studies tested the prediction that when highly identified group members observe another ingroup member behave hypocritically, they experience vicarious hypocrisy, which they reduce by bolstering their support for the ingroup hypocrite's message. Participants in Experiment 1 (N = 161) who witnessed a similar ingroup member act hypocritically about using sunscreen reported more positive attitudes toward using sunscreen than participants exposed to an outgroup hypocrite or to a dissimilar ingroup hypocrite. The effect of vicarious hypocrisy on attitude bolstering was attenuated in Experiment 2 (N = 68) when ingroup identity was affirmed. In Experiment 3 (N = 64), more highly identified participants acquired sunscreen when a fellow ingroup member's hypocrisy was attributed to high compared to low choice. Experiment 4 (N = 68) showed that a misattribution cue attenuated the effect of vicarious hypocrisy on sunscreen acquisition. The discussion focuses on the vicarious dissonance processes that motivate some observers to defend, rather than reject, a hypocritical ingroup member.",
keywords = "Attitudes, Cognitive dissonance, Hypocrisy, Self-affirmation, Vicarious",
author = "Focella, {Elizabeth S.} and Stone, {Jeffrey A} and Fernandez, {Nicholas C.} and Joel Cooper and Hogg, {Michael A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "89--102",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vicarious hypocrisy

T2 - Bolstering attitudes and taking action after exposure to a hypocritical ingroup member

AU - Focella, Elizabeth S.

AU - Stone, Jeffrey A

AU - Fernandez, Nicholas C.

AU - Cooper, Joel

AU - Hogg, Michael A.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Four studies tested the prediction that when highly identified group members observe another ingroup member behave hypocritically, they experience vicarious hypocrisy, which they reduce by bolstering their support for the ingroup hypocrite's message. Participants in Experiment 1 (N = 161) who witnessed a similar ingroup member act hypocritically about using sunscreen reported more positive attitudes toward using sunscreen than participants exposed to an outgroup hypocrite or to a dissimilar ingroup hypocrite. The effect of vicarious hypocrisy on attitude bolstering was attenuated in Experiment 2 (N = 68) when ingroup identity was affirmed. In Experiment 3 (N = 64), more highly identified participants acquired sunscreen when a fellow ingroup member's hypocrisy was attributed to high compared to low choice. Experiment 4 (N = 68) showed that a misattribution cue attenuated the effect of vicarious hypocrisy on sunscreen acquisition. The discussion focuses on the vicarious dissonance processes that motivate some observers to defend, rather than reject, a hypocritical ingroup member.

AB - Four studies tested the prediction that when highly identified group members observe another ingroup member behave hypocritically, they experience vicarious hypocrisy, which they reduce by bolstering their support for the ingroup hypocrite's message. Participants in Experiment 1 (N = 161) who witnessed a similar ingroup member act hypocritically about using sunscreen reported more positive attitudes toward using sunscreen than participants exposed to an outgroup hypocrite or to a dissimilar ingroup hypocrite. The effect of vicarious hypocrisy on attitude bolstering was attenuated in Experiment 2 (N = 68) when ingroup identity was affirmed. In Experiment 3 (N = 64), more highly identified participants acquired sunscreen when a fellow ingroup member's hypocrisy was attributed to high compared to low choice. Experiment 4 (N = 68) showed that a misattribution cue attenuated the effect of vicarious hypocrisy on sunscreen acquisition. The discussion focuses on the vicarious dissonance processes that motivate some observers to defend, rather than reject, a hypocritical ingroup member.

KW - Attitudes

KW - Cognitive dissonance

KW - Hypocrisy

KW - Self-affirmation

KW - Vicarious

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947739973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947739973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947739973

VL - 62

SP - 89

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -